Jump to content
Gentleman's Military Interest Club

Dave Wilkinson

Silver Membership
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Dave Wilkinson

  • Rank
    Regular Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Formby, Merseyside

Recent Profile Visitors

3,315 profile views
  1. RUC mess dress. Whether they are currently worn with PSNI badges etc I know not. Dave.
  2. Mike, Great minds think alike!! Dave.
  3. Dave, Unless you are sure of what you are buying, take great care in splashing out on painted truncheons. There are so many "chair legs" fashioned to look like the real thing by those interested in making a quick buck, that its fraught with danger. Even seasoned experts can be caught out. Personally, I've always stayed well clear. But each to his own. As they say, forewarned is forearmed. Dave.
  4. You could try contacting the SJAB HQ in London. If they can't help they may be able to point you in the right direction. Dave.
  5. Spot on Peter. Had forgotten that they even had a badge. Thanks for sharing mate! Dave.
  6. Gents, Mike is correct. The Metpol. issued uniforms to their SC at the start of the Great War and as far as I'm aware whilst the armlet was worn, the metal arm plate was not. Dave.
  7. Dave, Looks impressive!! Dave.
  8. Dave, I may have one. Send me an email and I'll see what I can find. dave.wilkinson73@btinternet.com Dave.
  9. Having seen the engraving close up, I would say that this was not the work of the Royal Mint. You are wise to leave well alone. Dave.
  10. I can't comment on the style of naming, what I would caution is buying anything from a HK based seller. Take great care. There are many individuals who are "producing" no end of fake/altered items of memorabilia which purport to be from the pre.1997 disciplined services in HK. Dave.
  11. Dave, I would not hold out much hope. His warrant number would be the key to identification. As I understand it divisional numbers were/are re-issued, so over a period of time (in theory) several individuals could have used that number. Someone with greater knowledge than me may be able to narrow the field down for you. Dave.
  12. Dave, I don't think the "10" relates to the year of issue. It may be the size. When you get it, closely examine the lining and some other markings may be revealed. Police Orders dated Thursday April 9 1936, No:- 3 announced that chrome plated buttons etc were to be fitted to new issues of clothing. Your tunic has on it chrome plated buttons (as opposed to the earlier white metal version which required polishing), so it post dates 1936. I hope this is helpful. Dave.
  13. Nothing apparently wrong with the tunic or helmet. It appears to be of the pattern called the No:- 1 tunic/uniform which was worn on ceremonial occasions through to 11th November 1972 (think I have the date correct), when they were withdrawn. If you look inside the sleeve you should find some stamping in blue ink (The letters "MP" and the Crown together with a year). The year shown is that in which the tunic was issued. The helmet would have been worn (quite correctly) with the tunic. If you look at archive photos/film of the Queen's Coronation, you will see that this tunic and helmet were worn on the day by Metpol. Sergeants and Constables. Hope this is helpful. Dave. Ps. Forgot to mention that the tunic would have been worn with a black leather "snake" belt.
  14. Bruce, There was only one Constable W. BELL serving in "D" Division during the period covered by the medals. His Warrant No:- was 78129. His first name was William. He joined the Metpol. on 21st November 1892 and was posted to "D" Division. He retired on pension as a Constable on 13th November 1920. He spent the whole of his service in "D" Division (Marylebone sometimes referred to as St. Marylebone). I hope this is helpful. Dave.
  15. Excellent! Thank you for sharing. Dave.