Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Harry the Mole

    Patron
    • Posts

      68
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      2

    Everything posted by Harry the Mole

    1. You cannot grumble at £9. It looks a bit like the ones that some have claimed were made by SPINK in the 1970's. But if you want a really quality copy, give me a PM and I'll fix you up with one. Cheers, Steve
    2. Those of who served in Northern Ireland during the 'Troubles' never got our own 'proper' medal. Cheers, Steve
    3. Not a problem, I'm always willing to help if I can. I for got to say... it goes without saying that they are ALL repro's anyway, you won't find a genuine one on fleabay. Your best bet is a tailors copy if you can find one.
    4. Steer well clear of that type, they are junk. Often advertised as 'bronze' instead of 'bronze coated'. have a close look at the face of the lion, it is truly dreadful! Cheers, Steve
    5. Here you go... this is what diligent searching can turn up on eBay if you look around enough. But as always, you need to know a little bit about what you are hunting down. Both medals were purchased on eBay. The one on the left is cast in bronze, and the one on the right is bronze coated. Both look the same, but the one on the left is the size of the original with the cross at 36mm wide and 41mm high. The one on the right is 34mm wide and 39mm high. Other differences are that the one on the left has no visible seams on the sides of the arms of the cross and the mane of the lion is curled. The cross on the right has seams on the sides of the arms of the cross and the lions mane is straighter. The borders of both crosses are also narrower than an original VC, but the medal on the left is of far superior quality of the one on the right. The cross on the right turns up on eBay quite regularly, and the one on the left - less frequently, and sometimes it is usually poorly cast. But you can drop lucky and get yourself a good tailors copy like the example on the left for next to nothing. Cheers, Steve
    6. I would have thought that attachment holes would be the norm - as used on other ribbon attachments, such as rosettes, Mons Star bar, oakleaf... A nice little VC though. Hey, Tony... keep looking on fleabay, it's surprising what crops up on there. I have another tailors copy VC that I purchased on there about three months back. I'll see if I can get it photographed later today and post it on this thread. Again it is another one that would slip under the radar of many collectors. Cheers, Steve
    7. They all look OK, although I prefer the military pistols to the civilian one's. It's always nicer to see them in hand too. Maybe you would get 'mates rates?' Cheers, Steve
    8. Some nice pistols there. Are you going to buy any?
    9. Hi Tony, Just to muddy the waters a bit more for you, it should really be referred to as a 'Caliver'. The Caliver was a shorter version of the Arquebus - although both were matchlock. The standard matchlock of the Civil War period came in a variety of bores, and this caused problems for the musketeers on the battlefields - who often found that they had to deform the shape of musket balls to make them fit the barrel. A shorter version of the Arquebus was introduced with a standard bore of barrel, and this was known as the Caliver . The word Caliver was a corruption of the Italian word for internal measurement - which was Calibre. And that is basically how the word Calibre or Caliber came to mean the size of the bullet for any particular weapon. The matchlock was replaced by the wheellock - a system of igniting the powder which had many advantages over the matchlock, but was rather complicated and expensive to make. The (VERY) basic principle of how it works is when the trigger is squeezed, a wheel spins and causes sparks, which in turn ignites the powder in the pan. After that came the Snaphaunce and Doglock. The Doglock had no internal half-cock position, so the hammer was held back by a catch - the 'dog' - which engaged with the hammer as it was drawn to the rear. The gun could then be safely loaded and the hammer fully drawn to the rear and ready to fire. The next stage in the evolution of these weapons was the Flintlock, with this variation having an internal half-cock position, As the hammer was drawn to the rear, it was held at half-cock and rendered safe to load. This next bit is off topic, but serves to illustrate the use of half-cock as a safety feature. Even some relatively modern weapons used the half-cock as a safety device rather than a proper safety catch. The Maxim-type guns had no safety as such, and during WW1 the guns were kept at readiness by having them at half-cock. Maxim type guns had to be cocked twice to load them, the first pull of the crank merely placed the extractor over the base of the round in the belt when the action was cycled. This was the half-cock position. On the second pull of the crank, the cartridge was withdrawn from the feed belt and taken to the rear. As the lock returned to battery, the round was fed into the breech, the extractors moved up and grabbed the base of the next round, and the gun was ready to fire. Unlike other machine guns, the Maxi guns - of which the Vickers gun was a modified Maxim - the gun fired from a closed bolt. In other words, there was ALWAYS a round in the breech unless the gun was at half-cock. This was why Maxim guns were water cooled - it was to stop the round cooking off in a hot barrel. Cheers, Steve
    10. Here's something you don't see that often on military forums. I acquired this musket a couple of weeks ago, and although in the style of an English Civil War musket, it is probably Georgian or Victorian period. It's probably hard to believe, but even after these guns were replaced by doglocks and matchlocks, they still remained popular in civilian use - even as late as the early Victorian period. This was mainly down to cost, this type of weapon being much cheaper than a flintlock. Overall length is 4ft 11inches, with a 43 inch barrel in .70 calibre, and a weight of 7.5 lbs. The crossbow type trigger lever is remarkably light to use, and the gun sits nicely in the shoulder. The fishtail butt is canted to the right and this helps sighting along the barrel. There are no proof marks or makers name on the barrel, and the lock is only marked with a couple of serial numbers, so it's impossible to date the gun with any accuracy. Aside from a small crack to the stock at the muzzle end, it is in remarkably good condition - and is in full working order. Cheers, Steve
    11. Hi Tony, I hear what you are saying, but it doesn't ease the sense of frustration when you try to help someone and they cannot even bother to reply. Nice buttons by the way... during my time in the Army Cadets (252 Hulme Cadet Bty RA, 1963- 1969) we had the old wartime BD uniforms with brass buttons & cap badges, whitened lanyards, and blancoe'd belts & gaiters... and I loved every minute of it, But the staybrite junk I had in the regulars was horrendous. No blanco either, belt & gaiters were done with black boot polish! I was a cloud puncher by the way. First on the Bofor's LA40/70, and then the trials unit for Rapier before returning to NI for one last tour of ops in 1974 before leaving the army. Cheers, Steve
    12. The problem with attempting to restore anything is that whatever you do will only highlight the pitting and other faults that the item might have, and the best solution is to sympathetically clean and preserve. I usually use nothing more than fine wire wool and beeswax polish - the solid kind - and NOT the aerosol. Cheers, Steve
    13. I find this to be one of the problems with possibly ALL militaria forums. You get people coming on and asking for help, they get their wish - and then they cannot even be bothered to reply. Most of my time has been spent on War Relics Forum - where I was a paying member for the best part of 13 years with over 5,000 posts, but in recent years the forum has lost its lustre. Too many people asking for help and not contributing, and too many members reading posts without commenting and joining in the discussion. I am tempted to become a paying member on here, but would I just be supporting yet another forum that suffers from the same problems? Cheers, Steve
    14. Having looked closer at the images of the above VC, I can see that it is a copy. If you look at the inner border where it reaches the tail of the Lion, you will notice that the border does not continue to the rear body of the Lion. On an original - and some copies - the border continues down to touch the body of the Lion. Here is the very early tailors copy that I picked up on eBay. In November 2019, SPINK sold two of these medals named to Boer War veterans. One sold for £950, and the other for £1,000. My tailors copy is slightly larger than an original medal, but it is cast in bronze and has beautifully sharp detail. Cheers, Steve
    15. Aside from the fact that the pictures are so poor to be of any use, there is no indication of the size of the medal. All copies of the VC have differences than the genuine VC, and if you know what to look for the differences are very obvious. Most of the modern copies are - to be quite honest - absolute junk. They are often die-struck and bronze coated instead of cast in solid bronze, and the face of the Lion looks more like the face of a Chinese dragon with some of them having legs that look like balloons. Even the Hancocks made replica is 2mm smaller than their original medal. Tailors copies occasionally crop up on fleabay, and just recently I was able to obtain a circa 1890's tailors copy for a mere £26 on there. It was one that just slipped through the net and other bidders didn't realise what it was. There is absolutely no way you could pass off a replica as the original, as all issued VC's are accounted for - with the exception of just a couple that went missing/stolen. Cheers, Steve
    16. A bit late in replying, but many thanks for the information. I still have the set, although I am no closer to identifying the individual in the picture. All the items in the frame - including the photo - have always been together. The set was obtained in a house clearance by Kris (Stuka f) a fair few years ago. Cheers, Steve
    17. Bear in mind that British soldiers were sent there as peace keepers instead of Police, and during those early months they were welcomed with open arms by the Catholic community. It was only when certain members of the Official IRA wished to take up arms against the British soldiers that the situation started to turn ugly and soldiers started to be killed. I was there (Andersonstown) at a time when the violence against the troops was at its greatest... November 1971 to March 1972, and again in June 1974. I kept a record of both my tours, and these were later turned into two books. The second one (and the best) came out in 2015. Cheers, Steve
    18. Unfortunately the details on the documents are difficult for me to make out. But if you research the squadron in which he flew, it should give information on the type of aircraft used at the time of his death. Cheers, Steve.
    19. If the option to 'Enable Editing' appears on the top of the document, press on it and the doc will appear in it's proper form. Cheers, Steve.
    20. The only item I have which can be categorically linked to the battle of the Somme is a kodak pocket camera, once the property of Private Harold Tookey. A few years ago I did a 'blog' for Helion publishing. I trust that no-one minds me attaching it to this post, and I hope you find it of interest. Cheers, Steve Private Harold Tookey.docx
    21. Hi Kris, The set has come to a good home, and I will not be parting with it. I think that in someone else's hands it might have been broken up to sell as single medals. I will renew my search for the soldier's name soon. Cheers, Steve
    22. Gentlemen... it has been a few years since I last graced this forum, but hopefully I shall be considerably more active in the future. For your perusal, a set of 14 WW1 (and WW2) Belgian medals awarded to the same man. The main set of 11 medals are mounted on an adjustable brass rod, and there can be no doubt that these have always been together. The hidden portion of the ribbons are still very vibrant colours - whereas the exposed portions have faded. The set displays the later 'Yser Cross' rather than the medal, and the Croix de Guerre has the Lion motif on the ribbon. I had to re-mount the whole lot to the velvet card within the frame, but all the main 11 medals remain attached to the brass rod as they were done at the time. There is no name on the photograph, although the cap shows the soldier to have served with the 2nd Infantry regiment. I am hopeful that eventually I will be able to put a name to the picture, a man who has won such honours must surely be listed somewhere. I have a copy of 'LIVRE D'OR DE LA CARTE DU FEU', but so far I have not been able to trace him. Cheers, Steve. A few more pictures...
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.