Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Hugh

    Valued Member
    • Posts

      2,516
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      8

    Posts posted by Hugh

    1. Watch may be worn with watch in right pocket of vest, and fob in left vest pocket.  If not wearing a vest, you may put the watch in left jacket breast pocket and fob through the jacket button hole.  

    2. The fact that it is hollow with removeable ends suggests to me that it was a courier device used for the secure transmission of messages.  Similar devices, often ornate silver, have been used in India in the 18th and 19th centuries.  Just guessing, but the style looks early 19th century.  Don't think it has anything to do with the rank of the user.  While the US Army / Marine Corps have a tradition of swagger sticks, they normally are not indicators of rank.  

       

      What makes you think it's American other than the eagles?

    3. I recently bought a new miniature of Isabel la Catolica, officer's grade for a friend who was invested in the Order last October.  It came from Cejalvo who were very cooperative.  Unlike some miniatures, it has a button for the buttonhole in your lapel as opposed to a pin.  My dinner jacket doesn't have a buttonhole!  I also notice that it does not have a pasador (the gold top bar) as full size Spanish medals do (and as GM1's examples do).  Maybe that's the new style.  Any comments on that?

       

      Hugh

      IMG_5622.JPG

      IMG_5618.JPG

      IMG_5620.JPG

      IMG_5635.JPG

      IMG_5633.JPG

    4. I have a friend who was invested as an Officer of the Order of Isabel la Catolica last week.  The award included the large medal with rosette and a buttonhole rosette, but not the miniature medal as worn with evening dress.  I'd like to get contact information for a supplier so I can get the miniature medal for him.  I'm sure Antonio or someone else could help, please.  

       

      Many thanks,

      Hugh

    5. RAL is correct about the silver star.  In the '60's and '70's, multiple awards were relatively rare, but recently both the Commendation and the Achievement Medals seem to be awarded much more frequently.  There has also been a proliferation of many new ribbons for various assignments such as deployments, training, etc.  It has resulted in a remarkable assortment of fruit salad on the chests of relatively junior people with mostly routine duties.  

    6. Many years ago in Inverness, I acquired this officer's levee dress sporran for the Seaforth Highlanders.  I was told that the sporran dated "from the 1880's".  The latest battle honor listed in the trophy on the cantle is "Kandahar 1880"  The next battle honor would be "Afghanistan 1878-1880".

      My question is whether it dates before or after amalgamation of the two battalions (72 and 78th Highlanders) into the Seaforth Highlanders in 1881.  My family's history is with the 78th.  If it's from before, can you tell which battalion it is from?  

      I've always thought that the six gold bullion tassels were particularly grand.  Is there any significance to the number six?  

      When I pulled it out of storage for a holiday event, I discovered serious corrosion on the left side of the lower silver part of the cantle (See img 5464)  I've worked hard on it with Brasso and also with Met-All polish, but it's still not up to standard.  Any thoughts?  

      I've added a couple of pictures to show the back.  You can see the pins fastening the insignia to the cantle base.  In theory, I could remove them, lift off the silver insignia and polish it separately, as well as having better access to polish the brass part, but with something this old, I'm reluctant to do that.  

      Hugh

       

      IMG_5460.JPG

      IMG_5462.JPG

      IMG_5463.JPG

      IMG_5464.JPG

      15 minutes ago, Hugh said:

      Many years ago in Inverness, I acquired this officer's levee dress sporran for the Seaforth Highlanders.  I was told that the sporran dated "from the 1880's".  The latest battle honor listed in the trophy on the cantle is "Kandahar 1880"  My question is whether it dates before or after amalgamation of the two battalions (72 and 78th Highlanders) into the Seaforth Highlanders in 1881.  My family's history is with the 78th.  If it's from before, can you tell which battalion it is from?  

      I've always thought that the six gold bullion tassels were particularly grand.  Is there any significance to the number six?  

      When I pulled it out of storage for a holiday event, I discovered serious corrosion on the left side of the lower silver part of the cantle (See img 5464)  I've worked hard on it with Brasso and also with Met-All polish, but it's still not up to standard.  Any thoughts?  

       

      Hugh

       

      IMG_5460.JPG

      IMG_5462.JPG

      IMG_5463.JPG

      IMG_5464.JPG

       

      IMG_5467.JPG

      IMG_5469.JPG

      IMG_5470.JPG

    7. The first item is similar to both the 103rd Aero Squadron and the 94 Pursuit squadron insignia (Lafayette Escadrille}, however, doesn't look like official US Army issue.  More like a sweetheart pin.  

      Don't recognize # 2 or 3, but # 3 is more like official issue US Army WW I insignia.  Blackened, fastener on reverse.  

    8. On 31/07/2020 at 14:48, Trooper_D said:

      Apologies, I should have spotted that you also made the ADC connection, Hugh.

      And just a final note on the aiguillette - Since he was ADC to the Viceroy, wearing it on the right side, as noted in the extract below, is completely correct, since the Viceroy is the Vice King, equivalent to a sovereign for India.    

      Hugh

    9. A lack of specific knowledge has never prevented me from diving in, so here goes.  I question whether  this is a regimental uniform.  Reasons:

      1.  The shoulder cords don't appear to have any rank insignia.  Perhaps he's wearing rank on his sleeves as during the early part of WW I?

      2.  The collar and breast embroidery don't appear to be regimental.  If it were a regimental uniform, I'd expect an identifiable regimental emblem on the collar.  I'd also expect the collar edge to have a wider gold lace, sometimes with identifiable regimental motif.  

      3.  Maxwell initially served in the Sussex Regiment, then in various other regimental and staff assignments.  He was attached to Roberts Light Horse when he won the VC, but that doesn't mean he was a member of Roberts.  Wikipedia cites a number of units assigned. 

      4.  He also served as Kitchener's aide-de-camp in South Africa and later in India.  He's wearing the aigulette of an aide, although in the USA, wearing it on the right shoulder denotes an aide to the President.  I had thought the UK followed the same practice, aide to the sovereign.  This uniform could reflect that service.  (A likely time to have such a photograph made)  

      5.  Dates of award of the CSI and the bar to his DSO (not shown in this picture, awarded in 1916) could also narrow the date of the photo and hence the unit to which he was then assigned.  

      I am sadly ignorant of the embroidery worn by Indian Army general officers.   

      Now, let's see who's going to be the first to prove me wrong.  

      Hugh

    10. Have just downloaded your magnificent article on the Second Republic.  While I haven't had a chance to study it yet, it looks like the definitive source for these awards.  Many thanks for making it available.  

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.