Egorka

Silver Membership
  • Content count

    201
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Egorka

  • Rank
    Regular Member
  • Birthday
  1. "Kiznagei"(?) - this is most likely "kaznachei" (казначей), which means a treasurer. "TWO MMMs (and the 80 numbers apart" - well, peculiar but nothing unheard of. The serial number some times are presenting some surprises. Serial numbers can be used to get idea of time and location, but it is also often fails, as one can not simply rely on completely. The first MMM is in May 1945, is one of those awards, which were given after the V-E day. There was a campaign in the Red Army to award the personnel in May 45. That is why the citation is so brief as was mentioned above. Second MMM from 05 Nov 1946 is from "for long service" decree. Belgrade was issued by the same, on 18 December 1946. The ARMY was not at Belgrade... but Gavrilenko HAD been. Gavrilenko was serving in the 13 Guards Mechanised Brigade, 2 Ukrainian Front, which was indeed involved in the Belgrad liberation. Here is the a page from the 13 GvMBR battle journal. Nice group!
  2. With the given picture quality looks OK to me. It is also a good idea to ask for edge photographs, especially at 6 o'clock.
  3. I think this is badge is different to British WW1 wound badge. I think the proportions are off. The design is very similar though... In my analysis I assume almost no distortion on the British wound badge picture (very very small in both horizontal and vertical planes). I the mystery badge photograph some distortion is present, but I assume it is very minimal in the vertical plane. What do you think? IMHO, the difference in ratios I got, cannot be explained by the the distortion due to projection and blurriness.....
  4. My favorit... Collectibles Chinese Copper Medals,1900-1970s different medal,Random 50 Pieces
  5. I was just writing exactly the same! It all just MADE UP, you see!
  6. Hello Solsearcher! It would be helpful to show the whole medal bar. Often the composition of the awards gives more information than identity of each award separately.
  7. Hello, maybe this will be useful: Abbreviations used in the First World War medal index cards http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/records/abbreviations-in-world-war-one-medal-index-cards-rank.pdf
  8. And so here is the citations for the Red Banner. Regiment Commander Guards Major MISCHENKO distinguished himself in the fighting around TLUSH, KRUSHE-STARE, TROIANE and main road BELOSTOK-WARSAW. His regiment supporting the Corps's tank brigades was one of the first to cut the main road BELOSTOK-WARSAW, which cut of the main retreat way. In the heat of the battle Mischenko was with his troops and despite the heavy artillery and mortar fire was directing the regiments forces. During the engagement 18 - 22 August 1944 the regiment destroyed: Tanks - 11 Veicles - 8 Artillery and MG positions - 16 Carriages - 10 Enemy troops - 145 For excellent execution of the orders and achieving the given battle goals, and exhibited personal gallantry MISCHENKO is recommended for the ordrer "RED BANNER". 22 Aug 1944 Signed by the commander of the 8 Gu. Tank Corps, Guards Colonel GRETSOV.
  9. 301 Gv.SAP belonged to 8 Guards Tank Corps, 2 Shock Army. Here is the tactical sign of the 8 GuTC. The heavy SPGs from 310 Gv.SAP in Danzig (Gdansk) 1945.
  10. Hej, Paul... Could not find time to assemble proper research on the Major Mischenko... But here is some info for you. No, that is not long service order. The order is given for the engagements during 18 - 22 August 1944. The interesting is that Mischenko just took over the 301st SPG regiment days before. So it was his first action in Regiment commande capacity. The previous Regiment commander Gurds Colonel Lieutenant IONIS was killed during the battle of LUBLIN (25 July 1944). This is Mark Ionis portrait. Information in the regiment history that the commande has been killed and buried in LUBLIN, Poland. Lublin operation, 301 Gv.SPG regiment is marked (23 - 27 July 1944).
  11. You are not the one who sold it to me? Just kidding. Thanks for the comment!
  12. Are not these sold by weight on eBay?
  13. Hello. Sorry, why is it solved? I don't see the link between the pin and the information provided here in the thread. The name on the pin is quite generic and the abbreviation fits to almost any European language. So this doesn't help to harrow it down. Unless a direct match is found, the only clue I see is te shape of the swastika. It is in a circle and has distinctive short sides. The one I am thinking was indeed the Swedish one, but it was round swastika. Here we have strait short sides...
  14. Interesting. Good find, Bill! Some extra information could be interesting. It appears ARTEMOVA was wounded second time at the very end of November 1943. she was in the hospital for the next 4 moths until end of March 1944, when she was released with "not fit for active service" verdict. She was a teacher (Secondary school #10, Leningrad), married (to Daniil Ivanovich), and from Leningrad. She volunteered for military service in 1942 in Tambov district, so this means she managed to evacuate from the besieged Leningrad. This is her release form after hospital. Blue crayon is the "not fit for active service" resolution, so it looks like she was not lightely wounded. Also it appears she was wounded back in April 1943 and in October 1943. But we know from citation, that in October she was wounded twice. So she was actually wounded at least 3 times during her service. The locations of actions in October 1943.
  15. One more historical document is soiled by greedy hands... Shameful!