I'm amazed that anyone would think the British soldier of the Victorian era was not 'into' war-fighting! Sikh Wars - against a numerically superior and equally well armed foe. Various wars in South Africa against Boers and Zulus, The Sudan, Egypt, Gold Coast, Fenian Raids in Canada - logistic excellence there I might add, the Indian Mutiny, China, 2nd Afghan War, Burma, Chitral, Tirah. All pretty decently supplied and victualled over vast distances with the LoC and MSR having to be protected. The Crimea provided the catalyst for improvements in logistics, medical services and soldiers welfare., though progress in those areas was indeed slow.
The British Officer Corps was certainly amateur - commission by purchase being the norm for most of Victoria's reign - though despite this produced some able Generals - Roberts, Wolsely, Kitchener - to name but a few - and many, many brave and enthusiastic officers. British 'Other Ranks' i.e. - Enlisted Personnel - were subjected to extremely harsh discipline - flogging was extant until, IIRC, 1868 - were brave though were not required (officially) to display initiative. it was not until the last years of Victoria's reign that Baden-Powell (founder of the Boy Scout movement) started to encourage and train his soldiers to act independently - this caught on throughout the Army though was not universally popular among hide bound traditionalists in the Officer Corps.
I highly recommend a book called 'Old Soldier Sahib' written by Frank Richards DCM MM, a memoir of his service as a Private Soldier with the 23rd Royal Welch Fusiliers in Britain, India, and Burma. from 1900 through 1908 - not much had changed during his time from the late Victorian era and shows the enthusiasm for soldiering and loyalty to Regiment pervading the British infantry of that time.