nickstrenk Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 (edited) Dear Collegues,your opinion ,please.The complete was bought in 2001.1st clas is solid gold-weihgt 28 gr.Numbers on the reverses are the same ilke in the Orders book.Mikuláš some more pictures Edited March 31, 2017 by nickstrenk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slava1stclass Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Mikuláš, Unfortunately, the Order of Glory First Class is a reproduction and not an authentic piece. Additionally, there is no record of OGI serial number 2412 ever having been produced/awarded which makes the OGII, OGIII and Ordenskaya Knizhka in this "set" similarly bad. Regards, slava1stclass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickstrenk Posted March 31, 2017 Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 Thanks,the answers similar yours, I have already had.I do not exactly undderstand-reproduction?Fake?Copy in correct metal?What to do with it?To sell as gold to a goldsmith?The Orders book is on Malikov Nikolaj Ivanovich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slava1stclass Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 1 minute ago, nickstrenk said: Thanks,the answers similar yours, I have already had.I do not exactly undderstand-reproduction?Fake?Copy in correct metal?What to do with it?To sell as gold to a goldsmith?The Orders book is on Malikov Nikolaj Ivanovich. nickstrenk, The word reproduction as I've used it here means something meant to deceive - it is not an official mint-issued duplicate. To call it a fake is also accurate. You would have to have a jeweler test the metal to confirm whether it is actually gold. It is then up to you to decide how you want to dispose of the OGI. Selling it for its pure gold content alone would be an option. None of the three OG serial numbers listed in the OK match those awarded to Malikov, Nikolay Ivanovich. Regards, slava1stclass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickstrenk Posted March 31, 2017 Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 I will do it again.I visited the goldsmith at least 3 times and he made the examination on the stone using acid.But not пробу .So the accurate word is фуфло,is not it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slava1stclass Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, nickstrenk said: So the accurate word is фуфло,is not it? nickstrenk, Yes, the Russian word "фуфло" is an accurate description. Regards, slava1stclass Edited March 31, 2017 by slava1stclass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Egorka Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 (edited) I would also add, that the handwriting stile in the award booklet is not convincing at all, and reminds me of a a student handwriting from 1990s. Not a hard evidence, but one should also have in mind nonetheless. Edited April 1, 2017 by Egorka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Gaumann Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 19 hours ago, slava1stclass said: Yes, the Russian word "фуфло" is an accurate description. For those wondering "фуфло" translates to 'garbage'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now