Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Belgian Victory Medals


    Guest Darrell

    Recommended Posts

    Hi Gents,

    I'm obviously a bit slow after the Christmas excesses - that picture of the Official Type 2 I mentioned in my last post is from Laslo! I thought I'd found something new on the sammler.ru site.

    But has anyone got a photo of the Official Type 2 in colour, or another example? Is the strange flattening of the top of the ball suspension a one-off on the example Laslo saw, or is it on all these medals? Indeed, is the one Laslo saw a one-off that someone had gilded and polished for their own personal bit of bling?

    Bill

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Jean-Michel,

    An impressive collection. Am I right in thinking you don't have the Official Type 2? There doesn't seem to be a particularly shiny one amongst them.

    My Janvier-Berchot has the larger BRONZE.

    Bill

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    hi bill,
    I think I have the model N°2, looking good and my medals with a magnifying glass, we see that the model with the suspension of copper would be N°2.
    If I spend my medal with a deoxidizer it will shine, I'm almost certain.
    I think the model less easy to find is"CHOBILLON" where the label "MADE IN FRANCE". I can not seem to find these model and the uniface silver model.
    It would be nice that Rob gives his opinion.
    Regards
    Jean-Michel
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Jim,

    There is a photo of a very similar Belgian vic on the sammler.ru site with the link in post #41 on page 3 of this thread. The Google translation is here http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsammler.ru%2Findex.php%3Fshowtopic%3D115165%26st%3D0%26%23entry1388950

    No Paul Dubois and the strange flattened back to the rather square suspension.

    Bill

    Edited by Bilco
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Happy New Year to you Bill and to All other members.

    Bill, I saw this photo before but I also noted the tool or file marks on the back of the half ball and rim of this medal.

    The first question I have to ask myself is why would someone make such a thin suspension? Second, why is there no tool marks on the front half of the ball?

    If you look very close at the suspension ball on the reverse side or the flat side of the medal you exampled, you will see that the hole was drill so close to the side wall that the metal is almost lettings go because of the thinness of the metal left behind after the drilling. This is very common when you start with a large object then you start filing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Jim,

    Yes, the sammler.ru suspension is odd. There is a close-up shot of it:

    sammlerbelgsuspension.jpg

    It looks like the suspension lug (it's too odd a shape to call a ball) is part of the planchet rather than soldered or welded on, and there is a lip on the top edge of it that must have been made after the filing was done. So, I wondering if the sequence of making it was:

    1. make the blank with suspension lug

    2. file the suspension lug flat on the back

    3. put the blank in the die and strike the medal, producing the lip on the top edge of the lug

    4. drill the hole through the lug - too close to the back, so raising the bump across the lug

    The medal on eBay also seems to have the suspension lug integral with the planchet - indeed, there seems to be a plinth under the lug, much as the British Type 2 has. The lug was either made much more square than the sammler.ru one or filed to that shape.

    It's a shame we don't know if there are any markings on the edge of these 2 medals. I can't see 'LA' or 'R' marks on them either, and there is no PAUL DUBOIS on the obverse. There doesn't seem to be a suspension like these in Jean-Michel's collection or anything like it in Laslo so the question is - what are they?

    Bill

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To me it is hard to modify a medal without it being too obvious to most collectors. That is why I believe you see different suspension a more likely way to make something look a little rarer. And, since we do not know how it came to be, I look at it with caution and ask "why not a simple ball suspension" as it is easier to make that way?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Bill, Jim, Jean

    Happy new year!


    I saw, I think it is strange medals "rare" this kind of "defect". , There seems to be a series production, but modified by some individual .. That ha become so rare? I think not. I think, that the price and value for this example.

    I still have as a reference, the type described by sr. Laslo.

    Lambert

    "An original piece is not for what it is but by what it is not ..."

    Edited by lambert
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi all,
    The suspension of this model is not welded like the English model. There are no inscriptions.
    For cons, I am of the opinion that LAMBERT is a model that was produced in series and certainly Czchoslovakia.
    I have not yet in my collection! :whistle:
    Regard
    Jean-Michel
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here is one of my other Belgian VM in original case, but one strange thing is that I can't find any makers mark??????Nothing!!!!!!!!!!How may I classify this one?

    16anm05.jpg

    Edited by peron
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Peron,
    Your diploma is interesting because the grant date is of 19 August 1919 and the Decree of 14 July 1919.
    Similarly, I do not know him what type of degree.
    I think Belgium as France has a variety of forms of degree.
    However, in France there is a regulatory model, the others are not regulatory.
    By cons, is there a regulatory model delivering for Belgium?
    What Says the decree?
    Regard
    Jean-Michel
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Peron,
    Your diploma is interesting because the grant date is of 19 August 1919 and the Decree of 14 July 1919.
    Similarly, I do not know him what type of degree.
    I think Belgium as France has a variety of forms of degree.
    However, in France there is a regulatory model, the others are not regulatory.
    By cons, is there a regulatory model delivering for Belgium?
    What Says the decree?
    Regard
    Jean-Michel

    Here is a close up of the text in the brevet...& what about my medal in post#72? the absence of any marks? Is there any variant without any markings?anyone????

    2hhjbs4.jpg

    Edited by peron
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Peron,

    Your medal appears to have PAUL DUBOIS on the obverse so, if there is no LA or R anywhere, nor any markings on the edge, I'd say it is an Official Type 1 - especially as it comes from a supplier in Brussels.

    Bill

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Peron,

    Your medal appears to have PAUL DUBOIS on the obverse so, if there is no LA or R anywhere, nor any markings on the edge, I'd say it is an Official Type 1 - especially as it comes from a supplier in Brussels.

    Bill

    My medal only has the Paul Dubois signature, I look everywere and cannot found any other markings...do anyone knows the supllier on the label box????

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Jim,

    Yes, the sammler.ru suspension is odd. There is a close-up shot of it:

    sammlerbelgsuspension.jpg

    It looks like the suspension lug (it's too odd a shape to call a ball) is part of the planchet rather than soldered or welded on, and there is a lip on the top edge of it that must have been made after the filing was done. So, I wondering if the sequence of making it was:

    1. make the blank with suspension lug

    2. file the suspension lug flat on the back

    3. put the blank in the die and strike the medal, producing the lip on the top edge of the lug

    4. drill the hole through the lug - too close to the back, so raising the bump across the lug

    The medal on eBay also seems to have the suspension lug integral with the planchet - indeed, there seems to be a plinth under the lug, much as the British Type 2 has. The lug was either made much more square than the sammler.ru one or filed to that shape.

    It's a shame we don't know if there are any markings on the edge of these 2 medals. I can't see 'LA' or 'R' marks on them either, and there is no PAUL DUBOIS on the obverse. There doesn't seem to be a suspension like these in Jean-Michel's collection or anything like it in Laslo so the question is - what are they?

    Bill

    This medal is mine. No inscriptions.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Oliver,

    Many thanks for the response about this very interesting medal. What are your feelings about it - is it an altered Official Type 1 or does the suspension look original? Do you have any ideas about where it came from? Maybe you could let us know the diameter and thickness of the planchet to compare with other versions?

    Bill

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello,
    There are two markings that can be found for a medal "January-Berchot".
    You will notice that the size of the marking is different.
    Regards
    Jean-Michel

    Hi!

    Why marking "January-Berchot"?

    And I think the Belgian medals marking - a triangle and the letter «AC» (Establissements Adrean Chobillon)

    oliver860

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.