Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    GMU

    Active Contributor
    • Posts

      119
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      3

    Posts posted by GMU

    1. On 16/04/2023 at 10:01, saschaw said:

      Your medal, Tommy, seems fine to me. Probably not an awarded one, but a (more or less) contemporary wearers' copy. It looks die-struck and of proper coining quality... much different than all those modern fakes flooding ebay and flea markets...

       

       

      This, however, looks a bit odd, to be honest, but it's probably the pictures... is it bronze, steel, or silver?!

       

      :wacky:

       


      Potos are not that great because of bad lighting. Piece is made of bronze.

       

      67635-C7-B-4-BE0-4638-BFC7-DF899-BBCE0-A

    2. On 10/12/2022 at 16:57, Daniel Cole said:

       My SCG medal also had an incorrect date clasp…

      That is correct. Richthofen’s SCG date clasp was certainly unique. It was a 1916 date clasp with two banderoles showing the date and month of the action for his award ( Nov 9, 1916). However, the banderole  shows 11 and 11.

       

      here is a close up of MvR’s SCG award

       

      6-DC2-A666-7-F7-C-42-E1-A240-53888316-B6

      Regarding the Saxe Coburg Gotha award, I have been able to improve the piece from the one I had posted before. I was able to find a SCG with the correct 1916 swords clasp, but no banderoles ….

       

      BFB32C98-9EE7-487A-BEB5-789A23F1963A.jpg

       

      C248DA53-95D2-451C-B173-E78EE8E87045.jpg

    3. On 09/12/2022 at 09:48, filfoster said:

      Here is my re-do of the uniform he wore to a friend's wartime wedding (sadly, all repro):

      Very nice display congratulations. I still need to get an Ulanka from Manfred v Richthofen's regiment.  I have an original Ulanka that belonged to Rittmeister Alfred Schmidt, Reg Nr 18.

       

      u23mu.jpg

       

      Photo_Sep_25,_6_05_25_PM.jpg

       

       

      u65oi.jpg

       

      On 10/12/2022 at 16:57, Daniel Cole said:

      Beautiful. That is a labor of love for sure.  I did it once myself, however I never got the PLM and RAO3X.  I substituted a S&L PLM and original RAO4x.  My SCG medal also had an incorrect date clasp.  I also never found the other Turkish medal, Fun project.  Well done.

       

      I ended up disassembling the ribbon bar I had constructed and returned the decorations to their original ribbons.

      1Dan's Medals 011.jpg

      Thanks Daniel, I remember your display very well.  Yes, those pieces are hard to get. A long time ago, while talking about my project with the late Neal W O' Connor, he told me that the hardest piece to come by was the RAO3KrX. Wow was he right! It took me a long, long time, to pick up one. Very scarce piece indeed.

    4. On 10/08/2021 at 15:48, Deutschritter said:

       

      Did you ever get a complete list? To the right of the Südwest-Afrika Denkmünze I can see the Kolonial-Denkmünze.

       

      Hello, I am sorry for the very late response. This information is what I have gathered so far.

       

      awards-list.jpg

       

      J Bishoff's PLM and medal bar:

       

      jb-decorations.jpg

       

      This is the only photo I have of him wearing a medal bar. This appeared in a 1920 newspaper covering his involvement in the Kapp-Putsch.

       

      JB.jpg

       

      I do not know if he is wearing  the same medal bar that came with his estate.

    5. On 22/12/2020 at 17:10, Schießplatzmeister said:

      Hello GMU,

      This case (and what is in it) is my personal favorite!

      Congratulations regarding owning such a beautiful and historically significant item.

      Best regards,

      Thank you very much! It is indeed an awesome little beauty!


       

      42-D41556-8-BD7-448-A-AF64-4-D5-E3-C1295

       

       

      21 hours ago, VtwinVince said:

      No kidding, who is the recipient of that beauty?

      Vince. It was last received by Felix Graf von Bothmer.

    6. 23 hours ago, Deruelle said:

      Hi

      You are right about the chronological numbers in the Kramer's book. Like Wilhelm Ritter von Reitzenstein has the number one he should be the first to received the MJ3. This is not the case. he was in fact the 23rd officer to receive it. Ritter von Kaufmann has got number 24 and was the 21st officer to receive the MJ3. Don't forget that there are several award dates. The validation date, which is the date of the diploma. The date of official reception when the decoration is awarded to the officer and the date of ennoblement

      The validation date of Kaufmann is 26 August 1914. He received it on 21 May 1915 and became Ritter von on 12 July 1915.

      I know that in Munich there is a list with all officers and matricule on the ring. This list is secret to prevent possible counterfeiting.

      Years ago I have posted my list here, you can make research easily.

      Christophe

      Thank you Christophe and Sandro. I had seen this wonderful thread with the list of recipients. As a matter of fact, I searched everywhere to see If I find the list with Matrikelnummern and recipients, but could not find any such thing.

      For example von Epps MJ3 numbered 286 was awarded two times before him, once in the 1800’s. Kramer list this as MMJO Nr. 118

      So, any idea on how to research a particular piece, say 286, and come up with the name of its 3 recipients? I would really like some help with this.

      One more thing, all MJ3’s were numbered, and this number was unique right? I mean there were no two number X repeated Right?

      it seems that the low numbered pieces that I have seen like 1, 33, etc, all were WW1 manufacture. So would this mean that there was no number 1, 33, etc produced in the 1800,s , or that the piece was no longer available, and a WW1 piece made to replace it?

      In the case of von Epp’s the 1800 build piece was passed among 3 holders. However, could it be true that MJ3 number 1 was made two times. The 1800’s piece which at sometime became unavailable thus needing a 1914 piece also marked 1.

      this is really confusing to me. I wish I could learn more....

       

       

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.