Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Paul L Murphy

    Old Contemptible
    • Posts

      2,123
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      3

    Posts posted by Paul L Murphy

    1. Paul,

      Thank you for this thread. It is useful to have provenanced and dated pieces then there can be no doubt of the date of manufacture and one can base dating information on fact rather than conjecture (and I know it is very easy to have a theory and then create hypothetical information based on that.). Interestingly I see that some of the early awards are to Chinese Customs officials. Why would they have received them. I know they usually ended up with Double-Dragons or later Golden Grains, classes depending on rank, where the helping the Japanese to get things in to China that shouldn't have been there?

      All the best,

      Paul

      Paul,

      Both Bredon and Maze had a number of Chinese orders, which were sold at the same time. It seems to have been not uncommon for Europeans in senior Chinese posts to receive Japanese orders at that time. I have a Rising Sun 3rd class which was awarded to Theophile Piry when he held a senior position in the Chinese postal service and was involved in negotiating a postal accord between China and Japan.

      Regards,

      Paul

    2. See, now this is interesting. I've always been led to believe that the ones WITH rivets were WWII and prior, and that awards once re-issuance occurred were plain as were some late-war pieces, no rivets or screws! This one is obviously riveted. Either my belief is WRONG (at least partially), or there was a mixing of medal types. That medal also appears to have a hallmark - Paul, are you sure you're showing us the correct medal for this gentlemen? If it is correct, could it be one that was never awarded prior to the war's end, and safely survived only toy be awarded in 1967?? Scratching head....

      Yes, it is Bramstedt's. This suggests that the move to two screw and rivetless reverses must have taken place after 1967. My purpose in starting this thread is to get known dated awards and see if we can construct a proper timeline which will withstand scrutiny.

    3. The first letter acknowledges his request for permission to accept and wear the award, and seems to suggest that getting this permission should be straight forward. Apologies that they are too small to read but I seem to be able to make them either this size or too large to upload !

      The second letter is the final reply basically saying bah-humbug you cannot wear the order so stick it in the drawer out of sight !

    4. Next we have the 3rd Class award to Sir Frederick William Maze.

      http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_01_2012/post-1487-0-88976000-1326324868.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_01_2012/post-1487-0-10766700-1326324883.jpg

      It was awarded to him in April 1920 when he was working in the Chinese Customs.

      Maze's medals and orders (mainly Chinese) were sold by his family in 2011. The following post shows some interesting letters relating to his award.

    5. Next up we have the 3rd Class award to Colonel Charles Vernon Hume.

      http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_01_2012/post-1487-0-82278900-1326324508.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_01_2012/post-1487-0-26094600-1326324559.jpg

      This was awarded to him in 1906 for service as a British military attache with the Japanese Army in Manchuria during the Russo Japanese War.

    6. First up we have this one.

      http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_01_2012/post-1487-0-07031500-1326323919.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_01_2012/post-1487-0-14221500-1326323932.jpg

      This is the 2nd Class award to Robert Bredon. It was awarded on 24th July 1903. At that time he was the Deputy Inspector General of the Imperial Chinese Customs. His orders and medals (including a lovely Defense of Legations 1900 Chinese War Medal) were sold at auction in the UK some time ago.

      His award certificate is numbered 1,636, which shows how few foreigners were awarded the Sacred Treasure up to then.

    7. I think everyone will agree that one of the most controversial things at the moment is the dating of the various Japanese orders, ie when individual pieces were made and what characteristics collectors can use to identify the timeframe of the item in question.

      Therefore let us follow Rich's advice from a much earlier post and go back to source information, putting aside all accumulated knowledge and opinions. In this thread I would like people to post examples of the Sacred Treasure where the date of the award can be proven without doubt. Essentially this will mean orders which come with the original documents (and where we can be comfortable that they have not been victim of a mix-and-match process), is clearly shown in a photo being worn (not ideal since photo quality can make it difficult to pick out the fine details) or is otherwise attributable to a specific individual whose date of award is known.

      I suggest we keep this thread to the bare bones of these "proven" awards and have our general discussion and chat about the thread in a separate thread, that will just make it easier to follow.

    8. Hope it will help you, because it didn’t help me :lol:

      Anyway it’s nice that you made a photo comment (at last!) about my kite classification.

      Although your timing for this comment looks kinda strange :lol:

      Nick,

      The timing of my comments is only dicatated by when I can get time away from work and family to indulge my hobbies ! Recently work has been taking up far too much time so hobbies have suffered as a result.

      The photo montage that you did would suggest that neither of the Kites are the Type 1 in your classification, although I accept it is hard to be definite with small photos like this. Hence, given that they both appear to be awards for 1894-95 (since the officer's in question have no war medal other than that one) the evidence thus far does not support the classification.

      Where did you get the photo of the Kite you used to illustrate your Type 1 and what makes you think that it was from the Meiji period ?

      Paul

    9. Rich,

      Could the scarcity of Pillars be attributable to it being used akin to the Sacred Treasure and therefore often being used as a long service award ? Given the short timeframe of Manchuria, there would have been more awards for "merit" in setting the place up than there would have been for long service. What are your views ?

      Cheers,

      Paul

    10. I have the following observations : -

      - I have always made it clear that I only ever apply this to the 7th and 8th classes so the "analysis" of the higher classes is superfluous since it does not work as a dating tool, nor has anyone ever suggested that it does;

      - It is useful to place medals into a general timeline, ie Meiji, Taisho or Showa. It is not something that you can use to place them into 10 year time slots !

      - You set photos beside each other that are clearly not perfectly aligned nor taken from the same distance. Hence drawing a straight line across them to show where the vein cuts that line is not accurate.

      - You do not set out the basis on which you date the examples that you have used to illustrate your opinion. How are you certain that the medals fall into the dates that you allocate for them ?

      I look forward to the day when someone can positively date the different dies used to make the various Japanese orders but any approach to doing this needs to either be a very general one, which is the method I have adopted in the absence of hard facts to support a different approach, or else it should be a scholarly one along the lines used by numismatists to properly attribute ancient coins etc to different time periods/mints.

      What you are suggesting lacks rigor since you are making sweeping statements about the dates of the pieces being used without providing the proof that supports your theory. Please set out the reasons for your comfort with the dates and then we will have the material for an excellent debate on this subject.

      Regards,

      Paul
    11. I suspect the RC ordered them from a number of different makers. It is possible that they switched back to the Mint at that time since it was cost effective or they needed a higher volume since they were awarding more. It is a pity that it does not say anything about the material used, ie silver or aluminum.

    12. I have never read before that there was a restriction on people receiving both Manchurian orders. It is quite strange when you consider that receipt of the Sacred Treasure and Rising Sun was very common in Japan, especially for military officers. Can anyone find an example of a document group to the same individual which contains both awards ?

    13. No disrespect Paul, but I am glad to see an old custom revived, instead of inventing something new.

      Thanks for showing the badge, new style!

      The idea to re-introduce the old badge came from the Assistant Curator of the Guards Museum, Gary Gibbs. He put forward the idea almost two years ago and it was finally approved in time for the royal wedding.

      The only photos I can find with it in use are subject to Crown Copyright so I do not want to reproduce them here. However if you google William Mott in the images option there are photos of it being worn, as well as a photo of the Master Tailor stitching it onto the tunic.

      A new badge has also been made for wear on the greatcoat and I hope to be able to get a photo of that later this week.

    14. He is more commonly known in the Household Division as "God's unofficial representative on earth" ! The Garrison Sergeant Major of London Division has now got a new rank badge which harks back to the Victorian era. It was first worn by the present holder of this office, RSM Mott of the Welsh Guards, at the recent royal wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.

      The badge is the large royal arms, as worn by Guards RSMs, on a four bar chevron. Initially it was thought that they could use the four bar chevron currently used for band masters, however when they tried it the chevrons were at the wrong angle to best display the badge. Hence the master tailor in Wellington Barracks made new four bar chevrons at a different angle. Only five badges were made so this is not something that will find its way onto ebay anytime soon !

      It is probably the most impressive modern rank badge that I have ever seen so enjoy !

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.