Brian Wolfe

Nice. I suppose it would be quicker to list who didn't use this one. This is the British Land Pattern Musket (aka Brown Bess), isn't it? Regards Brian

Both my wife and I are more interested in the Fenian Raids than the War of 1812 as well. She has the Canadian General Service Medal part of the collection and I must say I am impressed wih her medal collection. Here's to cross border shopping and historical interest friendships. Regards Brian

Gladly, however, you seemed to have already arrived at the only logical conclusion to any discussion we might have on the subject. In reality, we can discuss a war between our two countries (even though we didn't become a nation until 1867), accept the other fellow's opinion as his right to his own opinion, and part as friends. If that isn't something both sides can be proud of, I'm not sure what is. Sounds like everyone, except the First Nations, won. Regards Brian

I'll stay clear of the debate, being a Canuck, and simply say that this is a very nice specimen. I wouldn't worry about the "serious" collectors, they will always find examples of what they need for their collections. Regards Brian

A wonderful job of remounting, Mervyn. I too would like to hear more about this group. As Dante has asked, "What are the clues" and I'd like to also know the conclusions you have drawn. In your original post you mentioned that this is a lesson that medals are not something to be played with. Is there a specific story to this statement concerning this particular group? Regards Brian

You could not have picked more iconic firearms to represent the Old West than the Colt 45 "Peacemaker" and the Winchester 73. They were "the best of the west". I hope someone will show the Navy Colt as well. This is already a post that generates dreams for me of future collecting conquests. Your comment about being a time when it was alright to shoot the badguy is spot on. Back when I was a kid and all of the Western movies were in black and white it seemed that the world was indeed more "black and white" regarding what was right and what was wrong. Now almost all movies are shot in colour and the world is "gray". Thanks for posting a couple of firearm greats. Regards Brian

Hi Irish, I had a feeling that you would be the one to answer the question. I didn't expect that you would answer the hole card so completely. I'm going to go with Deadwood and say it was the Queen of Clubs. Well done. Regards Brian

Remington Derringer Mod.95 To me nothing screams frontier gambler like a derringer. Whether on the riverboats plying their trade along the mighty Mississippi or in a smoke filled saloon of a dusty frontier town the professional gambler would not be far away. There is nothing like a good game of five card draw poker or a turn at craps to put some life in a cowpoke’s break from the drudgery of a cattle drive while in town for the night. Not too far away would be the gambler’s friend, his trusty derringer, to persuade a cowhand that the loss of his hard earned wages was secondary to the risk of the loss of his life; if he questioned the honesty of the game. Actually these were sold more to the ladies than to gamblers. One of these secreted away in a purse, the folds of a dress or in the furry hand warmer was just the ticket to make life outside of the home a little safer. The hand warmers were referred to as a “muff” therefore the term often applied to a small concealable pistol was a “muff gun”. Gentlemen also carried these pocket pistols for protection so even though they remind me of the frontier gambler their use was more often by the upper class ladies and gentlemen. This particular example is the Remington Model 95 double-barreled pocket pistol, or derringer, in .41 cal. rim-fire. Remington made derringers for around 70 years starting in 1866. This specimen has a cartridge extractor which is a feature added in 1869 and the inscription on the barrel rib reads “REMINGTON ARMS CO. ILION N.Y.” which first appeared in 1888 and then changed in 1910. Therefore this specimen would have been made, by my reckoning, sometime between 1888 and 1910. Now for the question, keeping in mind that to me these are iconic of the old west saloon gambling table, what is the down card in the photo? I’ll start the clock now to see who gets the answer first. Good luck. Regards Brian

Iconic Firearms I thought it might be fun to start a thread where the members could post their opinions of what they think are iconic firearms. As you can see from what I think is “fun” that I don’t get out much. There are objects in the world that the very sight of them on the television or in magazines says everything. For example if you see the Eiffel Tower you might automatically think, “Paris” or at least “France”. Of course if you were an aluminum siding sales person you might wonder when they are going to finish it and offer to give the French Government an estimate. Visual objects are such a powerful statement that any movie to do with extraterrestrial invasions always shows these buildings. One must ask why it is that every flying saucer seems to crash into the dome of the American Congress building or tips over the Eiffel Tower. Seriously, no offence to the French people or their country but you have to admit that according to the movies alien visitors do seem to have a problems with avoiding it. What I am asking you to post are those firearms that you consider iconic, that remind you of some era, event or place. In fact let’s expand on this and say any of your favourite firearms. There is no correct or wrong answer; it is your opinion. This can be from your collection or even a photo out of a book. If you use a photo from a book please give the title and author’s name so we don’t get into trouble with the copyright people. Just for the “gunners” in our midst, Irish or otherwise, let’s add the really big guns and include artillery pieces. I’ll kick this section off with my next post, let’s see what we can come up with to rival the medal guys. In addition to the item in my next post there is a bit of a quiz that goes with it for those of you who are up for some historical sleuthing, so good luck. Regards Brian

Hello Terry, Thank you for setting the record and me straight. I can see very well what you are saying about the difference in your last photo. No need to bother with a photograph of the Martini-Henry, I see no reason to doubt you and I certainly was not looking to start an argument, simply a matter of me being mistaken. Me being mistaken, imagine that, now there's an all too common event. Thanks again for posting your material and correcting the record. Regards Brian

Hello Terrylee, A very nice grouping of weapons, thanks for sharing them with the membership. Some additional information on the bayonets: The Naval Cutlass Bayonet pattern 1858 had the rifle ring "bushed" to fit the Martini Henry rifle in 1873. A later pattern 1875 was issued with the rifle ring the "correct" diameter for the Martini-Henry. The saw backed bayonet is the Artillery Sword-bayonet pattern 1875, some of these were later cut down and the saw teeth removed for use in trench fighting in WWI. The shorter bayonet is the pattern 1887 Mk III (no fuller in the blade) and were designed specifically for the Mk. IV Martini-Henry rifle. This is a cut down of the longer 1887 Mk III and would have normally been used in trench warfare. When I say "normally" I mean use by the British forces and of course we are now talking about weapons that may not have fit that regulation completely. The shorter rifle would normally be an artillery pattern as there would not have "normally" been a device for a bayonet. The general rule of thumb being that the calvary would not have a need for a bayonet as they carried swords. In this case I'm assuming these were for mounted infantry, therefore the need for bayonets. The leather rear sight guard is something that is hard to find and this one looks original. Thanks again for an interesting post. Regards Brian

The Crescent Lamp Before we leave the Crescent Lamp, (ok, who just said “finally!’?), I’d like to touch on the ventilation for this lamp. At the bottom, in the back, are a number of holes to allow air to enter the combustion chamber. Without proper ventilation we would not have much of a lamp. At the top is the chimney which completes the ventilation system as in all lamps and lanterns. However another innovative feature of the Crescent Lamp is that this is detachable to allow it to be cleaned and if necessary, replaced due to damage. There is a pin located at the rear of the chimney, as may be seen in the photo below, which, when withdrawn, allows the whole chimney assembly to be removed for whatever purpose is necessary. This pretty well covers the Crescent Lamp. The next, and final, fuel combustion example is a unique specimen that I do not believe to be very common, especially in the condition and completeness as it will be presented.

Not ot be picky but that would be "Governor General" of Canada. I believe he held that position in the mid 1920s. I can not get over how these photos look after they have been colourized. It is an art, or some sort of dark magic, they are beautiful and certainly bring the whole subject to life. Thnaks for sharing them with the membership. Regards Brian

Many thanks for the information Dave, it is most useful. I apologize that I didn’t respond to you sooner, it is a good lesson not only to me but others on the forum that one should never be too busy to thank fellow members who have taken the time to share their knowledge and make this a member-friendly forum. Thanks again, I really do appreciate you taking the time to assist me. Regards Brian

HI Peter, I take it that there is not yet pitting associated with this rust and it is more surface rust than anything? There is a product called Conservator's Wax that was sold by Lee Valley a number of years ago that I've used with great success on surface rust on blades. It is a wax cleaner and polish. Regards Brian

Hi Peter, That's an interesting feature, any chance of a photo? Regards Brian

The Crescent Lamp The burner itself is quite unique compared with other styles of police lanterns. This particular burner fits into the lantern by sliding it into two rails in the bottom of the lantern that correspond with their opposite number on the bottom of the burner. This would prevent the burner from rattling around while in use and certainly if the lantern were to be accidently tipped on its side the burner would stay in place The whole burner may be removed for filling and or cleaning by the use of a wire ring mounted on the top of the oil reservoir tank. The back of the oil tank has a very unique feature; there is a plate with groves running horizontally and vertically to provide a surface to strike a match to light the burner. I have never been a smoker but I have been out in the bush hunting on wet, rainy days when finding a dry rough surface to strike a match for the lunch camp fire can be an issue. If you are not too soaked through there is always a zipper somewhere but one must remember that before zippers people only have had buttons as clothing fasteners. It is easy to see that the lantern was designed by someone who had seen service and not an engineer lacking practical experience. No slight to engineers is intended.

The Crescent Lamp Continuing on with our look at the Crescent Lamp we’ll look at the lamp’s burner chamber. In the first photo we can see the convex reflector which is affixed to the door of the lantern. In the usual style of lantern found this reflector is found at the back of the lamp chamber and relies on the curve of the lamp body to give it a convex shape and therefore it is able to better concentrate the light. One of the disadvantages of the older style reflectors is that they are hard to polish, especially if your hand is larger. The Crescent Lamp reflector is convex on all planes where in the usual design of lanterns the reflector is convex only on the one axis while the other is flat, or straight. I probably should have mentioned the door itself as this is probably the very first thing anyone would notice about the Crescent Lamp. The door not only allows access to the reflector but also to the oil burner itself. I hope by this point you can appreciate what an innovation this lamp was over its competition. It probably also begs the question, “How can a grown man get so excited about an old police oil lamp?” Of course if you stayed with this post this far you can answer that question yourself.

Hi Larry, That's it! Many, many thanks. Regards Brian

Hi Nick, Thanks, but no it was the writing on the box lids. I know I saw it somewhere and it had to be here on the GMIC as I don't visit any other forums. Unless it was somewhere on the internet and if so I have no hope of finding that link again, It may be Lost in (Cyber) Space. Regards Brian

Hello Heho, Welcome to the GMIC. I regret to inform you that Ed no longer visits us here but he can be reached, if you so desire, at Sagongs forum. Regards Brian

There was a post a while back that showed the three different emperor's names found on the medal boxes and I cannot seem to find it now. If anyone remembers which post had that information it would be most helpful, I know is was part of a post that I believe started out as a different topic. I usually print off such information and put it in my files but didn't this time. Thanks for any assistance you can give me, it is most appreciated. Regards Brian

Calling this last group "nice" is an understatement. My difficulity would be which collection to house it in, German or Japanese. Thank you once again for posting these images. Regards Brian

Hi Peter, I would indeed like the burner, if you locate it, thank you very much. Some of my lanterns are missing their burners and I suspect they were taken out to be used in a work or hobby shop. Regards Brian

Hi Peter, Thanks for that conformation. I've seen the hand dipping of candles at pioneer villages but, of course, just assumed they would be using modern wick. I do hope you can locate that burner and would like very much to see a photo of it posted here. Regards Brian