Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Stuart Bates

    Past Contributor
    • Posts

      1,761
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      3

    Blog Comments posted by Stuart Bates

    1. Another example of your wit combined with humour and truth.

      Whilst I agree with you on the amount paid to sporting figures &c, I have to say what would we do without “bread and circus?” I don’t subscribe to it but what is there for the masses to do? We, as individuals, have little to offer to Earth possibly destruction, but until then what? Art? Now that is too subjective to be considered. Architecture? Once again subjective and not relevant to most people I feel. There are many more I suspect.

      In light of this heroes are necessary, warts and all.

       

    2. I always assumed that an avatar was simply the image/graphic that best illustrated one's proclivities, (oops, perhaps some synonyms are in order - penchant, preference, taste, interest, hobby - I had better leave it there).

      I have always used my name as a user-name as it seems "cheating" not to do so. As Brian says " I never use an avatar name whether here or commenting on the Internet because if I am willing to put something down in writing I am will to stand by what I say. "

      One man's fish is another's poisson.

      Stuart

    3. "Chamberlain's story is of a man who fought for peace as long as possible, and went to war only when it was the last available option. It's not such a bad epitaph." [Nick Baumann]

      This is a very interesting precis of the man called Neville Chamberlain and the situation he faced http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2013/09/neville_chamberlain_was_right_to_cede_czechoslovakia_to_adolf_hitler_seventy.html

      Stuart

    4. I am tempted by Brian's article to find out much, much more of this signature man. He may have been wrong about Adolf, and he was not alone, but what does one do with a madman? And mad he surely was. World domination is taking it a bit too far. Ressurecting one's country I can understand but at the expense of the rest of the world... NO!

      "Wet willy!" That seems rather unfair to a man who only wanted to save humanity from a repeat of the Great War - what was so "Great" about it? And never let us forget that it was Chamberlain who declared war on Germany.

      Stuart

    5. A quite marvelous article on a character who has suffered much from the "popular history" mentioned by Brian.

      It is little known that Chamberlain kept Britain out of the Spanish Civil War and that he recognised Italy's supremacy in Ethiopia in 1938, when Italy already controlled three quarters of that country. This to sway Italy away from Germany - a futile gesture as it turned out. It should also be recognised that Premier Daladier of France was complicit, if that is the correct word, in the Munich Agreement.

      It is likely that Chamberlain's desire for peace was matched with his desire to ensure that Britain was able to defend itself.

      Churchill's eulogy just about sums up the man but it does not appear that the verdict of popular history has "stood him in good stead."

      Stuart

    6. Mervyn,

      you must continue these memoirs as it is such a personal and, therefore, a fascinating insight into the life and times of a small boy during crisis.

      Don't worry too much over the readership as I am sure that many have read your story even if they have made no comment. Not too many of us take the time or make the effort to recognise such valuable insights into our collective history.

      As has been said several times, "Keep 'em coming."

      Stuart

    7. Mervyn,

      as we have discussed blogs are nothing if they have no dissenting views. Therefore I must bring up that old chestnut of area bombing with particular reference to the Allied bombings of Dresden and Hamburg. It is accepted that one cannot break the spirit of a people by such means and, indeed, your blog has amply demonstrated that fact.

      The failure to prosecute “the perpetrators” is reprehensible but, as always, pragmatism will have out, like it or not. There is no need for me to bring up the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as opposing forces will use any means at their disposal and justify it with whatever “moral” righteousness that they can bring to bear.

      It is, and will remain, a vexed issue but that does not mean that it should be “unspoken.”

      Stuart

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.