Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Ferdinand

    Valued Member
    • Posts

      1,290
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      1

    Posts posted by Ferdinand

    1. Hi Gerd,

      1. Private Pavel Nikandrovich Kotsyuba

      2. Junior Sergeant Semyon Ilyich Radchenkov

      3. Guards Senior Sergeant Ivan Petrovich Alekseyev

      4. Guards Sergeant Aleksei Fyodorovich Derevyanko

      5. Anatoly Alekseyevich Nikishkov

      6. Anna Grigoryevna Yakimets

      7. Yevgeny Aleksandrovich Kudryavtsev

      8. Galina Konstantinovna Migal

    2. 2 hours ago, Gerd Becker said:

      Amazing. I guess, posthumous awards are pretty scarce, right? I don´t remember seeing very much of them.

      They are a bit scarce, although definitely not rare. Right now I have 4 posthumous OPWs in my collection. I was able to locate the records for quite a large number of posthumous awards (see this topic). My guess is that thousands of OPWs were awarded posthumously (much more than any other award, for the obvious reason, as Volovonok stated, that before to 1977 most decorations had to be returned to the state once the recipient had died).

    3. Here's a recent addition. It was awarded posthumously to infantry Captain Aleksei Dubrovin, days after he was killed in action east of Stalino, Ukraine, in September 1943.

      dubrovin003.jpg

      dubrovin004.jpg

      On 11-7-2007 at 21:52, Gerd Becker said:

      Be careful, when you stick them together in a box, they breed :speechless1:

      That warning turned out to be quite warranted :D

      Here's another one from my breeding ground, a beautiful Fisheye / Baby variation:

      baby1.jpg

      baby2.jpg

    4. Here's another Red Star that was quite easy to link to the battle of Kursk.

       

      Quote

      Comrade Savelyev has been serving as deputy chief of the Reconnaissance Section and head of the Army Reconnaissance Unit of the 5th Guards Tank Army and has been handling his duties well.

      During the combat operations he properly organized reconnaissance missions and promptly and truthfully identified the enemy forces facing the army.

      Comrade Savelyev personally visited the units and formations to organize night patrols tasked with taking prisoners and conducting reconnaissance.

      Comrade Savelyev commands authority among the cadre members of the Reconnaissance Section. He properly organized the activities of the Army Reconnaissance Unit.

      He is dedicated to the Party of Lenin and Stalin and the socialist motherland. He deserves to be awarded the Order of the Red Star.

       

      The citation was written on or shortly before July 22, 1943, just a few days after the 5th Guards Tank Army had fought in the famous battle of Prokhorovka.

      sav1.jpg

       

      sav2.jpg

    5. Another aspect might be that most collectors simply don't care about these certificates. I own a few awards that came with a McDaniel certificate, and the only reason I don't throw the certificates in the garbage is that some future buyer might find them useful. As mentioned above, McDaniel has been known to make mistakes (I believe one of his completely erroneous conclusions about a Red Banner 6th award was illustrated in this very forum) and there are several flaws in the way he drew up his certificates.

      For the most part his information is either unclear, for example: "type 2" of a certain order - which one of the classifications in existence did he use? Or "this medal ranks in the top 95% for condition", as he decribed one of my HSU stars - what does this mean? Are 95 percent of all HSU stars out there in the same or in better condition? How is that useful information? And did he really examine all HSU stars in existence? Moreover, his analysis is way too subjective (how he describes damage) or only relevant at that specific point in time (again, damage, and in particular the amount of patina or gold plating remaining, which is subject to change over the years).

    6. Alexei Merezhko does authentications: http://home.netcom.com/~merezhko/authentications.html

      It's true that fakes are getting better and better and even some of the simple campaign medals have been copied. Nowadays you either have to study the field of Soviet phaleristics exceptionally thoroughly to make an informed decision with regard to originality before venturing into eBay territory, or you have to decide not to bother with recognizing fakes at all and only buy from trusted dealers and fellow collectors. Once you have established a network of honest fellow collectors this is actually a pretty efficient way to build up a collection.

    7. I added this Red Star to my collection a few years ago and recently got around to researching it.

      petrovsky001.jpg

      petrovsky002.jpg

      The record card says it was awarded on August 14, 1943 by Order of the 19th Tank Corps, so the date suggests it could be Kursk award. A quick look at an order of battle shows that the 19th Tank Corps was part of the Central Front, which fought in the northern sector of the Kursk bulge. So, almost definitely a Kursk award! And the citation removes all remaining doubt:

      The head of Field Repair Post nr. 90, Captain Petrovsky, has exhibited exceptional initiative, diligence, and skill in repairing and overhauling tanks that had been put out of action. During the period in which the Corps was involved in combat operations, comrade Petrovsky mobilized the men of his field repair post to fulfill their repair targets. Regardless of the time of day or night, and in any and all weather conditions, the repair crews of Field Repair Post nr. 90 sacrificed their personal time and sought to return decommissioned tanks to service in the shortest possible time. Between July 5 and 31, 1943, Field Repair Post nr. 90 carried out the following repairs:

      • Medium tank repairs: 22 T-34s, 4 Mk-2s, 8 T-60s
      • Routine tank overhauls: 23 T-34s, 7 Mk-2s, 2 T-70s

      For exceeding his repair targets and for the high quality of his repairs, comrade Petrovsky deserves the Order of the Red Star.

      July 5 is the day the battle of Kursk started, so this officer was right in the middle of it all.

    8.  

      Thanks for the reply, great stuff. Couple questions: the Soviet Navy had Generals?

      Yes, there were several shore-based service branches that used army ranks, such as the Coastal Service and, as in this case, the Engineering Service.

       

      One of the documents has a 1995 date. I assume that is an expiration date, then, since his tombstone says he died in 1992. Or is there another explanation?

      The document you're referring to says that it's "valid until March 1995".

    9. 10-15-20 years irreproachable service medals.

      medal for "combat" service (which I understand was sometimes awarded in lieu of a 10-year service medal).

      Since he received all three Impeccable Service Medals, the MCM must have been awarded for something else. I can't find anything about a Decree issued on May 10, 1970, but the date suggests it has got something to do with the 25th anniversary of victory in the war.

       

      The medals are all rather common, but the paperwork, the fact that he was a Major General, and the further research possibilities make this a pretty nice group. I'd say the set is worth about $200,

       

      Here's a picture of his headstone: http://spb-tombs-walkeru.narod.ru/2013/6/28.htm

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.