Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Richard Gordon

    Past Contributor
    • Posts

      1,183
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    Posts posted by Richard Gordon

    1. Probably a Hauptmann who entered service shortly before March 1897 to qualify for the Centenary.  Promoted Hauptmann/Rittmeister around 1912 and not enough service to get a Red Eagle yet.  If you look at the 1914 rank list, you will see that most captains with that seniority don't have a Red Eagle yet.  So 17 years or so of service before the war, and with Doppelrechnung of the war years, enough time to qualify for the Dienstauszeichnungskreuz before being mustered out around 1920 as a Major.  And if he served in a purely Prussian regiment with no Inhaber or other connection to another state, he easily could have missed out on foreign or other state awards.  Though we get excited over bars with interesting combinations of awards, mainly because of the chance of researching them, his combination is actually probably quite typical for the average officer of his rank.  

      ​Thanks Dave!

    2. Very nice bar. I love these clean fracks.

      This guy was likely too young for the FP war - he joined the service in the late 1800s. He was eligible for the Centenary medal because he was there in 1897.

      ​Thanks, Brian. I just wasn't sure of the criteria.

      Nice EK2 probably marked S-W with the "Type B14" core -- a core which is basically identical to Godet's famous 1870 Type B but with a new obverse date (1914).

      ​I never really paid that much attention to the EK2 to be honest. Going to look more closer at it tonight!

      Lovely medal bar.

      ​Thanks!

      What is also interesting is what is NOT on the bar i.e. Red Eagle Order, Crown Order or any WWI German decoration besides the EK2. This guy was either a very low preforming officers or a General with high orders around the neck.

      ​I would imagine the former. Surely a general would have much more awards than this?

    3. I need to read this thread completely but without photos showing it makes it hard to follow. While I'm waiting for the photos I'll post this...was on eBay not that log ago:

      _571_zps45d750c1.jpg

      _572_zps23b0e829.jpg

       

      I think when I discussed this on a Spanish forum, the consensus was that only the swords were made by Deschler and had been added to the cross but the cross itself was from another maker. Is that correct that Deschler was not a maker of the 4th class?

    4. Trevor, thanks for sharing what you know of the Juncker/AWS connection. I didn't think there were other factors such as others using their part and or tooling.

      Brian, It is a nice cross but the soldering is a bit sloppy around the hinge as noted in the photographs. I would imagine this one was never awarded nor worn in combat. It looks like a post 1918 creation.

      With iron crosses of various types it is amazing how some of the most desired are actually not that well made like the Juncker RK and some are a bit ugly like the core of the KMST EK1.

       

      Rich

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.