-
Posts
162 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by Norm F
-
It's a long story, but these KM clasps are attributed to Juncker, not Klein, as the manufacturing characteristics match the "non-Klein" one-piece Heer clasps (which forensically shares some pin characteristics with the Juncker EK1 clasps) and also the Luftwaffe one-piece clasps for which Juncker-labelled packaging exists. Not surprising given Juncker's status for higher end orders. They're Tombak. Material restrictions in late wartime didn't apply to the higher orders (hence no zinc German Crosses) There's only one manufacturer of the KM clasp known, but two variations based upon the trimming characteristics. The "earlier" one, "Type 1" as alluded to by Hubert in an earlier post, has variable hand-cut internal cutouts whereas the "Type 2" (same die characteristics) used a standardized trimming die for the internal cutouts. Best regards, ---Norm
-
Very nice to see a mini in wear! Of all the minis that exist, it makes sense that there would be the greatest chance of seeing a Blockade Breaker mini in wear since they were awarded to civilians. I've often wondered why it's near impossible to find photos of other KM badge minis in wear, and I can only assume it's because in wartime there was virtually no opportunity for a sailor to be off for an extended leave in cvilian clothes to wear such a thing. Best regards, ---Norm
-
Hi Larry, He's also wearing his ribbon bar with the WW1 EK2 and KVK2 so quite a record there. From the look of him and his wife he could be in his 40's and have been a teenager in WW1 -- maybe a career Navy guy? And he could be wearing his blue uniform since he's stepping out with his wife. Best regards. ---Norm
-
Hm. I can't read that article without spending a couple of days with a dictionary and using Google translate doesn't make much sense out of it, but for what it's worth the "tone" of the Google translation seemed highly sarcastic? Perhaps Nick or someone else can paraphrase it for us? Best regards, ---Norm
-
Hi Guys, I believe we can say Japan without a shadow of a doubt. Not only is the design and manufacture of the badge uniquely different from any German made war badge, but the only two photos seen to date showing the badge in wear (posted by Monsun) were both taken in Japan. The clincher is the information on this reference website on silver hallmarks around the world, http://www.925-1000.com/foreign_marks2.html , an excerpt of which I've attached here which shows that between 1928 and 1954 Japan used the "STERLING" mark. Best regards, ---Norm
-
Hi Guys, On close comparison of Monsun's second portrait photo with Martin's Schwerin and Japanese Hilfskreuzer badges, I think we can definitely say it's another example of the Japanese badge in wear. Despite the differences in angle, you can see key areas that correspond with the Japanese badge like the high eagle's head, lack of post at the stern, tall bottom wreath ribbon and matching position of the lines of longitude. Best regards, ---Norm
-
Kriegsmarine KM Helmet photo.
Norm F replied to Martin W's topic in Germany: Third Reich: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Equipment
Hi Martin, Great portrait! Here's a photo of my Dad (in the centre) during basic training in 1936 in Stralsund in the field grey uniforms with helmets. Notice their uniforms didn't have the national eagle on them. Best regards, ---Norm -
Hi Erik, As Gordon says, a perfectly original uncommon variant which I believe is earlier than the usual version. Ironically, the trigger for your observation was incorrect. The zincer on page 276 in fact has the usual "dot-less" mark but there happens to be bubble in the finish slightly higher than than the location of the dot in the variant mark which gives the false impression of an intentional dot. In fact, the variant mark with dots doesn't occur on the zinc badges. But all good, since it made you go and get your good Schwerin out of your fake drawer! Also, in actuality the variant mark with dots is not missing the period after "AUSF"as you suspected -- it's simply worn on your example. Another difference in the variant mark though, aside from the dots before both "BERLIN"s, is that the "E"s in Berlin are more level in the early variant than in the usual mark. Finally, the variant badges always seem to have the dome head of the hinge pin oriented to the left. On the conventional badge it is oriented in either direction but the vast majority of the time to the right. So there you have it. This is variation 1.1.3 in our Minesweeper Classification Table. Best regards, ---Norm
-
Very nice tallies! My Dad served on both the BREMSE and the METEOR -- on the BREMSE in 1939 during the filming of a movie in which dummy funnels were added to the ship to impersonate the H.M.S. AMPHION, and on the METEOR in 1940 when it was the floating headquarters of the B.S.O (Befehlshaber der Sicherung der Ostsee). He would have worn a BREMSE tally at one time but not a METEOR tally since he was a Leutnant by that time. Question: What's the difference between the Artillerieschulschiff Bremse tally and the Artillerieschulboot Bremse tally? Which one is earlier and why the name change? Best regards, ---Norm
-
Hi Ben, A very nice original zinc Schwerin U-boat badge. These are less common than the earlier Tombak varieties. It was never "silver" but the gilding has disappeared over time as it often does. That looks like a nice crisp photo too. Could you perhaps do a high resolution scan of the U-boat in the photo and post a magnified view? Could be very interesting. Best regards, ---Norm