Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Schießplatzmeister

    Valued Member
    • Posts

      772
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      3

    Posts posted by Schießplatzmeister

    1. Hello again:

      Chris, you bring up a good point that the piece could be a period wearing copy (Spangenstück).  I guess that this is possible, but with such copies, unless they come from the family of the veteran directly, then I would be doubtful.  This is certainly not one of the numerous more modern "copies" (really forgeries) often seen.  All that is known is that it is not an issued piece.  Proving what it is beyond that, is a rather complex issue.  In any case, I would advise collectors to stay away from such items and spend a bit more on a genuine piece.  But, some collectors are satisfied with such pieces in their collections.  It is a matter of personal taste.

      Best regards, 

    2. Hello:

      A single photo with a group does not necessarily mean that individual is the recipient of the award shown.  Documentation (Urkunden), etc. are acceptable for attributing an award.  If documentation exists, then the photographs can be considered to possibly be of the recipient of that particular award.

      The Bene Merenti piece is a really awful forgery.  There are better quality forgeries, so beware.

      The e-medals piece itself is 100% original and correct.  However, the photo is not necessarily of the recipient of that particular award.  Also, the case is incorrect.

      See this website for more information: http://www.medalnet.net/Difference.htm

      Best regards,

       

       

    3. Hello Andreas:

      My copy of the book is finally here!  It is an outstanding work by Walter Kinast.  I am certain that is was a monumental task that took many years to put all of this information in one place.  I now know that stories regarding a great many items in my collection.  The highest praise for Walter Kinast for his dedication in making this available to collectors and researchers.

      Best regards,

    4. Hello John:

      Yes they are struck from silver alloy and are original.  The ribbons are also original.  I believe that the minimum standard silver alloy for these planchets was probably 800/1000 silver as stated above.  The ribbon rings, suspension rings, and sword devices may have been made of slightly lower-silver content allow to make them harder and more durable.

      Best regards,

    5. 42 minutes ago, dedehansen said:

      I read 30 on his Epauletten, this should be Infanterie - Regiment Graf Werder No. 30,

      maybe this could help identifying him?!


      Regards
      Andreas

      Hello Andreas:

      Yes it must be IR Graf Werder No. 30 as the photo was taken in Saarlouis.  I do not see a recipient with the Adolph of Nassau RK with Swords listed in the 1902 Rangliste, nor the 1911 Rangeliste.  The photo is obviously after 1897, so he might be listed in any of the 1903-1910 Preußischen Armee Ranglisten, I don't have these in my library however.

      Best regards,

    6. Hello John:

      Here is some of the information requested:

      Baden, Wilhelm Prinz und Markgraf von. Großherzogliche Hoheit, GK awarded on 8. Januar 1871.

      Lefevre, Francois-Joseph, Herzog bon Danzig, GK awarded on 15. Juni 1808.

      Nicolaus, Zar von Rußland, GK awarded on 15. Februar 1827.

      Regarding the other Grand Duchy of Baden recipients, I probably have the information, but the names/titles provided are not specific enough (everyone was named "Carl", "Max", "Wilhelm", or a combination thereof).  I do not have a reference to dates of birth/death in my listing.  If you have more specific names/titles, I can search further.

      Best regards,

    7. An interesting question!  The original ribbon provided with the award was much longer.  The long piece provided originally was usually cut to provide either a ribbon for the uniform buttonhole for daily wear, or sometimes was used to add the award to a large medal bar for formal wear.  Thus leaving the short piece that you see.  Also, sadly, dealers will sometimes cut up a long piece (if it survived and make ribbons for awards missing ribbons).  If a recipient had the financial means, he could purchase all of the extra ribbon that he wanted.

    8. Hello Tony:

      Thank you for sharing the photo of this interesting ribbon.  It does not appear to be a PLM ribbon. It appears to have white (and not silver) stripes.   It therefore has the correct colors for an EK ribbon, however the proportions are incorrect.  It does look to be made of silk possibly and to be old.  What is the width of the ribbon?

      Best regards,

    9. 13 hours ago, ccj said:

      Nice and I am not arguing the ID. He isnt wearing a guards unifor and his straps don't look like general major straps but could be wrong.

      it's a wonderful photo  

      Hello ccj:

      You bring up a good point.  I was wondering the same thing myself!  I know very little about uniforms, but it did not look like a Generalmajor uniform to me either.  I also couldn't find the MVO award in my 1914-1918 listing of awards to any Graf von Roedern.  There were a few other von Roedern Officers listed in my 1912 Ranglist:

      Infanterie=Regiment Keith, (1. Oberschlesisches) Nr. 22, Hptm. Gr. v. Roedern

      Ulanen=Regiment Prinz August von Württemberg (Posensches) Nr. 10, Rittm. Gr. v. Roedern

      Garde=Kürassier=Regiment, Berlin, Oblt. Gr. v. Roedern

      1. Garde=Feldartillerie=Regiment, Berlin, Oblt. Gr. v. Roedern (Konstantin)

      1. Garde=Feldartiller=Regiment, Berlin, Oblt. Gr. v. Roedern (Max=Erdmann)

      Uhlanen=Regiment Kaiser Alexander III. von Rußland, (Westpreußiches) Nr. 1., Oblt. Gr. v. Roedern (Brieg)

      So, perhaps, he is one of these Officers? The mystery continues!

      Best regards,

       

       

    10. On ‎11‎/‎5‎/‎2015‎ ‎3‎:‎04‎:‎35‎, dedehansen said:

      Hi Gents,

      is it possible that this guy is Major Graf von Bothmer?

      Kind regards

      Andreas

      Hello Andreas:

      Eureka!  It took a little bit of digging to find this Officer.  He is NOT Bavarian, but is Prussian!  He is Garde=Kavallerie=Division., 1. Garde=Kavallerie=Brigade., Kom.: Gen. Maj. Gr. v. Roedern.  I found him in my 1912 Rangliste der K.P. Armee.  He was the recipient of many high awards, but here is only wearing his minimalist front for everyday duty.

      MfG,

       

    11. Hello Mike:

      A good question.  For a "civilian button ribbon bar", if I understand the question correctly, the highest award ribbon is on top (furthest from the button), with all other awards following is order of precedence, until the lowest-ranked award is at the bottom (closest to the button).  The award precedence is the same as the full-sized (large) medal bar and the field ribbon bar for military uniforms.

      I hope that this answers your question.

      Best regards,

    12. Hello!

      Maybe someone can tell me something about these two officers, please?

      unbekannt (zwei bayer. Offiziere, Orden).JPG

      Hello:

      Congratulations regarding this nice photo.  These are Bavarian Officers and the photo was taken between approximately between 1932 and 1934 in my estimation.  The Officer on the left is wearing the 1929 award for the commemoration of the 60th birthday of Kronprinzen Rupprecht.  The Officer on the right is wearing what appears to be the 1932 Jubilee medal of the 2nd Chevaulegers-Regiment "Taxis".  Neither Officer is wearing the "Ehrenkreuz des Weltkrieges".

      Best regards,

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.