Jump to content

ayedeeyew

Active Contributor
  • Content Count

    96
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About ayedeeyew

  • Rank
    Junior

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Near Bristol

Recent Profile Visitors

4,856 profile views
  1. Thanks for this - how certain are you of the spelling of the surname there? I ask as I passed this information on, and three family names that are contenders for who this is supposed to be are apparently Marks, Welch and DAVEY. I personally believe this photo pre-dates the 1930's, but not by a lot, and Davey is very close to Davis if that is just a coincidence...
  2. This was sent to me for identification, but I can't recognize what force the helmet plate is for. PC in question apparently had strong links to Somerset. Does anyone recognize what force the helmet plate is for? Thanks in advance.
  3. Have sent you a PM regarding something that may be of interest.
  4. If it's any interest, there has been a Lancaster Police example listed for sale on Ebay for a very long time: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/VICTORIAN-LANCASTER-CITY-POLICE-BADGES/174240721000?hash=item28918e6868:g:wuUAAOSwls5Y6Tya
  5. Tunics are the post-1897 pattern and the helmet plates appear to be the pre-1906 pattern with Guelphic crown, so a relatively short time span.
  6. Not on a full size medal, but it is sometimes encountered on miniature versions of the same (due to the difficulties of getting the ribbon to behave correctly on the reduced scale through the ring - most companies seem to have just enlarged the scale of the ring to compensate) :
  7. For what it's worth, my thinking is along similar lines to Alans, but with a somewhat different conclusion. I have taken the original detailed shot of the medals and tried to take out the worst of the distortion due to the angle they are worn at. There is still some, particularly on the vertical plane, but it makes life a little easier for measuring the diameter of the planchets of the medals at least. I have attached it below. The first is clearly the 1887 Jubilee Medal with 1897 clasp, no doubt there. The planchet diameter of this is 36mm. Using this as a scale when the picture is altered it is clear that the third medal appears to match this perfectly in terms of the diameter of the planchet. This would make it the 1902 Coronation Medal to me as this also had a planchet diameter of 36mm (and freshly issued/polished bronze is just as shiny as any silver medal). However, in comparison the planchet of the centre medal comes up slightly undersize on a vertical plane (perhaps 33 or 34mm if I am generous) versus maybe 30 or 31mm on the horizontal (if this medal had a swivel suspender as with both the 1887/1897 and 1902 medals this difference may be due in part to it slightly twisting to the viewers left and consequently appearing narrower). It is well known in medal collecting circles that most older copies of medals tend to come up slightly smaller than originals (generally due to them being cast from moulds taken from an original and suffering shrinkage accordingly). If the second medal is not simply something different but similar to the 1902 medal, I wonder if the second medal was not simply a copy of one? Perhaps there was some delay or such between Sergeant Bradley being issued his actual medal and as he was entitled to wear it he made other arrangements? Then when he received his actual medal he had himself proudly photographed wearing the real thing alongside his copy that was already mounted? More speculation I'm afraid...
  8. I thought I would give this another bump. I am now working on Metropolitan Police kit for both WW1 Special Constabulary and regular WW2 kit. Looking for some insignia to finish off both tunics, in particular: WW1 - Black horn KC buttons with the pie-crust edging (illustrated below). In particular the approx. 16mm diameter pocket sized ones. WW2 - Chromed/silver/white metal letters for the epaulettes and collars. For the epaulettes, separate letters M and P. For the collar, letter H's. Ideally should be about 20mm or so tall. Also looking for a few more KC chromed/silvered Metropolitan Police buttons, especially the approx. 16mm diameter pocket sized ones. If you have anything of these that you'd like to part with let me know.
  9. I recently purchased this WW2 era Police jacket on Ebay. The buttons are Cheshire Constabulary with the PoW feathers, but the epaulettes have a badge I haven't been able to identify, a shield with six rampant lions on. I believe Cheshire Constabulary should be a matching badge of the PoW feathers. Does anyone recognize who this is for please?
  10. For what it's worth, I don't believe it is an original 1880's jacket as there are a couple of stylistic features that to me would put it later. However, those could maybe at a pinch fit with say a c.1900/01 jacket or within a few years, and if stocks of buttons were being used up or an old hand held onto his older style as long as possible that could make sense. Some posters my recall my thread on the subject of the period kit below: https://gmic.co.uk/topic/54174-metropolitan-police-kit-c1880-1920-what-do-you-have-put-away/?tab=comments#comment-496219 One of the key differences between the later dress tunics which are often used to represent Ripper period jackets is the cuffs. The later dress jackets almost always have plain box cuffs, sometimes faux French/barrel cuffs. In the late 19th/early 20th century period they should have V or lancer cuffs - exactly as here. That to me is a strong piece of evidence in its favour. And I would happily buy jackets like that at £15 all day long.
×
×
  • Create New...