Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Guest Rick Research
    Posted

    Yes please! I have none. :cheers:

    • 1 month later...
    Guest Rick Research
    Posted

    This 1st Class came to visit today:

    Posted (edited)

    In between there was a visit here too :jumping:

    This one and Ricks are in my opinion the typical awarded item of the Berliner M?nze. It was minted there, but the finish was done in another firm (or for the small series produced over 20 years in the Berliner M?nze may be in different firms). That could be the reason for the difference in the enamel.

    Edited by Komtur
    Guest Rick Research
    Posted

    I'm not sure which was UP and which was DOWN on the scan I made for my friend yesterday, but I did notice that the scanner could NOT capture the pattern underneath if it was turned one way, but DID get it scanned if turned 90 degrees. I guess it is the shadows on the lines. Try turning yours sideways and see if the pattern that the scanner sees is more the way it is to look at with human eyes.

    This effect also happens with Soviet officers' shoulder boards. Straight up and down, they come out like mush. But scanned sideways, the bullion pattern shows perfectly. Weird. But it has to be the MOVING shadow effect of a scanner.

    Posted

    This 1st Class came to visit today:

    Nice to see this little beauty again, I used to own this one. Looks like it found a good home :beer:

    I used to own some of the second class medals as well and have this to add (in case no one had made a point of it yet.)

    Look at the quality difference between the 2nd class medal in Post#1 and that of Post #20.

    Post#1 clearly is a 3rd class award that had been painted silver and a very inferior enamel applied to the cross. It is almost opaque.

    Post#2 on the other hand, is made of actual silver, has a woderful transluscent enamel and a pattern on the cross similar to that seen in the 1st class award.

    I believe the difference is strictly caused by war shortages and that post#1 is a legitamate example of a late war issue medal. Post#20 being an early war example.

    With regard to the 3rd class medal, you can find them in almost every finish imaginable: Steel, zinc, brass, copper and gilded.

    Henry

    Posted

    I'm not sure which was UP and which was DOWN on the scan I made for my friend yesterday, but I did notice that the scanner could NOT capture the pattern underneath if it was turned one way, but DID get it scanned if turned 90 degrees. I guess it is the shadows on the lines. Try turning yours sideways and see if the pattern that the scanner sees is more the way it is to look at with human eyes.

    The picture of my cross is no scan it is a photo. Just by chance we had yesterday a meeting of collectors and compared three of these beauties :jumping::jumping::jumping: . No difference except caused by wearing were to be seen in the case of the cross and the crowns. But in case of the needle and the colour of the enamel one was exactly like yours and the other like the one I showed. I suppose it is the question of different finishing by two firms as mentioned above.

    Guest Rick Research
    Posted

    "Nice to see this little beauty again, I used to own this one. Looks like it found a good home "

    Must be a clone. Not that one, which was found locally years ago.

    Posted

    I am told that the enamel is important,

    laying aside the reproductions which use plastic,

    the high rounded enamel is the original issue,

    while those with low flat enamel are "later replacements"

    there was supposed to be an article about this in a German medals journal,

    • 1 month later...
    Posted (edited)

    hello all,

    thanks for sharing all this info and images!

    I am wondering if it was alone the kaiser who granted personally the 1 class decoration??I should suppose then that the other two lower classes were granted by some authority of the red cross.

    why in some ribbon bars that you have shown here the ribbons of the 2nd and 3rd clases were used together and in other's separated by another medal ribbon?

    thanks!

    Humberto

    Edited by Humberto Corado
    • 8 years later...
    Posted

    The 2nd class is a

    piece which was made after 1918 (till 1920)

    or a 57 S & L piece or a modern fake

     

    Posted

    Hi ixhs,

    "The 2nd class is a piece which was made after 1918 (till 1920) or a 57 S & L piece ..."

    I could absolutely never be a "57 S & L piece", there is nothing to combine with 57er.

    Uwe

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.