Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    My French medal collection


    Garth Thompson

    Recommended Posts

    Finally Nichan Iftikhar (Tunisia) Chevalier 1st Class and Ouissam Alaouite (Marocco) Chevalier

    Hello Garth

    Thank you for sharing !

    Your Ouissam Alaouite is not a Chevalier but an Officier. The rosette on the ribbon is missing.

    The Chevalier has no foliage around the star and is full silver.

    Like this (first type) :

    And an officer (second type) :

    Regards

    Bison

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Garth

    Thank you for sharing !

    Your Ouissam Alaouite is not a Chevalier but an Officier. The rosette on the ribbon is missing.

    The Chevalier has no foliage around the star and is full silver.

    Like this (first type) :

    And an officer (second type) :

    Regards

    Bison

    Thanks for the information, Mate.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Garth

    Your close-ups are most useful. They illustrate one of the caracteristics of the french approach to campaign (and other) medals : the Mint has an obligation to keep a supply of such awards during the probable life-time of the men (and women) who have earned them, in order to provide them with official medals at a reasonnable cost.

    This leads to occasionnal restrikes which have slight differences with the very first issues. This is particularly obvious with the early IIIrd Republic colonial campaigns : TONKIN, MADAGASCAR, DAHOMEY. The attachment to the medal itself through which the ribbon-ring is linked to it had an oblong shape (the French refer to is as the "olive" attachment). It is quite obvious on the TONKIN and second MADAGASAR medals in your collection.

    Later strickings have a round attachment, smaller than the "olive". These are perfectly official issues, simply later one, but still possibly as early as the 1930s. This can be seen on your first MADACASCAR an DAHOMEY medals. I personnally remember buying a series in the early 1960s.

    Both types are perfectly legitimate and may have been worn by soldiers and sailors who earned them.

    Keep us posted with your collecting

    Regards

    Paul

    Paul,

    A similar situatio exists with pre-WW1 US campaign medals, the ones given out for the Civil War throught the Philipine Insurrection except you can tell the differance by the numbering on the medal rim. The first strikes carry a number that reads No.xxxx, these are tracable. The second striking reads MNo.xxxx, which means mint number. The third striking was done under government contract by independant makers, these will have plain munbers with no prefix. The last official strikings were done by the US Mint in the 1950's and are of a high quality and not numbered. Most of what you see on ebay today are done by a company named GRACo and are of a very low quality.

    Garth

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Garth

    Your close-ups are most useful. They illustrate one of the caracteristics of the french approach to campaign (and other) medals : the Mint has an obligation to keep a supply of such awards during the probable life-time of the men (and women) who have earned them, in order to provide them with official medals at a reasonnable cost.

    This leads to occasionnal restrikes which have slight differences with the very first issues. This is particularly obvious with the early IIIrd Republic colonial campaigns : TONKIN, MADAGASCAR, DAHOMEY. The attachment to the medal itself through which the ribbon-ring is linked to it had an oblong shape (the French refer to is as the "olive" attachment). It is quite obvious on the TONKIN and second MADAGASAR medals in your collection.

    Later strickings have a round attachment, smaller than the "olive". These are perfectly official issues, simply later one, but still possibly as early as the 1930s. This can be seen on your first MADACASCAR an DAHOMEY medals. I personnally remember buying a series in the early 1960s.

    Both types are perfectly legitimate and may have been worn by soldiers and sailors who earned them.

    Keep us posted with your collecting

    Regards

    Paul

    Paul,

    A similar situation exists with pre-WW1 US campaign medals, the ones given out for the Civil War throught the Philipine Insurrection except you can tell the differance by the numbering on the medal rim. The first strikes carry a number that reads No.xxxx, these are tracable. The second striking reads MNo.xxxx, which means mint number. The third striking was done under government contract by independant makers, these will have plain munbers with no prefix. The last official strikings were done by the US Mint in the 1950's and are of a high quality and not numbered. Most of what you see on ebay today are done by a company named GRACo and are of a very low quality.

    Garth

    Edited by Garth Thompson
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.