Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not Police, this was a difficult one to place. I think the closest is this sub-forum, since this badge gives diplomatic immunity - anywhere in the World.

Known as the King's or, Queen's Messenger Badge, it dates back to medieval days. The Monarch used to have his own judicial court - known as the King's Bench and to execute his commands, a King's Messenger was despatched to arrest or, otherwise give instructions.

The first record of a Messenger is a man - John Norman - who was appointed in in 1485 by King Richard 3rd. - later defeated at the battle of Bosworth Field. These first messengers would have worn a tabard - or, sleeveless over tunic - which would have had the Royal Arms in bullion embroidery. To disobey them would have meant execution - they were directly giving the King's Orders.

The greyhound symbol dates back to pre1660 - when Charles 2nd. was in exile in France. He needed to send a message and the man said - 'How will they know me'? On a table in front of the King was a silver bowl, with four decorative greyhounds standing proud above the rim - this was apparently always in the presence of the King and was therefore , well known to all courtiers. The King reached forwards and broke off a greyhound as a guarantee that the message was from him. From that date the King's Messenger always wore a silver greyhound around his neck. Later a badge with the Royal Arms in enamel - with the greyhound suspended beneath was worn. This dated from the George 2nd. or, 3rd.

When the Monarch became a Constitutional one, the need for a personal Messenger diminished and they became diplomatic carriers for the most secret and important despatches. They actually travelled around the World by ship and later planes - and still do so. Their despatches are usually handcuffed to them and two 1st. Class seats are always reserved - one for him and one for the 'bag'. With modern communications they are not so important - but, they do still exist and carry out their duties. The badge is still worn around the neck on important occasions.

This rare example is for Major Sherston-Baker M.C. - who was appointed by George 6th. - so, he served in the War period. The number 51 is engraved on the back - in the silver gilt. I am not sure if the number is from early days - and therefore, a continuing one - or, if that is the number in each Reign. I suspect this last - a recent Parliamentary question on numbers showed 15 for Queen Elizabeth - but, no-one was sure.

The Medal Year Book shows values - they are completely wrong - I don't know who gives these figures, I think they guess.. A George 3rd. example - pre 1800 sold for over ?30000 ($50000) some years ago. This one - with it's accreditation , is worth at least ?2500-?3000 ($4200-4800). The one thing you can say - with certainty - is that they are rare and very collectable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mervyn.

Lovely medal - and as you mention great provenance. I dont suppose there is a limit to how many people can serve as messengers at one time? The number on the reverse is the number attributed to that specific messenger? So 51 is Major Baker?

And I agree with you about the value aspect. My medals are all alot more valuable than the figures mentioned in THAT book! :)

regards

Thomas

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sherston-Bakers were Baronets (created 1796) and while they were up to the 5th Baronet Sherston-Baker in 1935 (British edition of Who's Who?) by my 1970 Burke's Peerage they were completely and utterly EXTINCT. :speechless1:

But an earlier edition of Burke's should list where the Major fit into that family. :beer:

"Honours and Awards... 1914-1920" shows an M.C. to Captain G. W. Sherston, Reserve of Officers. No Peter-- so if that name is correct, must be a WW2 award and he was dead without sons and the line gone by 1970 wthout even a dowager widow left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is a set number - I would doubt more than one or two in the 19th. C. However, WW2 would be a different matter and I expect more would be appointed. What we don't know is how the numbering works - is it per reign - per century - or, from the early days ?

Rick, thankyou for that background - I have never actually done any research on it - it hangs on a wall in my study in Bournemouth. However, they are a Royal Appointment - now based on recommendations from the Foreign Office. The title and M.C. - probably wounded as well - would account for the King accepting him - has the 'right' background.

There are just so many rare items that used to be in regular usage - I am fortunate to have so many examples in the collection - although many have now been sold. I do wonder sometimes, if people realise just uncommon some are ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Matt - With the background, he had to have existed - as you say may have been retired. I like your little sign off - goes back to the War years and Itma - I wonder how many members today will know what it stands for ???

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks Matt - With the background, he had to have existed - as you say may have been retired. I like your little sign off - goes back to the War years and Itma - I wonder how many members today will know what it stands for ???

If referring "ttfn"... I always associate it as Tigger's way of saying goodbye in Winnie the Pooh :cat: ... you don't get to read reference books when you have young kids ;):banger:

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't remember what Tigger used to say but, Tommy Handley in ITMA - a very popular ww2 era radio show - always said TTFN as a goodbye. It stood for Ta Ta For Now, and everyone used to say goodbye in this way. Guess you have to be an historian - or, just 'old' to know that !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Blog Comments

    • Sounds great other than the Orange & Mango squash only because I prefer cran-pomegranate juice.
    • "(...) disgusting herbal concoction (...)" I took note of this description, to enrich my otherwise limited, English "Wortschatz"...
    • At work the standard indian tea such as PG tips is referred to as chimp tea. This goes back to the days when we had a Spanish girl working for us whose command of the English language was extremely limited. One lunch she said she was going to the shop could she get anything. I asked if she could get a pack of tea bags. She returned with some disgusting herbal concoction. I tried to explain what was required but without success. I then remembered PG tips had a picture of a chimpanzee on the packe
    • When I read Lapsang Souchong i decided to post something about these Tea . Many years ago I dont  know about Lapsang until I read James Michener book Centennial and the description of the savour of the Lapasang as a mix of tar and salt & smoked made me proof . It was exact ! and i liked it since then .
    • I have been known to drink Lapsang Souchong and Tea, Earl Grey, Hot... both "without pollutants". I normally have one mug of coffee in the morning, then spend the rest of the day drinking Orange & Mango squash (by the pint). Then evening comes and it's a pint, followed by red wine with dinner and sometimes a drop of Laphroaig afterwards.
×
×
  • Create New...