Jan Arne S Posted January 11, 2006 Author Share Posted January 11, 2006 Hi Pascal !Thanks !Great info about the Narvik Shield , just what I was looking for .Jan Arne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wood Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Thank you Pascal, Great info.So do all the so called Deschler type have this different pin formation, or are you going on the front details?Regards,Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pascal H Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Thank you Pascal, Great info.So do all the so called Deschler type have this different pin formation, or are you going on the front details?Regards,PeteYes, all the Deschler shields have the pin formation on the back as a cross but so does another type of shield by an unknown maker.The way to recognise these shields is to study the front details then the setup on the back will only be another detail.KRPascal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darrell Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Yes, all the Deschler shields have the pin formation on the back as a cross but so does another type of shield by an unknown maker.The way to recognise these shields is to study the front details then the setup on the back will only be another detail.KRPascalPascal, I wonder if the Demjansk Shield with this similar reverse configuration was also made by Deschler? See comparative Narvik and Demjansk shield reverses below: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pascal H Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Pascal, I wonder if the Demjansk Shield with this similar reverse configuration was also made by Deschler? See comparative Narvik and Demjansk shield reverses below:Hi Darrell,There are several types of Demjansk shields with this cross formation on the back.The Demjanks shield you posted the back of is normally found with a missing log on the right side. There is no known maker for this type.This type could have been made by Deschler but I can?t find any good reason that would explain this.KRPascal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darrell Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Thanks Pascal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now