Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can someone explain how to identify each type ? I possess 5 or 6 cross, and I'd like to know the maker !

:cheers:

In most cases it's the swords, then the body. Post the pics and I can tell you which makers you have there.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 526
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Thank you . dealer offered it to me for $375 with shipping . i may do it since I know it’s a good MVK2 ?

My group with a MVK3kr x...

Hello Chuck, The enamel looks fine on your MVO 4th with Crown and Swords by Weiss u. Co.  Each maker (Weiss, Leser, Gebruder Hemmerle, etc) had their own blue enamel shade.  Your enamel is of the

Posted Images

1) Deschler

2) Weiss & Co.

3) Deschler

PS...Deschler sometimes used to mark their crosses with 'D' on the edge of the swords. Cannot see that on the photos you posted.

Edited by avadski
Link to post
Share on other sites

My first class with sword, also by Deschler...

:cheers:

Unfortunately a fake my friend.

There are two reasons for that which are obvious at the first glance:

1) Deschler never made this class

2) Look at the poor enamel work around the belt buckle and compare it with the perfect work with your 2nd class with swords and crown.

...now you know why do I have the 'scream' in my signature in bold and red - looking for good MVK 1. class.

It's really really hard to find a good one.

Sorry for bad news :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gentlemen,

Thank for your interest and contributions. I, for one, have learned quite a lot already. To keep things moving along,

here a 3rd class cross which looks very much like the cross in posts #2 & #3...

Link to post
Share on other sites

but there is one big difference which does not come through clearly in the pictures. The body of the cross in posts #2 and #3 is made of zinc, while this one is war metal.

Keep them coming, there’s still a lot to be covered, and learned.

Edited by Wild Card
Link to post
Share on other sites

but there is one big difference which does not come through clearly in the pictures. The body of the cross in posts #2 and #3 is made of zinc, while this one is war metal.

Keep them coming, there’s still a lot to be covered, and learned.

Hello, what was the difference between zinc and war metal? I thought they were the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, what was the difference between zinc and war metal? I thought they were the same.

Since everyone is posting their MVK's - here is a pic of my 1st class

Has a mark on the sword - letter o and something I cannot make out

Any suggestion on real/fake and maker?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since everyone is posting their MVK's - here is a pic of my 1st class

Has a mark on the sword - letter o and something I cannot make out

Any suggestion on real/fake and maker?

Also here is a 2nd class that has enamel on both sides!

Any ideas on that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also here is a 2nd class that has enamel on both sides!

Any ideas on that?

Regarding your 2nd class, the cross seems to be made by Lauer who applied the enamel only on the obverse. The quality of the enamel work is also very poor so unfortunately it's an upgraded piece. There indeed existed period copies purchased for wearing which had double-enameled medallions, I think they were made by Godet (in 20's) however this does not seem to be the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding you first class the photo's not perfect. What I can see is that the cross seems to be made by Weiss & Co. Here I'm not quite sure but I think they made only early pieces (up to 1916) which have the 'L' in the center made out of pure gold and attached separately. So again I'm not very positive with this piece as well. Better photos would reveal the truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since everyone is posting their MVK's - here is a pic of my 1st class

Has a mark on the sword - letter o and something I cannot make out

Any suggestion on real/fake and maker?

Just noticed your comment about mark on your 1. class... Could that be WCo. (for Weiss&Co.)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding you first class the photo's not perfect. What I can see is that the cross seems to be made by Weiss & Co. Here I'm not quite sure but I think they made only early pieces (up to 1916) which have the 'L' in the center made out of pure gold and attached separately. So again I'm not very positive with this piece as well. Better photos would reveal the truth.

Well here is a better picture of the enamel - hope it is better - need a new camera!

I will say the l does look like gold by the patina

What kind of marks did weiss put on there crosses?

On the 2nd class enamel on both and yes kind of rough - but you think both are ok period pieces?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well here is a better picture of the enamel - hope it is better - need a new camera!

I will say the l does look like gold by the patina

What kind of marks did weiss put on there crosses?

On the 2nd class enamel on both and yes kind of rough - but you think both are ok period pieces?

well i was able to move the sword enough - very tight - to see a W then a C and then the clearly visible o so i guess that would confirm

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i was able to move the sword enough - very tight - to see a W then a C and then the clearly visible o so i guess that would confirm

This is how a Weiss up to 1916 looked like:

As I said, I'm not sure whether they made any first classes after 1916.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how a Weiss up to 1916 looked like:

http://gmic.co.uk/up...-1187082572.jpg

As I said, I'm not sure whether they made any first classes after 1916.

Well from a detail standpoint mine looks the same - the only difference is the enamel in the center is higher - as they added more of the black than in the one pictured above - so mine is closer to flat but not flat

I guess the good thing on the markings is they are not obvious - have to work to see the W and the C - sword is very very tight

Overall this is a nice feeling and looking medal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Blog Comments

    • Sounds great other than the Orange & Mango squash only because I prefer cran-pomegranate juice.
    • "(...) disgusting herbal concoction (...)" I took note of this description, to enrich my otherwise limited, English "Wortschatz"...
    • At work the standard indian tea such as PG tips is referred to as chimp tea. This goes back to the days when we had a Spanish girl working for us whose command of the English language was extremely limited. One lunch she said she was going to the shop could she get anything. I asked if she could get a pack of tea bags. She returned with some disgusting herbal concoction. I tried to explain what was required but without success. I then remembered PG tips had a picture of a chimpanzee on the packe
    • When I read Lapsang Souchong i decided to post something about these Tea . Many years ago I dont  know about Lapsang until I read James Michener book Centennial and the description of the savour of the Lapasang as a mix of tar and salt & smoked made me proof . It was exact ! and i liked it since then .
    • I have been known to drink Lapsang Souchong and Tea, Earl Grey, Hot... both "without pollutants". I normally have one mug of coffee in the morning, then spend the rest of the day drinking Orange & Mango squash (by the pint). Then evening comes and it's a pint, followed by red wine with dinner and sometimes a drop of Laphroaig afterwards.
×
×
  • Create New...