Jump to content
Bob

Shockworker Badges

Recommended Posts

Wow. :jumping: Nice! :jumping: Thanks! :cheers:

Gotta squint some at the ribbons. Those quirky spectrum shifts!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great looking set you have there Bob... Too bad I don't have the badges to go with the docs.. Well the search is on!!

The best I can do is a picture of the lady above wearing her udarnik and a ribbon bar for what looks like the order of combat valour and something I can't make out....

Seems a little unusual to me but I might be wrong.

JC

I'd say the ribbons are probably a honorary labour medal and maybe an OPS.

Though as happened before, I might be very wrong

Jan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New high for a flatback #961

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So noted, JC. Thanks.

Increasingly, I am coming to see this as no more than a curious manufacturing variation.

Flat reverse - low 16, high 961

Mirror reverse - low 180, high 5009

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_01_2007/post-679-1169327208.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_01_2007/post-679-1169325292.jpgHere pic of a huge document. Unfortunately not a number on the doc which could be used to tie it back to the badge.

Didn't fit on the scanner and I was lazy.

Now updated with interior.

Just got an identical document (as part of a larger group of documents). No reason to show it, but it may be useful to record the date of award as 30 December 1954. Maybe we're seeing a narrow window here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After some more discussion here (and in Ulanbaatar), may I offer a revised typology:

Type 1 (mirror reverse, thin silver gilt) - Low = 180; High = 5009

Type 2 (flat reverse, silvered bronze) - Low = 16; High = 961

I'd almost be tempted to see the flat-back as earlier? In the absence of number/date matches it is hard to say.

Edited by Ed_Haynes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gents,

I can not add anything to this thread other than pictures and the number, 2418, of my Shocker workes badge. I've just received the first three Mongolian badges in my collection.

Regards,

Gordon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reverse.

Nice one! These badges are really well done.

Here is one with a low number.

/Erik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Erik,

Thanks for your post. Rick now has a new low number for the mirror back awards.

Regards,

Gordon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, we do have a low number for the mirror reverse. Is Rick now recording these too?

Assume this is 148?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got an identical document (as part of a larger group of documents). No reason to show it, but it may be useful to record the date of award as 30 December 1954. Maybe we're seeing a narrow window here?

1954 seems to be a big Udarnik year indeed. Here another (partial) scan of a document I recently received (part of a larger group). Would appear that text on upper half indicates the reason for awarding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have in my collection N 16 (mirror reverse). I not can upload my file.... :banger: Sorry, look at this: http://aaaa.MoiFoto.ru/17069/f363057

Thanks Sparks - really would be great if you could post detailed pics of your big collection here on GMIC (also of documents) - I'm sure it would help us (and maybe you as well) to learn new things and/or just enoy the great items you have :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have in my collection N 16 (mirror reverse). I not can upload my file.... :banger: Sorry, look at this: http://aaaa.MoiFoto.ru/17069/f363057

Sparks,

If you are having problems uploading your pictures it may be because of the size. There is a rather small size limit for new member. Unfortunately,I can not remember what this size limit is. Perhaps someone else can assist here. There is also a place on the forum where you can practice uloading photos.

Regards,

Gordon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be glad to help resize and post pictures. (<110k)

JC

Edited by fjcp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ОК, thanks for council and helping. I will necessarily take advantage of it. As it is long necessary to be in a category "Probationary Membership"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just in - nice brown udarnik doc with pic!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now for some Shockworkers - shown in numeric order

#355

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Blog Comments

    • Brian, Thanks for initiating this discussion. For me, it’s a combination of the thrill of the chase, the history behind the item, and the aesthetics, although this latter factor may seem a bit strange to some. To illustrate this, the very first thing I collected as a kid in the 1950’s was a Belgian WW1 medal, for service in 1914-18, which is bell shaped, with a very striking profile of a very dignified soldier, wearing an Adrian helmet which bears a laurel wreath. It was the image that
    • Thank you for sharing your story, it was most interesting and greatly appreciated, it makes this blog well worth the time to post. Regards Brian  
    • Hello I started collecting when I found my first Mauser cartridges in a field next to my parents' house next to Armentières. I was eight years old.  Then shrapnel, schrapnell balls, darts... That's how I became a historian. When I was 18, we used to walk through the fields with a metal detector to find our happiness. It was my time in the army as a research-writer in a research centre that made me love the orders of chivalry. I've been collecting them for 24 years now. Christophe
    • Thank you for your most interesting comment. The thrill of the chase didn't interest me in the beginning but over time it started to overshadow the act of simply adding yet another medal or group to the collection. Regards Brian  
    • I know the way I got into collecting is like so many other people; through a sibling. I also know that my love of history is barely unique in a place like this. So I know I have a shared background with many people. A less shared area - perhaps - is that I've always loved the thrill of the chase. When I decide I want, say, a 1914 trio with an original bar, to a cavalry unit, the utter thrill of getting out there and, (a) finding groups that fit the criteria and, (b) comparing them re: ranks, uni
×
×
  • Create New...