Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Gentlemen, a post war (WW2) 1950-60's produced Pour le Merite.

A Steinhauer und Luck made piece and with their specific design features, the connected "U R", the "l" in the le Merite' not conected to the frame, the flat footless bottoms of the eagles, and the distinctive enamelled pillow look to the rear, its baroque style loop mount, but most importantly the flaw on the bottom 7 o'clock eagles wing that all St u L PLM's must have.......It measures 53mm x 53mm and weighs in at 26 gramms...it is complete with a short length of original period ribbon (1950's) and is og bronze gilt manufacture (although a a silver marked 800 was also available).

I collect post war awards/medals especially the 1957 regulation pieces, in such collecting spheres this replacement PLM is a highly sought after and prized addition, I was wondering what you Imperial chaps think ?

http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2014/post-7645-0-74171500-1393800102.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2014/post-7645-0-99114100-1393800125.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2014/post-7645-0-48059300-1393800139.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2014/post-7645-0-92580100-1393800196.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2014/post-7645-0-94001300-1393800221.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2014/post-7645-0-09079600-1393800250.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2014/post-7645-0-95535600-1393800281.jpg

Prost ! Steve.

Edited by SteveL
Link to post
Share on other sites

Arn't the prices about the same as the wartime pieces? After all, they were official issue to those who earned them back in WW1. Were there any significant design differences between the two eras?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice post-WWII S&L as you rightly suspected.

Arn't the prices about the same as the wartime pieces? After all, they were official issue to those who earned them back in WW1. Were there any significant design differences between the two eras?

A wartime gilt piece runs about $20,000 with no damage. A gold piece runs to over $32,500. An S&L postwar bronze gilt piece as this one should go for about $500. An 800-marked postwar S&L, maybe $850. So the prices are pretty different.

Edited by Streptile
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a huge price difference. As an exprienced collector of these medals, what are the biggest differences between the wartime(and earlier) and the post war pieces?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

Good question. The main differences are: quality, materials and that special mystique that attends "awarded pieces." Wartime examples are of extremely high quality, made of gold or silver with exquisite workmanship. They belonged to, or could have belonged to, someone who wore them during the war. Only two makers are thought to have made wartime award-type PLMs, and these are the most highly regarded types.

The postwar copies are also very nice, but the quality is quite poor, they were never awarded to anyone, and they were never worn in war. They are bronze gilt or silver. The overall design is substantially the same, but the actual dies are different and no one would mistake a postwar copy with the real, wartime artifact.

Overall though, I think the biggest factor contributing to the high prices of pre-1918 examples is the fact that they were awarded or worn during the war.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After all, they were official issue to those who earned them back in WW1.

After all, they weren't. There was, from what I know, not one single (military!) plm issued after the end of the monarchy in november 1918.

The later replacement crossses, all of them, were privately purchased, be it in 1925, in 1940 or in 1960.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Blog Comments

    • Sounds great other than the Orange & Mango squash only because I prefer cran-pomegranate juice.
    • "(...) disgusting herbal concoction (...)" I took note of this description, to enrich my otherwise limited, English "Wortschatz"...
    • At work the standard indian tea such as PG tips is referred to as chimp tea. This goes back to the days when we had a Spanish girl working for us whose command of the English language was extremely limited. One lunch she said she was going to the shop could she get anything. I asked if she could get a pack of tea bags. She returned with some disgusting herbal concoction. I tried to explain what was required but without success. I then remembered PG tips had a picture of a chimpanzee on the packe
    • When I read Lapsang Souchong i decided to post something about these Tea . Many years ago I dont  know about Lapsang until I read James Michener book Centennial and the description of the savour of the Lapasang as a mix of tar and salt & smoked made me proof . It was exact ! and i liked it since then .
    • I have been known to drink Lapsang Souchong and Tea, Earl Grey, Hot... both "without pollutants". I normally have one mug of coffee in the morning, then spend the rest of the day drinking Orange & Mango squash (by the pint). Then evening comes and it's a pint, followed by red wine with dinner and sometimes a drop of Laphroaig afterwards.
×
×
  • Create New...