Jump to content
Gordon Craig

Serbian Cross of Charity

Recommended Posts

Ladies and Gentlemen,

A question on the Cross of Charity.  My reference material says that this award was instituted "on  7 (19) June 1913 and was bestowed upon men and women, Serbian or Foreign, for having alleviated the suffering of the sick and wounded during and after the the conclusion of the First and Second Balkan Wars."  It then goes on to illustrate the 1912 and the 1913 dated crosses and to describe the physical differences of the two crosses.  It does not mention why there are two different Crosses of Charity.  Does anyone know why there were two different Crosses of Charity?

Regards,

Gordon

 

E9944A79-108F-48CF-BDB5-A9C3A2CE704E.thumb.jpeg.43ec82519a3ba322383b606da680fdaf.jpeg

s-l1600 (54).jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gordon

It seems there was one design awarded to men and a different design for women.....

 

03DDAABD-983F-4C2C-B23E-3FD031CFB2B8.thumb.png.02e88ce821732fdf7f4bf36ec340aa63.png

 

3A54F89B-0F33-4ED4-9BDD-D11EAD3D10E4.thumb.png.dd0007701ef715cb81cd3424c1ed76a7.png

cheers

tony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that men and women versions should be differentiated only by the suspension, classical light-blue triangular one for men, and a ribbon of the same colour for women. I am not sure about the reason for different designs, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Farcas,

Thanks for your suggestion but I agree with Drugo.  The only difference, as far as I am aware, between the award to men and women is the form of ribbon mounting.  The women were usually awarded the medal with a ribbon in a bow shape as pictured below.  But not always.  Please see the other pictures below.  The picture of the nurse awarded the Cross of Charity with the tri-fold ribbon comes from a recent ebay auction.  There are far more 1912 dated medals than there are of 1913.

Regards,

Gordon

 

s-l1600 (56).jpg

dscf1163 (1).jpg

dscf1168 (1).jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the law itself, which was passed in 1913, it was not
the stated reason why he is on the award
mentioned in 1912, and most likely
it is about the intention to be awarded
retrograde, for merits in the I Balkan
war.

The first Balkan war, which lasted from October 8, 1912 to May 30, 1913.

The second Balkan War was conducted from June 29 to July 31, 1913.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Blog Comments

    • Brian, Thanks for initiating this discussion. For me, it’s a combination of the thrill of the chase, the history behind the item, and the aesthetics, although this latter factor may seem a bit strange to some. To illustrate this, the very first thing I collected as a kid in the 1950’s was a Belgian WW1 medal, for service in 1914-18, which is bell shaped, with a very striking profile of a very dignified soldier, wearing an Adrian helmet which bears a laurel wreath. It was the image that
    • Thank you for sharing your story, it was most interesting and greatly appreciated, it makes this blog well worth the time to post. Regards Brian  
    • Hello I started collecting when I found my first Mauser cartridges in a field next to my parents' house next to Armentières. I was eight years old.  Then shrapnel, schrapnell balls, darts... That's how I became a historian. When I was 18, we used to walk through the fields with a metal detector to find our happiness. It was my time in the army as a research-writer in a research centre that made me love the orders of chivalry. I've been collecting them for 24 years now. Christophe
    • Thank you for your most interesting comment. The thrill of the chase didn't interest me in the beginning but over time it started to overshadow the act of simply adding yet another medal or group to the collection. Regards Brian  
    • I know the way I got into collecting is like so many other people; through a sibling. I also know that my love of history is barely unique in a place like this. So I know I have a shared background with many people. A less shared area - perhaps - is that I've always loved the thrill of the chase. When I decide I want, say, a 1914 trio with an original bar, to a cavalry unit, the utter thrill of getting out there and, (a) finding groups that fit the criteria and, (b) comparing them re: ranks, uni
×
×
  • Create New...