Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I've posted this picture previously but was never really happy that the medal was nailed down.

The picture is easily found on t'tinternet and has various captions associated with it. The seated gent is always seen as a veteran but it varies from Waterloo, Peninsular Wars to the Crimean and the US Civil War.

It's an Ambrotype photo on a glass plate from around 1850-60. It was found at an auction (Christie's I think) by Bruce Bernard in the 1970s who later tracked it down again for inclusion in his book "photodiscovery". The caption in this book reads "Veteran of Waterloo and his wife".

   

 

1860_Anonyme_Un_vétéran_et_sa_femme_Ambrotype.jpg

I've played with the photo a bit 

First of all I think the photo is backwards (these etched glass plates were supposed to be viewed against a dark background) as the medal should be worn on the left and now his coat buttons up correctly - it sort of looks more natural this way round.

vet 2.jpg

Then crop our hero out - he looks like he's had a pretty nasty crack on the nose at some point

vet 3.jpg

And then zoom in on the medal

vet 4.jpg

Although the bars are similar to the clasps on the Peninsular War GSM the medal itself does not. For one thing it looks to be a swinging type - the medal is not central to the ribbon - and it neither looks to be either side. What could it be?

 

Edited by Spasm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always loved this photo.  Thank you for this close up... When would this photo have been taken?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul,

This is an ambrotype photo - a positive photo on glass - (ie there's only one, like a polariod or a print on paper). They were started to be used around 1850 and were superseded by the Tintype process around 1860. Produced in that 10 year period then.

The MGSM was approved in 1847 (which had to be retrospectively applied for) and awarded for campaigns between 1793 and 1814. 

So our man in the picture above could have been 18ish in 1793 or 18ish in 1814 to give his age between 56 and 87.  I'd put him in there somewhere. 

Cheers, Steve

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi,

Spasm is correct in stating that it is a one of a kind image like a polaroid  or ferrotype (and I add: photobooth picture or daguerreotype or slide). As different as all these different types of photographic images are, what they have in common is that there is no negative to print duplicates from (so NO print on paper, so here Spasm is wrong as in this kind of process NO PRINTING is done). Through a chemical process during the development of the latent image, the negative becomes a positive through a chemical process. If you want or need copies of the image (prints), the image in question would have to be re-photographed to be reproduced. As negatives are always mirror inverted the old procedures mentioned show the image "the wrong way round", or "backwards" as Spasm puts it. And that is way. So are daguerreotypes, ferrotypes, ambrotypes, slides and the early photobooth pictures. In the later years the manufacturers of photobooths installed a prism in front of the light sensitive surface of the medium, that made the image look "right" again so that it could be used in passports etc.

GreyC

 

 

Edited by GreyC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spasm,

Thanks for your work on this picture.  It does look more normal with the medal on the left.  It will make an interesting research project looking at it this way.

Regards,

Gordon

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I've also really liked this image.  The old grizzled veteran and his wife.

I think the wife is wearing her best (looks to be a paisley patterned shawl) and is almost smiling (not common at that time as it was a serious matter to go get your photo taken).

The Paisley design first appeared around 200AD in Persia - during the 1600s the Paisley pattern started to appear on shawls imported by the East India Company. In the 1800s the weavers in the town of Paisley, Scotland became the primary producers of the pattern due to their skill in producing the design in more than two colours. 

The wife's shawl looks to be more than a two colour design - probably a very expensive item at the time.

The old man is wearing his best - albeit well worn and obviously old at that time - but still wearing a jacket with waistcoat and a chain . No doubt a timepiece in there somewhere.  The medal doesn't seem to be attached to the chain but has not just been pinned onto the overcoat - it may be pinned to the jacket/waistcoat and then folded onto the coat just before the picture was taken. No idea why the overcoat and shawl were not taken off. Maybe it was cold, or maybe the wife wanted her bonnet and shawl to be in the photo.

But I still can't pinpoint the medal. The clasps do definitely look to be a MGSM with 6 clasps. But the medal and hanging bar just isn't quite right. And I can't really see the Queen's head there - although I remember reading that at some time the medals were worn differently - ie displaying what we would now call the reverse.

So  I gave up checking all the medals I could think of and settled on the MGSM:    

Maybe one of us will find it, thanks all, Steve

medal.jpg

Edited by Spasm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...