Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Graf

Fake or Real 1941 EK1 by Deumer

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi,

I came across  of this 1941 EK1 WW2 production by Deumer

I know that the two well known Variants of this cross have open 4 on the Date 1914 This particular one has a closed 4

Graf

015b.jpg

015c.jpg

017-9.jpg

Edited by Graf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Graf,

It has been my understanding for years that these crosses that have a ridge around the edge of the clam shell back are fake.  Here is a picture of one from emdals that does not have a ridge around the edge of the clam shell back.  I am not making any comments on the authenticity of the emdals cross.  Just using it for comparison purposes.

Regards,

Gordon

 

an_iron_cross_1s_550715e357fd8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gordon,

 

Thank you for the reply

In another Thread Those four clam shell were posted

It looks the clam shell on this cross looks OK My question was about the cross itself So far I have never seen before a cross with closed arms of the number  4 all of Deumer crosses  I have seen were with open arms of the number 4 of the date

 

Graf

Ashampoo_Snap_2012.10.20_12h12m47s_001_.jpg.362a0c42dbc864999c22d3269f2085ba.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning,

Interesting picture.  Too bad someone else hasn't made a post to answer your question.  I'm not an expert on the EK 1 1914 but  I checked all of the 1914 crosses that I own and they all have an open 4.  Here is the cross that I have, with a clam shell back, that I have always considered to be a copy because of the ridge around the clam shell.  It is quite well made and of three piece construction.  But the silver on the edges of the cross has never tarnished in the 20 years that I have owned it but has started to peal off. It has an open 4.  Good luck in your search for an answer to your question.

Regards,

Gordon

 

DSC00739.JPG

DSC00741.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

could his be a 1957 version? deumer was one of two companies authorized to make replacement ww1/ww2 medals and they did so until the late 60s. just to make sure, what's the measurement of the frame? it's possible it's a nice rare earlyish post-war variant made using old stock.

that being said, i don't particularly like this part of the frame:

deumer1914.jpg.287d767380fdb7e39daf1b769cc06644.jpg

 

 

p.s also, is the core magnetic?

Edited by Eric Stahlhut

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thank you for your opinion

I agree with Eric That it could be a nice post war production using original parts I assume the maker used different core either because the original  tools were damaged or to distinguish the post war production from the earlier ones

 

I have not asked whether the core is magnetic. Just came across this EK while browsing on internet

I do not know the size , however comparing the frames the cross looks wider the any of the known early production.

Pity i had one few years ago, however I sold it as part of trimming and reshaping my collection ..and i did not keep pictures of it

 

Graf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a link to a pinback version that seems to have the same core... interesting!

i can dig it out along with a clamshell example if needed

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Blog Comments

    • Brian, Thanks for initiating this discussion. For me, it’s a combination of the thrill of the chase, the history behind the item, and the aesthetics, although this latter factor may seem a bit strange to some. To illustrate this, the very first thing I collected as a kid in the 1950’s was a Belgian WW1 medal, for service in 1914-18, which is bell shaped, with a very striking profile of a very dignified soldier, wearing an Adrian helmet which bears a laurel wreath. It was the image that
    • Thank you for sharing your story, it was most interesting and greatly appreciated, it makes this blog well worth the time to post. Regards Brian  
    • Hello I started collecting when I found my first Mauser cartridges in a field next to my parents' house next to Armentières. I was eight years old.  Then shrapnel, schrapnell balls, darts... That's how I became a historian. When I was 18, we used to walk through the fields with a metal detector to find our happiness. It was my time in the army as a research-writer in a research centre that made me love the orders of chivalry. I've been collecting them for 24 years now. Christophe
    • Thank you for your most interesting comment. The thrill of the chase didn't interest me in the beginning but over time it started to overshadow the act of simply adding yet another medal or group to the collection. Regards Brian  
    • I know the way I got into collecting is like so many other people; through a sibling. I also know that my love of history is barely unique in a place like this. So I know I have a shared background with many people. A less shared area - perhaps - is that I've always loved the thrill of the chase. When I decide I want, say, a 1914 trio with an original bar, to a cavalry unit, the utter thrill of getting out there and, (a) finding groups that fit the criteria and, (b) comparing them re: ranks, uni
×
×
  • Create New...