Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Tony

    Old Contemptible
    • Posts

      3,687
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      2

    Posts posted by Tony

    1. If the medals weren't issued/applied for originally then the next of kin can still apply for them. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/applying-for-medals

      As for naming them yourself well, if they're staying with you to remember your grandfather then engraving them would probably be better than stamping.

      Alternatively if you apply for his service record or already have it, perhaps placing his official medal entitlement with the medals will be ok.

      Personally I'd frame them with a photo of your grandfather but either way, they're yours so do whatever you feel at ease with.

       

    2. 50 minutes ago, chapster76 said:

      Just found a reference that Royal Artillery did have Corporals up until 1920? That suggests RA could still fit?

      Ok, was he from Peterborough too?

      There’s a Cpl. William Hall Royal Artillery from Peterborough who was transferred to the reserve in Dec. 1888 after 12 years service.

      His promotions are interesting with respect to ranks in the RA:

      Gnr. – 1881 to 83

      Actg. Bbr. -1883 to 83

      Bombr. – 1883 to 1885

      Corporal – 1885 to 1888

      Served India 1883 – 1888 

      His Corps and regimental number changed from 1st Bde. RA, 9089 to F/i (or F/1) 14516 but I can’t tell if this happened after his transfer to the reserve in Dec. 1888 or previous to that. And I've no idea what the meaning of F/i (F/1) is on the attached extract is or if I've gone completely off track.

      GBM_WO97_2958_156_003.jpg

    3. On 18/10/2017 at 00:34, peter monahan said:

      Absent strong evidence to the contrary, I'd say 'R.A.' is 'Royal Artillery', so that leaves the 'F/t' to puzzle out.  Perhaps 'From the R.A.'?

      Looking at a very extensive list of military abbreviations doesn't suggest anything more likely than 'Royal Artilery' and nothing at all for 'F/t'.  'Fd' is 'Field, as in artillery, and 'FT' is French Translator but neither of those is relevant so... ??? :(

      Peter, I did find reference to a Frontier Force Royal Artillery yesterday however, I've just searched William Hall born 1860 and came up with three men, none of them being above the rank of Pte.

      Chapster, do these three men named William Hall, born 1860 ring any bells? I couldn't see that any of them had the rank of Corporal.

      751 William Hall, 21st Brig. then transferred to 43 Light Infantry, born Wem, Shropshire. Married Elizabeth Keay in 1884 and stayed ‘Home’ until his discharge in 1890. He also served at Depot, Ox. & Bucks LI.

      2668 William Hall, 1/23 Fusiliers, born in Bermondsey, in the Burmah Field Force in 1888, record shows India 1880-1888, campaign Burmah.

      1797 William Hall, 34th Brig., born St. Pauls, discharged 1890 and was ‘Home’ in 1888.

      By the way, there'll be many, many men named William Hall but the above were the only ones showing up as born in 1860.

    4. All I could find with a quick search was that he was captured in CM North Africa 20/4/43 and spent time in camp 4DZ in Annaburg, his POW number was 227036 which confirms what you already know. 

      He was also in camp 98, Italy, according to wikipedia it was in San Guiseppe Jato. He was obviously in Stalag IVB, Muehlberg too so I'd have a guess at him being held in Italy, then Muehlberg before moving on to Annaburg. http://www.lager-muehlberg.org/index_e.html

      Perhaps finding where his unit was (67 Field Regt.) in April 43 might help with the actual place he was captured. I don’t know the meaning of C.M. North Africa, if it’s an area or not.

      His military record will need to be applied for. There's also a cost involved and I'm not sure but think payment can only be made by UK cheque which is a pain for anyone who isn't UK resident. A copy of his death certificate will be necessary which is an additional cost, details here https://www.gov.uk/get-copy-military-service-records/apply-for-someone-elses-records

      Forgot to say, a nice group and fantastic start to a WWII medal collection.

    5. On 04/07/2017 at 23:40, peter monahan said:

       in the extremely unlikely event that our minds went in that [low] direction, remembered the place and our roots -

      [Actually, it was my first thought too, but... ;) ]

      Luckily Chris does't speak Australian slang :)

      So, a couple of pics are below but it's not the easiest thing to photograph.

      I gave the butt a light rub with wirewool which only removed to loose stuff and the rest has been oiled rather than waxed, thanks for the tip Brian.

      Just in case anyone is wondering - the magazine is empty.

      WP_20170705_13_44_46_Pro[51253].jpg

      WP_20170705_13_45_33_Pro[51254].jpg

      WP_20170705_13_45_48_Pro[51255].jpg

      WP_20170705_13_46_20_Pro[51257].jpg

      WP_20170705_13_46_36_Pro[51258].jpg

    6. Thanks for the replies and I'm pleased to hear my thoughts of what to use were along the right lines. The metalwork is dark so has no doubt had some kind of treatment like electrolysis, which is why I was thinking about waxing the butt.

      I'll go with a light butt rub (no doubt music to Chris' ears) to remove the loose bits and then leave it, wax can be rubbed into the woodwork at a later date if necessary.

      As for the metal well, I'll probably put some beeswax on that to prevent it turning back to orange in the little nooks and crannies and will add a photo in a day or two.

    7. Has anyone had a go at preserving an old piece of wood that's been underground for a good few years?

      I was thinking of some 00 wirewool and a coating of linseed oil or maybe rubbing in some beeswax, but at the same time I don't want it losing that been in a tunnel the past 100 years look.

      Thanks for any suggestions.

      Tony

      WP_20170703_12_05_06_Pro[51208].jpg

      WP_20170703_12_06_06_Pro[51207].jpg

    8. On 11/06/2017 at 18:34, Dave Danner said:

      For the 1870 version, there were several EK1/EK2w combinations, but the 1870 EK2 was routinely awarded on the white-black ribbon to medical personnel, which was not the case with the 1914 version.

      Dave, I have an EKI 14 to a doctor and always imagined he would've received the non-com. ribbon with his EKII, thanks for putting me right with the above comment.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.