Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    John

    Admin Support
    • Posts

      727
    • Joined

    Posts posted by John

    1. I think one of the major facts was of the speed of some of these Courts Martial events. To be found guilty by a bunch of Ruperts , all of the same/similar rank , who know each other or of each other, with little or no defence, sometimes after an hour from start to finish disgusts me.
      The Army 'system' , is antiquated and totally unfair. To be charged with an offence at company or Battalion level is nothing short of a Kangeroo Court, with your liberty/and or pay easily taken away,
      Even at Colchester MCTC (military prison) the odd officer that makes it there sits in a Mess all day , where the Private is beasted all day.

      These men were found Guilty with little or no defence , usually by men who were never on the Front Line. I don't like cowards/ thieves/ murderers any more than the next man, but lets face it, how many of these convictions would be quashed if tried in todays Courts of Appeal? jumping

    2. I think the only great thing about the AK series is its simplicity,a nd the ability to keep updating it.
      If it was that great a weapon system, all the world's Special Forces would be using it, or at least a derivative of it, like the Galil or R4 etc.
      You've only got to look at the H&K MP5, which is used by everyone's SF to prove this theory.

    3. I'm glad you brought up the Finn. i'd nearly forgotten about him. I believe he had approx 400 confirmed targets destroyed and used iron sights because it was what he was used to using for shooting game etc for their pelts ( eiders mostly, i think) pre war and because most of the targets were in the woods in the snow, and under 400 yards away. He used head shots on game to stop the pelts/fur etc being destroyed.
      He was seriously wounded by Artillery, and never went operational again.

      As for the Russians, they had masses of manpower, and I have never really classed them as snipers, mostly marksmen , which is true even today. Each Motor Rifle platoon has a 'marksman' armed with a Dragunov SVD, in the Platoon HQ. He has little extra training, and is there because he is the best shot.

      Anyway, the SVD is still the only sniper rifle to date which has a bayonet lug fitted! Why?

      There were several high profile women snipers in Russia but may have been a PR coup. The Russians certainly led the way in the Semi Automatic field with the Tokarev rifle, which the Germans copied badly.

      I have fired several of the WWII Rifles and I must admit there was little difference between them all, except for the quality of some of the sights.
      I did enjoy it though :food-smiley-004:
      Interesting about the Hythe chap, but then in his defence, he may have had the language barrier and have a fairly low standard of training, coupled with the fact his soviet rifle may have been the only weapon he had ever used. If you know any more of this , I would be interested.

    4. you may have problems researching items from this area. I had a very nice RSPCA medal for bravery in silver to a PS in one of the earlier Kent police forces prior to it all becoming Kent Constabulary.
      Unfortunately, most records for these smaller 'out posts' etc were pulped due to the needs of WWII.
      This particularly included SC records. The 'Kent Messenger' were very helpful though, and you can Email them, and they are surprisingly helpful. wub.gif

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.