
Thomas W
For Deletion-
Posts
788 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by Thomas W
-
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
I think I've solved the mystery. Here's another card, from the 9th Company, 9th Battalion, Infanterie-Ersatz-Truppe, Beverloo. I think the original card shows men from the 6th Company, 6th Battalion, 5th Detachment, Infanterie-Ersatz-Truppe Beverloo, being trained by the Maschinen Gewehr Ausbildungs Kommando Beverloo, in the use of the lMG08/15. -
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
Post #5 appears to show that the card was sent from Beverloo. So, the question remains: How big was a Maschinen Gewehr Ausbildungs Kommando? Was it at least six battalions, or does that small sign in post #1 refer to the infantry regiment being trained in the use of the lMG08/15? -
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
Thanks, Jens. Here's information on a Danish-German soldier who served in the 3rd Company, Maschinen Gewehr Ausbildungs Kommando, Beverloo. http://slesvigske.dk...hristiansen.htm -
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
It looks to me like "Musketier Otto ________, 6 Bataillon, 6 Kompanie, 5 Abteilung, Infanterie Ersatz Regiment 146." It makes sense that it's an infantry regiment. Musketier is an infantry private, and the lMG08/15 was assigned to infantry companies, six per company. The MG08 heavy machine gun was assigned to machine-gun battalions; a machine-gun battalion private was called a Schütze. The small sign on the front of the card--in the first post--is totally confusing. -
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
-
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
-
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
-
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
-
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
-
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
-
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
-
What's "MGAK"?
Thomas W replied to Thomas W's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
Thanks. I looked up your suggestion and also came up with Maschinengewehr Ausbildungs Kommando, which were machine-gun schools. -
True, but this one looks like a one-piece white-metal badge. It seems to be casting a shadow. Also, it's very bright in comparison to the other officers' badges I've seen. Somewhere in this massive thread are shots of officers wearing the bullion badge, which photographs as a light gray. Maybe this guy went out and had himself a metal badge cast privately. It's a wartime photo, not a postwar image.
-
But the quote still says nothing about official versus unofficial. If the Crown Prince told Rohr's men they could wear his monogram, the argument could be made that the badge was "awarded." However, one badge was approved by the Kaiser, and one wasn't. The Rohr badge has no official approval from any authority, does it?