RICK SCHMID

Hi Mark

In viewing yours I think Its a Steinhauer #4. Although the date and swaz's look close the marking method doesn't I've posted pics of my 3 # 65 marks for your view. Hope this helps.

catch

rear

Hi Guys:

Nice silver RSS. opinions appreciated

mm

rear

Hi Guys:

Hope you like, opinions appreciated

MM

rear

Hi Guys.

Here is one not listed in the past IAB thread. Scarce item hard to find. hope you like. Opinions always appreciated.

Hi David:

Nice cross's those 55's mostly all have flaws on the beading from what I've seen. On the 65 out to lunch on the maker mark. I'm not familer with this font. Need more opinions from others.

[attachmentid=59986]Hi Steve:

Nice collection as the others say be careful these Ek2's are very addictive. You've seen mine and it grows daily, when you know where the Iron Cross's Grow "Steiner"

Regards

Rick Schmid

Maker Mark

Hi Guys

Very nice cross, the first I've seen with L/54 mark. An intresting piece having the hump frame for the ribbon ring. Does anyone have info on this manufacturer. Did they only produce EK 2's for the afermarket?

Any info greatly appreciated

Maker Mark

Hi all.

Very nice cross the first I've seen. This an intresting maker with a hump frame for the ribbon ring. Was this manufacturer only licenced for aftermarket sales, any infor on this greatly appreciated.

Thanks Rick Schmid

[attachmentid=58355]2

I would say the cross is a W&L just because it looks exactly the same as a 100 marked cross,the thing with Juncker EKII's is that I have never seen one marked that I am 100% sure on.

If it were mine I would probably label it a W&L.

Just my tuppence worth.

Dave

Hi Dave I think the key to solving this riddle lies solely in the beading corners directly facing the swaz. Look at the unique cross hatching design totally different than the MM 100. I have seen 4 others with this design all marked L/12 with different mounts. You decide.

maker mark. . .

[attachmentid=58114]

Thanks Bill

[attachmentid=57822]

[attachmentid=57821]

My un-marked Deschler

[attachmentid=57821]

[attachmentid=57820]

Hi David

The answer is yes, This the only maker that I have seen where the ring actually goes through the top of the frame. See new pics of the 3 Deschlers I have. Hope you like and coments are appreciated.

[attachmentid=57820]

Hello

Looks like a nice EK from the photos. Does the ring really go through a hole on the top arm, as it appears from the pictures and is this a common feature of Deschler EK2s?

Hi David

The answer is yes, This the only maker that I have seen where the ring actually goes through the top of the frame. See new pics of the 3 Deschlers I have. Hope you like and coments are appreciated.

[attachmentid=57819]

Hello

I have just received this EK2 which is maker marked '52', for Gottlieb & Wagner, Idar-Oberstein. However, I can't find any other '52' EK2s to compare it against. Does anyone have one of these, or can anyone say if this one is ok or not? The cross is of three piece construction and has a magnetic core.

Any help or comments will be really appreciated.

While I'm posting, I have been going through some stuff I have had for a bit, and I'm happy with everything except with this EK2, pictures of which I'm posting after the shots of the '52' marked piece. I know what I think it is, (Floch), but do others agree? Please advise.

Many thanks in advance.

[attachmentid=57818]

[attachmentid=57817]

Hi David

Here is my pics of the #52 hope they help. IMO yours looks good, however It looks like the fonts on the mm are a little different from mine. It might be my pics so I will get a tighter shot on it later and post it.

[attachmentid=57817]

Hello

I have just received this EK2 which is maker marked '52', for Gottlieb & Wagner, Idar-Oberstein. However, I can't find any other '52' EK2s to compare it against. Does anyone have one of these, or can anyone say if this one is ok or not? The cross is of three piece construction and has a magnetic core.

Any help or comments will be really appreciated.

While I'm posting, I have been going through some stuff I have had for a bit, and I'm happy with everything except with this EK2, pictures of which I'm posting after the shots of the '52' marked piece. I know what I think it is, (Floch), but do others agree? Please advise.

Many thanks in advance.

Hi David

Here is my pics of the #52 hope they help. IMO yours looks good, however It looks like the fonts on the mm are a little different from mine. It might be my pics so I will get a tighter shot on it later and post it.