Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    NavyFCO

    Active Contributor
    • Posts

      1,625
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    Posts posted by NavyFCO

    1. Ukaz: A decree from the Presidum of the Supreme Soviet

      Prikaz: A decree (or order) from any unit below the Presidum (to include Fronts, Armies, Corps, Division, Regiments, etc....)

      Ukazes were used for long service awards, as well as most awards given post-WW2.

      Prikazes were normally used for non-long-service awards during WW2, and rarely before or after.

      In my book, I simply listed them all as "Order" for both (as they can translate out as that) such as "Order of the Red Banner awarded by Order of the 1st Belorussian Front No. 023/N dated 24 April 1945" and "Order of the Red Banner awarded by Order of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet dated 11 November 1944".

      Hope that helps!

      Dave

    2. One of Ike's uniforms. That's about as good as it gets in my book.

      A Marshall, Bradley or Patton uniform would be nice if I couldn't have my first choice though. :P

      Luckily, I have a personal hero that fought in WW2 and earned the Navy Cross. I never met him but I have met his family. I currently own all of his uniforms. So, of the ones that I could realistically own, I own them already (now if I could just get the medals from the family....nah...) :love:

      On a personal note, I would really love to have my great uncle's AAF Colonel's uniforms, but he tossed everything when he retired as a general in the USAF in the 60s. :angry:

      If one could only dream.....

      Dave

    3. Research said she only got those 2 medals.

      It is not unusual at all to see some medals missing on the award card. The primary emphasis of the award card was to document the numbered awards the person received. Depending on when the person received their other awards, their award card may have already been written and stored in the archives before they received their medals. Considering that she was discharged in mid-1945, it may have taken years before her medals got to her.

      Can you post up the research?

      Dave

    4. This stuff is out of price for the big majority of Soviet collectors on this forum. So I think it doesn't affect us so much. ;)

      I'm not sweating the results of this auction too much as I don't think that the buyers of these awards are the same ones that are the buyers of the things that most of us can afford. The collectors of republican awards often don't cross into the "common" Soviet awards, and even rarer are the collectors of Imperial awards that cross into Soviet awards.

      The results of this auction though shouldn't surprise anyone though. All of these awards are very rare and sought after, and I wouldn't be surprised if the new owner of the St Andrew is one of the new Russian billionaires (I know of at least one that is a serious collector of militaria) to whom money really isn't that much of a problem.

      Luckily for us, this sort of person would be flooded if they ever started buying the groups that we can afford! Thus, I don't think this will do anything to change the overall prices of Soviet awards. Now, had the pulled awards been auctioned off, we might have seen a few records hit for prices with the same Russian billionaire(s) playing in the bidding pool, but to be honest I really doubt that they would have garnered much more than we see them for sale at the moment, unless someone got bit by the "auction bug" and just wanted to do everything possible to outbid the other buyer.

      Just my opinion....

      Dave

    5. Is there any information on the reverse (other than the notes of the archivist) regarding the For Valor medal being upgraded to the Glory?

      A feeling I have about this is that he might have initially been awarded a For Valor medal, but was upgraded later. Could be that he never recieved his For Valor medal and it was upgraded, or he received it and it was later exchanged (or perhaps it could have been lost when he was wounded or invalided out...) There's an odd gap between the 27 December 1943 prikaz from the unit and the fact that the award wasn't given to him until nearly ten years later, so there might be some good theories out there.

      Incidentally, on late "catch up" award cards (like this one) I have rarely ever seen them with the campaign awards. Normally, they just have the person's medal. Sometimes, they might include any/all others medals they received, or it might be an entirely separate award card.

      Dave

    6. I have a friend whose father is in the Russian Army at present, and who is able, hopefully, to ascertain to whom these Orders were awarded. I shall advise of results, if any. . .

      Not to be a wet blanket, but just so you don't get your hopes up too high.... I'm fairly certain that they won't be able to get the names. If they can, I'll be very impressed. I had a contact who had access physically in the archives (got some great pics inside the archives!) :P who couldn't do it. The fellow we all use for research can do it, but even he isn't fully certain of how they get the information to him.

      Dave

    7. Well, I've heard of raising prices, but if 1985 OGPWs start selling for $122 a piece, I'm done with Soviet collecting - I couldn't afford it anymore!

      Seriously, I think some sellers know that the prices have gone up, so they're taking a chance to see what price they can maximize from their awards. The OGPW is way overpriced, and the Red Star is overpriced for this serial number range. However, if the Red Star was of a range I needed for my research, I MIGHT be tempted to buy it at this price (though I'm not saying it's worth it!)

      Dave

    8. I don't have a dog in this fight as I don't own one of these (nor have any intention to do so) but I would still have my doubts about this medal for several reasons (and this was well before Igor posted up his original for comparison.) Compare this one to Igor's. Note that Igor's is silver with a nice patina. The one in the auction doesn't even appear to be silver, let alone with a patina. It looks more like a dark grey metal of some sort. Second, the one in the auction has the numbers cast into the piece from when the faker made a cast of the original medal. Once again, compare that to Igor's, and you'll see that the numbers aren't cast into the arms, but are instead cleanly stamped. Finally, look at the detail on the George and on the reverse. It's not near what it should be, even with many years of wear. There are a few other things, but those were the biggest keys to me.

      Dave

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.