Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Tim B

    Past Contributor
    • Posts

      2,234
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      2

    Posts posted by Tim B

    1. I don't collect Red Cross medals normally but, I came across this one recently and thought it was a standard "Member's" medal from the 1904-05 Russian Campaign period. Even had the Meiji style bow ribbon for what I thought was the lapel device.

      Once it arrived however, I noticed two things that puzzled me on it.

      First, the bow is attached to the suspension ribbon. Actually sewn on and appears in the same original color thread. My first thoughts were, was this done just to keep the two pieces together until the member could get a pin for the bow? If so, was this practice normal?

      The second thing that I thought odd, was the medal "coin" is made out of aluminum, not silver or other metal. I thought that aluminum medals were made during the 1930's and then I started to ask exactly what am I looking at? Unfortunately, there just isn't very much good thorough information out there on these Red Cross medals, or at least I haven't found any.

      Any help here?

      Tim

    2. Wow! I can't believe this thread is over two years old without any additions but, I need some help here. I did something I don't like to do very often and that's buy something I don't know much about. :rolleyes:

      Albanian Partisan Star, First Class. Looks correct compared to the pictures I can find of them; has the parenthesis around the top star tip and the dimples on the reverse. Do the dimples look correct? Looks great and I can't wait to get it in hand.

      Did I do good? :unsure:

      Appreciate any comments!

      Tim

    3. I remember when we got the Saudi medals for Gulf 1, guys in the regiment were insisting that the middle part was in solid gold...

      Hope always stays strong... ;-)

      :cheers: Yea, I remember hearing that BS too! Had all the guys anxiously awaiting their medals to arrive and when they finally showed up, the rumor was only the first initial ones that went to high-ranking individuals, then the rumors they got swapped; it never ends... :unsure: I'll say this; if any of them were with solid gold centers, the actual gold amount would be so small, it wouldn't be worth squat anyway.

      Tim

    4. Thomas,

      Not sure of the center (Zaire) piece; something I just don't have knowledge on. The other two look okay; the 14-18 CdG has it's palm upside down, but I have seen a few like this, so..? The ribbon may have been replaced, I don't know. Search these threads for more info.

      The one on the right is actually a Belgian CdG which also looks okay to me.

      Tim

    5. Thomas,

      Imo, and I am not the authority here on Belgian awards, all three appear original and the Leopold II and Crown Orders appear to be WWI related. I suppose the Leo II (unilingual) could be WWII. Keep in mind that they are in essence, long service awards and may have been awarded years later. The crossed swords indicate a WWI veteran and the Albert palm indicates war service related (mentioned in dispatches).

      I don't know enough on the third one to make an informed comment and will leave that one to someone else. Look nice!

      Tim

    6. Hi Dieter,

      Well, considering we see so many near pristine Japanese awards and documents for sale all the time is a testament that some things did in fact survive the war and in decent shape. I know when I was stationed in Yokosuka back in the 1990's, I would talk to communication types that worked up "on the hill" that said all kinds of stuff WWII related was still being found in various underground tunnels in and around the area. I know they were doing a lot of underground construction at the time I ws getting short, so who knows how many of these underground facilities there were spread throughout the country?

      Has to be something, maybe nothing more than a booklet or a notice sent from the mint to one of the distributors with a list of names and authorized marks similar to what the Germans did with LDO numbers. You would think anyway.

      Tim

    7. There always has to be "something" left; it couldn't have all been destroyed. Records would have been duplicated to some point and some records probably exist somewhere. The problem is (only my opinion and don't mean sh1t), this is virtually a non-priority for anyone in government that might have access to records and then, where do you start?

      Who cares about something that is half a centrury old already and of a time that most current population could honestly care less about or want to forget. One day, some old guy cleaning out some storage shelf in some old government building will come across some old archive documents and by chance someone else that collects, or knows someone who does, will "discover" the ultimate source of information. Until then, unless someone with a buddy that could authorize access and have a lot of time on their hands to really DIG for this information, it will not happen.

      Again, only expressing my view. Government is government, doesn't matter what country we're talking about.

      Tim

    8. Yes, but I guess it comes down really to what "you're" into. For me, it varies, but the majority of coins I like to collect these days are Morgan silver dollars. They have great eye appeal, are relatively old, quite a large coin (bigger is better! :speechless1: ) and they have a lot of variety within the series. SOME are still relatively cheap, though some are not by any means.

      The common coins today just don't make it for me, though I did collect the full set of state quarters and still get the annual Walking Liberty Dollar. Overall though, the quality in design is just not what it used to be; same can be said on military awards honestly.

      Of course, these are nice... :rolleyes:

    9. While I have you hostage here... :rolleyes:

      I had always considered my Red Military Merit Cross of Spanish Civil War era (I know it's Franco period), just of different manufacture compared to the typical ones with the MM on the reverse. However, after comparing the crown styles on both of these, I wonder if it is a bit later, perhaps WWII.

      Tim

      NOTE: These may not be correctly sized to one another as I cut & pasted the two separate photos.

    10. Dolfek,

      Many thanks for the correction; the seller was calling it a Spanish Cross of War and I understood it to be the lower ranks version of the War Cross; just forgot the WAR part in my typing the title. :speechless:

      The seller was under the impression that some German soldiers might have been awarded this, but I don't see how that was possible. I know there were Blue Division Spainards that received the EK during their service on the Eastern Front, but even for Germans that were serving alongside, would they have been awarded this? I didn't think so but, not 100% sure here.

      Thanks again!

      Tim

      Here's some more PICS:

      The crown is actually separate and riveted on.

    11. Sorry: Mis-named the title which should read...

      1942 Spanish War Cross for Enlisted

      I am waiting on this one in the mail, but it looks to be a beauty! :love:

      Two quick questions:

      1) Was this awarded to Spanish personnel only, and only during WWII (I/E: Spanish Blue Division)?

      2) I think this rates above the Red Military Merit Cross in order of precedence, correct?

      Okay, technically 3 questions. :rolleyes:

      Thanks!

      Tim

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.