Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    IrishGunner

    Old Contemptible
    • Posts

      5,629
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    Posts posted by IrishGunner

    1. It's been mentioned in other topics that next year will be the 100th anniversary of the start of the Great War or World War I. Of course, 100 years ago this month, Europe was witnessing the middle of the First Balkan War, which also had Serbia at the core of it's ignition. The Great War or World War I provides the backdrop to many (dare I say most) of our discussions of medals, photographs, weapons, and militaria here on GMIC. The Great War is a the source and foundation for many of our common collecting interests. Therefore, I propose a discussion of the events over the next 19 months - leading up to August 2014, the 100th Anniversary of the outbreak of the Great War - on or close to their anniversary dates. Questions could be... At what point was war inevitable? At what point could war have been averted? What are the interesting pre-war side events or anecdotes that set-up later something more interesting during the war itself (the development of a weapon, the promotion/assignment of a particular officer) - we all have these interesting little tid-bits in our reseach.

      To start, it is my supposition that the Great Powers were already inclined to fight a war in 1912-13 and had they felt more ready for war at the outbreak of the Balkan Wars 1912-13, World War I would have started in 1912 instead of 1914.

      On 18 October 1912, Peter I of Serbia declared to his Kingdom that the Turkish government showed no interest in the rights of its citizens in the Balkans and that the situation had become unbearable. He called upon Bulgaria, Greece, and Montegnero to join him in the Balkan League to oust Turkey from the penninsula. There was no doubt as to rising Serb nationalism and as to Belgrade's willingness to go to war to satisify Serb aspirations. This was already a great concern to Austria-Hungary. The Ottoman Empire long had been in decline and the question of what to do with the "Dying Man of Europe" was a frequent question. Russia encouraged the Balkan League and saw it as a way of extending Moscow's influence in the region - even at the cost of Austria-Hungary. But unlike more than 50 years prior when Britain and France fought the Crimean War to limit Russian influence in the decaying Ottoman Empire, none of the Great Powers, Britain included, seemed to really care this time about tossing the Turks out of Europe. There were half-hearted diplomatic attempts by the Great Powers to prevent action by the Balkan League; mainly because France wasn't feeling ready for war in 1912 and couldn't get a clear statement of support from Great Britain in case of war.

      But perhaps the most important event that prevented the Great War from starting in 1912-13, was the non-result of the German Imperial War Coucil of 8 December 1912. Both Wilhelm II and Army Chief of Staff von Moltke agreed that if a war were necessary, the sooner the better. However, according to the Navy Chief, Admiral von Tirpitz, the Imperial Navy wouldn't be ready for war until mid-1914. Wilhelm II ultimately sides with von Tirpitz and there is no decision for war in 1912. Interestingly, as a result of this meeting, Berlin informs Austria-Hungary in a message that Germany will not be ready for war until the summer of 1914 - a foreshadow of councils to come. Austria-Hungary stays out of the Balkan Wars 1912-13 - for the time being.

      A side note, Field Marshall Alfred Graf von Schlieffen - architect of the Schlieffen Plan, Germany's blueprint for the launching the Great War - died 100 years ago yesterday on 4 January 1913. Against the backdrop of the Balkan Wars, one can only imagine the side-bar discussions among German officers at von Schlieffen's funeral at the Invalidenfriedhof in Berlin. (I imagine there was no commemoration in Berlin this week?) Von Schlieffen's alleged dying words: "Remember: keep the right wing very strong."

    2. I thought that the Philippines was a US territory during that time, thus should receive(in my logic) the US version of that medal. I am very suprised to see this.

      Ahhh, logic... :whistle:

      Indeed, the Philippines were an "unincorporated" territory - meaning they were merely a possession and not considered an integral part of the United States (and therefore under the jurisdiction of the Consitution). So, in that logic - they weren't the US at all and should have their own medal. Actually, the Philippine Autonomy Act was passed in 1916, which basically indicated the US intent to allow the Philippines to become independent at some point. So, in that logic...

      Ahhh, logic... :speechless:

    3. I'm not convinced this must be the Bulgarian... might it not be some medal of a chamber of industry and commerce, or something similar?

      Of course, we can't conclusively rule out "some medal of a chamber of industry and commerce, or something similar," but do you have any examples? There are, indeed, precedents for ribbons of Bavarian medals in this non-military direction to be something other than the usual Bayern blau/weiss - for example the 1910 Agricultural Jubilee Medal...

      2-786-1.jpg

      Obviously, this isn't the medal on the bar - I provide it only as an example that Bavaria used other color ribbons - including green/red. But I can't find any Bavarian medal with the subject ribbon. Given the white, green red of our subject ribbon - the usual suspects would be Bulgarian, Hungary, or Italy. Of those, the closest is the Bulgarian Civil Merit and it seems to make sense on this bar - considering the lack of a MVK and the presence of the fireman's medal. In my neophyte opinion, of course. Nonetheless, there is still room for doubt ad you are correct - the word "must" is too strong. But the Bulgarian Civil Merit is the "most" likely suspect presented so far...

    4. I agree with Uwe that it's the Bulgarian Order for Civil Merit... Variation in what appears to be proportions could simply be manufactuer's variation.

      It comes in six (6) classes and one of the lower classes would make sense for this bar...

      Bg1ocm.gif

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders,_decorations,_and_medals_of_Bulgaria

      Here's a 4. Class that sold on bulgariamedals:

      bigthumb_79dcb6df_bgcivmer4cboris3.jpg

    5. Because of the fireman's medal, I thought it was similar to the Austria Hungary PRO DEO ET PATRIA Veteran's Medal non-combatant ribbon.... But not that one either because the green and red are separated by white.

      We just had a discussion of this medal: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php/topic/56668-curious-medal-bar-and-a-question/

      hungary_03.jpghungary_04.jpg

    6. Chris is correct. Kudos to you!

      The Hungarian dingus has no swords. It's the only one I've ever seen. it was a sort of "why bother" thing, but this recipient must have been proud of the splinter he picked out of some Austro-Hungarian nun's finger... especially to go to the trouble of having it mounted.

      So, out of curiosity then... Have you seen the medal w/swords mounted on a non-combatant ribbon? Or would that simply be "fantasy"?

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.