Beau Newman

Unusual to see the Wurtt. Cross between the 2 Baden awards.  There's probably a good story there.  Definitely a senior NCO.

A Turkish officer absolutely could be awarded a Prussian order.  For example, Enver Pasha received the Pour le Merite in 1915 for his part in the Gallipoli campaign.  As i understand it, the Red Eagle Order was the usual peacetime award to foreigners.  Early on, there was a special version for non-Christians but, it was short lived and the standard version was awarded in most cases.

Just arrived - Wurttemberg Medal for 3 Campaigns.

I haven't seen enough Jerusalem crosses to have an opinion on that but, the Anhalt piece appears to be silver-gilt, which is a bit of a red flag for me.  These are generally bronze-gilt like the Albert the Bear awards.

They are the merit medals of the Anhalt Order of Albert the Bear and The Saxe-Ernestine Order for Altenburg (Type of 1871-1891).  Nice to find them in the cases. 

The Princely Hohenzollern grades were a bit different than the usual setup.  The pinback cross, usually an Officer's Cross in many orders, is actually the 1st Class for this Order.  It grades below the Grand Cross but above the Commander's Cross.  It was awarded 561 times from 1852 to 1965.

Just a comment - The 1870 bar combination is a bit unusual as the large units that were at Orleans were not at Weissenburg.  It could be a staff officer or someone in a position that called for him to move around between units but, it is a bit of a red flag.

Here is the silver Thaler.  It was issued in fairly large numbers but, did not seem to see much actual circulation as most examples are in nice condition.  Many made it into jewelry.

Both a commemorative Thaler (KM 488) in silver and a medal on ribbon (OEK 1855) in gilt bronze were issued in 1861.  The obverses were the same basic design.

FWIW, my understanding is that the only wartime jeweler for these was Bernard Knauer. They used the mark "B. KNAUER" up to the early '20's, usually on the underside of the pin. The mark was changed to simply "KNAUER" sometime in the early '20's. Although marks can easily be reproduced, I understand that pieces marked only "KNAUER" without the "B" are, at best, 1920's or 1930's replacements.

The Saxon Long Service Medal was for enlisted personnel only, if I'm not mistaken. So, this guy was probably a old time NCO that received a field commission during the war.

Raising this old topic, I recently got this pair as part of a larger lot. I thought I would get your opinions. They are the Frankfurt Medal for 1814 (est. in 1846) and the Frankfurt Medal for 1815 (est. in 1816). Both are beautifully struck and are the correct weight. Any opinions would be appreciated as I haven't seen enough of these to develop a good feel yet.

The Baden medal was probably awarded for service in China so, the period is correct.

He gives a recipient list that shows, by my count, 16 Silver and 5 gold between 1914 and 1918.

Wow! - That was a lot of work - much appreciated. I will keep my eye out for a 3rd Class Order w/o swords.

Thanks again.

A few years back, I picked up the mounted Pre-1905 Bavarian MVO Knight paired with a Stanislas ribbon. I would eventually like to complete the pair but, I have a question. I assume that this was probably a Bavarian military officer serving in some kind of diplomatic capacity in the 1880-1900 time frame. On the Stanislas, did swords indicate a wartime award or simply that the recipient was in the military? In the case of a foreign recipient, under what circumstances would swords be appropriate?

Any feedback would be appreciated.

There's not much out there that's not in German. If you can locate the 4 volume Nimmergut set (very expensive however) each grade is pictured.

No wear on the ribbons, even at the ends of the bar and a mix of campaign bar styles make it look to be a recently put together group to me.

The book by Peter Ohm-Hieronymussen shows the numbers for Strelitz as 56 for the Gold Cross and 71 for the Silver Cross for all years between 1864 and 1918.

Lugvigsen's book only gives the 1914 to 1918 numbers for Schwerin as 23 Gold and 21 Silver with no breakdown by grade for the 50 years prior. However, I think that it is safe to assume that the total for all years would be in the hundreds for Schwerin.

Grungy and tattered - But I still like it.

I've noticed this guy a several times. Junk medals on incorrect ribbons.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/rare-memory-medal-sucessful-royal-troops-CHINA-1900-1901-ribbon-/191203594484

An invaluable reference. Not all-inclusive but, excellent information on those awards it does cover.

2 and 3 could be Anhalt I suppose but, why 2 of them? No long service with the Centennial is possible but, unusual. The precedence is off for a 1930's bar with the EK in 2nd place. The construction looks pretty good but, there are some red flags for me on this one.

My understanding is that these were post war awards and were unofficial. There was no officially awarded pin-back version of the SCG War Service Decoration. Nimmergut gives dates of 1922 for the flat version with the shield on the back and 1927 for the vaulted version with no shield on the back. I would have to assume that this falls under the category of a Veteran's or possibly Freikorps badge. I haven't seen anything on the numbers awarded.

I don't like the way the Hindenburg cross is mounted, looks like it was tipped in at a later date.

That's not all that unusual. Originally, he might have had an earlier style veteran's award in that spot. These were officially outlawed when the Hindenburg was awarded. He might have simply pulled the old one out and had the Hindenburg inserted without getting a new bar assembled.