Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    avadski

    Active Contributor
    • Posts

      655
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    Posts posted by avadski

    1. Regarding you first class the photo's not perfect. What I can see is that the cross seems to be made by Weiss & Co. Here I'm not quite sure but I think they made only early pieces (up to 1916) which have the 'L' in the center made out of pure gold and attached separately. So again I'm not very positive with this piece as well. Better photos would reveal the truth.

    2. Also here is a 2nd class that has enamel on both sides!

      Any ideas on that?

      Regarding your 2nd class, the cross seems to be made by Lauer who applied the enamel only on the obverse. The quality of the enamel work is also very poor so unfortunately it's an upgraded piece. There indeed existed period copies purchased for wearing which had double-enameled medallions, I think they were made by Godet (in 20's) however this does not seem to be the case.

    3. Hi folks,

      I'm not collecting the medal bars at all but there's a chance for me to obtain a very fine looking one so that I have at least something in my collection. Thing is I don't know whether the combination of awards on that medal bar was possible so I hope my question would not be that stupid for a newbie:

      Was it possible to have centenaire medal and WH LS award on one bar? How old the guy would have been in WW2? 70-80 years?

      Thank you.

    4. My first class with sword, also by Deschler...

      :cheers:

      Unfortunately a fake my friend.

      There are two reasons for that which are obvious at the first glance:

      1) Deschler never made this class

      2) Look at the poor enamel work around the belt buckle and compare it with the perfect work with your 2nd class with swords and crown.

      ...now you know why do I have the 'scream' in my signature in bold and red - looking for good MVK 1. class.

      It's really really hard to find a good one.

      Sorry for bad news :(

    5. I have had a handfull originals over the years, yours is a fake, sorry. All awarded items have a much better quality plus they are made of pickled iron, no exception.

      Perfect, thank you very much. So the cross goes back to the dealer. My concerns about michelju's decreasing reputation are then confirmed. I have to repeat myself saying that it's a pity to see good sellers turning into 'sammlerclubs'.

    6. Meister,

      thanks for your reply. Regarding the dealer it's vice versa - he sells good items but sometimes a bad one. I got it from Michel Juergen (michelju on eBay). :ninja:

      I heard a lot of good and few bad about him, unfortunately it seems that I will be in the group which says the bad :(

      BTW didn't you find my comparison with the WikiPedia cross interesting? Strange that both crosses have same flaws.

      ...one more thing..my cross appears to be a zinker, definitely not bronze or iron. But as I mentioned already, only source of info that I have is Wikipedia and the data in there does not necessarily be 100% true.

    7. Hello,

      I have an opportunity to buy this cross. Body itself along with medallion looks good, only concern that I have is the upper part where the swords once used to be (I believe). Another bad spot is where the ring is attached to the body which is obviously a repair. My intention is to go to jeweler with swords made by Leser and ask him to gilt them. Then I would attach them to the body using the original device. Whole process (along with the cross as shown below) would cost not more than 250 EUR. If you were me would you do that? I think it's worth...

      Thanks for your opinions.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.