Alex Bolotnikov

Alex are you concerned about the flaw or just curious? It's a texbook RK no worries there.

Darrell, I have no doubts about originality of the cross itself, just was curious about the die flaw

So many views and only few replies :(

Nice Pictures !!!

I see a similar flaw on a Juncker in Dietrich's book p.62. Although it's not in the same light as yours, you can see a couple close together like yours. I can't say whether this is on "all" Junckers, Dietrich doesn't show many pictures of that exact spot.

Nice camera

Yes I also found this flaw in the book but just want to get additional confirmation from the KC owners :)

To me it looks like there are 2 more die flaws one between the 00 in 800 (runs vertically) and the other between the /1 (also running vertically). What do you think?

Cheers

Chris

Chris,

That should be my next question I was searching thru GMIC and WAF archives but couldn't find some firm proof. Some of the crosses have these flaws some not. But maybe it's because of the low quality photos. Once again I'm talking only about 800-L/12 and Lazy 2 crosses.

Closeups:

Here are they:

So why just one picture?

Hi Darrell,

Can post as much pictures as needed It's the right arm of the cross.

Just wonder if all the Junkcer KCs with 800 L/12 mark and Lazy 2 have the same die flaw:

Hello,

What to hear your opinions about this KC and etui: