Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Guest Rick Research
    Posted

    From his 1935 "Wer Ist's?" entry, he returned to Germany and joined Hussar Regiment 12 in September 1914.

    He was appointed Leutnant in that regiment without permanent seniority (ernannt rather than patentiert) 30 July 1915 (wartime Seniority Lists--unchanged at war's end).

    He was still with HR 12 in 1916 when he received his GSF3bX (award roll published last year :rolleyes: ).

    After that he seems to have wandered around in Adjutant type positions-- he claimed as far afield as the Turkish War Ministry.

    All while style plain old "Ribbentrop."

    Discharged as charakterisiert Oberleutnant aD.

    Posted

    He was appointed Leutnant in that regiment without permanent seniority (ernannt rather than patentiert) 30 July 1915 (wartime Seniority Lists--unchanged at war's end).

    Discharged as charakterisiert Oberleutnant aD.

    Rick;

    I have a fair research library, including 20+ Ranglisten, and some other such items, and was poking in my 1918 preuss. Dienstaltersliste and noticed that the description of officers' seniority changed mid-war. From what you said above, I guess that the "powers that be" grew alarmed at the greater and greater number of officers and wanted to decrease the number that had permament rights, benefits, etc. post-war. I guess "ernannt" implies that the holder has been appointed Oberleutnant or whatever, but was not given a Patent" or certificate of permament seniority. Earlier in the war, weren't officers appointed to a rank, and the Patent came later, with a different effective date?

    Is this sort of stuff, so wonderfully complicated, which makes this stuff so much fun, explained nicely somewhere? In English or German. (French? My wife has some Old Norse.)

    Many thanks for your labors over the years.

    Bob Lembke

    Guest Rick Research
    Posted

    No, I expet it was the opposite. They were overwhelmed by the numbers commissioned during the war-- and what was the point of bureaucratic nitpicking about who had seniority over whom when 80% of them were likely to become casualties? They DID slowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwly get around to Patents during the war, but I suspect this was simply not a priority.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.