Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Stogieman

    Honorary Member
    • Posts

      10,138
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      33

    Posts posted by Stogieman

    1. Chris is correct. All the bars shown belonged to the same man. The double-row set was stone-cold mint and doesn't appear to have ever been worn. The other interesting thing is the "close-enough" ribbon from (???) used to represent his Centennary Medal.

      A second set of bars, double row, was broken. The top row was sold with the medal bar itself, which I will post tonight with the bottom row sold off the following week.....

    2. Ha! Another example of (shall we say) "Artistic License"........ Regulation had the "W" to the front, preference often saw it reversed! The same situation arose with the mounting of the 1813 EK2..... regulation dictated the "smooth" face forward.... preference had it reversed... the regulation was so flagrantly ignored an addendum was eventually posted allowing the change!!

    3. OK, back from the Germ-Infested Twin's house. Yuck........ anyway, here's some better scans. The bar popped up in the UK, was sold on eBay.de.......... with no award in first place. Wear pattern of the ribbon, etc. suggest EK2. The original seller thought "too young to fight in 1864, too young 1866, but fought 1870/71" His words, not mine. I'm thinking Medical all the way.

      Now here's the really spectacular thing......... this bar is obviously a ca. 1880 bar. No Jubilee Oaks, No Centennial, No Battle Bars. When the bar arrived here, guess what? All the medals are mounted on the spring-loaded clips we would often find on WW1 and later bars. This is the earliest example of this style either of the Rickies has seen. Ribbons, mounting style, etc. are all consistent with pre-1900 officer-style mount. Typically (NOT always!!) the trapezoid Bars would be found on "Other Ranks". The campaign medals are all tied in place. the Milit?r-Ehrenzeichen, 2. Klasse is not, but the ribbon is stretched/worn in a manner that would be consistent with this huge fixed loop only. So, we're looking at an NC award of this medal for 1864, or 1866 !! This award garners an absurd value in the "books'......... it is only the second one we are aware of and hits a whopping 3.5 on the scale of rarity......

      Because of the clip-in, there's no other possibility for what was missing on the bar. A PCO/RAO would simply not match the bar for mounting height.

      As for the NC EK2 and C KDM for 1870/71...... I can offer no explanation without the documents, or knowing exactly who this fellow was. Probably Medical/Beamter.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.