Trooper_D

On 13/02/2019 at 01:02, GlennC said:

Ferdinand v. Kusserow  decorations up close.

What wonderful detail, Glenn. Is the portrait life size? At whatever scale, the artist obviously studied the medals extremely closely and understood what he was painting.

[ETA having now posted, I see that GlennJ has said the same thing - but better!]

The Royal Exchange is a building in the City of London with a long history of commerce so it is no surprise to find a retailer (or even a maker) of edged- and other weapons located there. Even today, it has retail shops either inside or round its exterior.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Exchange,_London

Googling >lacy "67 royal exchange" london< will give you lots of results referencing 'Bennett Sword Cutler to the Prince of Wales 67 Royal Exchange'. However, this link is for a pistol signed “Lacy, #67 Royal Exchange, London” so either Lacy was the predecessor to Bennett or they shared a premises, I would think.

http://www.icollector.com/Over-and-under-tap-action-flintlock-two-shot-pistol-signed-Lacy-67-Royal-Exchange-London-The-p_i17738889

16 hours ago, Brian Wolfe said:

How's that for a safe and quite broad identification; just put everything in one of two categories, British and non-British.

I'm liking your classification system a lot, Brian

Radarone

The Royal Armouries hold a number of examples of this sword. You (and Brian, if you haven't already seen it) will, I think, be interested in the discussion about the type in the Notes section at the end of this page, 

https://collections.royalarmouries.org/object/rac-object-7796.html

15 minutes ago, utopis said:

No, it's the real deal. 

It's part of the Royal Collection

See here: https://www.rct.uk/collection/441498/order-of-the-black-eagle-prussia-george-vs-star-with-garter

I have to say that the last photo on that page (of a group of breast stars), particularly when seen at full size, is pretty breathtaking!

An absolutely amazing series of photos, 1812 Overture, thank you. You have opened my eyes to aspects of the late Chinese Empire/early Chinese Republic period I wasn't previously aware of. In particular, some of the personalities you have shown us have prompted me to investigate them further.

13 hours ago, dpast32 said:

Hello Gents,  I have a question pertaining to the above enlarged photo of this M.B.E.'s Hallmarks. Could anyone please advise on Stamps # 2 & # 3, respectively ? Of the show 4 markings, I'm aware of #'s 1 ( SG = Sebastian Garrard ) & # 4 ( London date letter for 1919 ) I 'think' # 3 may be the Lion / Leopard's head, but am not too sure as to it's meaning ?  So if anyone would be so kind as to provide a brief idea as Stamps # 2 & 3, I would be most appreciative. THANK YOU

       Best,  dpast32  /  dpast32@aol.com

The leopard's head is the mark for the London Assay Office (the lion indicates that it is sterling silver, of course). This page explains this and other Assay Office marks

http://www.silvercollection.it/DICTIONARYDECRYPTINGUKSTERLINGMARKS.html

I am not completely convinced that the date mark is for 1919 as I can't see the riser for a gothic lower case 'd'. Rather, it looks like a gothic 'o' (1929) to me. Perhaps that can only be confirmed by another look at the letter through a loupe and a comparison with the date letters on this page,

https://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Dates/London/Cycle 1916-1935.html

A fascinating exposition, Flyingdutchman, and a wonderful dagger to accompany it!

Thanks for clearing that up, Jacques. So it's unique for the 'Commander-in-chief' rather than being for what would have been - even without the Orders insignia on the cuirass - the best dressed cavalry in Europe!

This looks like an interesting book, Jacques, on a subject I - for one - don't know anything about.  Perhaps one for my Christmas present list

I am intrigued by the blingtastic helmet and cuirass as I have never seen one like it before. Can you tell me more about it or, at least, where the image comes from. Thanks in advance.

Thank you for your useful clarifications and context, Tifes, particularly your observations on the award of the War Decoration.

18 hours ago, larsb001 said:

I just assumed that the Red Cross organization would political independant, ...

As far as I understand it, this is a state award with no connection to the International Red Cross. I am attaching the section on the award in von Procházka's Österreichisches Ordenshandbuch, which - if you read German - will give you a better understanding.

18 hours ago, larsb001 said:

And yes, it's a Danish mounting, ...

We know that the 1864-1914 Red Cross Order without the krieg dekoration (the laurel wreath) was awarded in return for a subscription (crudely put, the larger the subscription, the higher the award). The award with the krieg dekoration was only given, I understand, for appropriate war service. That being the case, I wonder what a Dane would have done to warrant it? Any thoughts?

These are two different awards with different founding constitutions and, perhaps, different awarding criteria, are they not, Lars? That being the case, there should be no reason why both shouldn't be worn, I would have thought.

I have a question of my own, if I may? What is the (national?) significance of the pentagon shape of the ribbon? Danish? I ask because I have a 1864-1914 Red Cross Order mounted on a similar ribbon.

19 minutes ago, tifes said:

There is no evidence of “re-nobilitation” - quite widespread and many time foul practise when wealthy bourgeois families had been trying to prove that they are originating from old, usually lesser nobility but the evidence was “lost in time".

Just to add to Tomas's comprehensive posting, here is a link to a most interesting journal article, in English, by Jan Županič on the subject of re-ennoblement in the KuK,

Re-ennoblement and nobility issues at the dawn of the Austro-Hungarian Empire (2009)

In his introduction, he gives a good explanation of how a bourgeois soldier could become ennobled under the 30-year service rule.

26 minutes ago, Mattyboy said:

Thank you Dave! Here is the link to the IWM images, plus a group photo which I saw elsewhere

What an interesting photo! Taken after a Mess night, I would imagine, by the 'refreshed' expressions on some of their faces

I notice that there is an Austrian officer present in the second from back row (and, perhaps, another in the rear row). I wonder what they are doing there? 

2 hours ago, dedehansen said:

Hello 1812 Overture,

please post only photos where you own the copyright.

Andreas

I understand why you have written this but, in fairness to 1812, CCJ doesn't own the copyright of the photos which started this thread. Indeed, if we only posted photos where we did own the copyright, this would be a rather image-poor site, I think.

That having been said, I agree that you are correct by the letter of the law.

13 hours ago, Bayern said:

Hello , Surely General Kovess is looking some thing or person less  agreable

A squadron of Cossack Cavalry bearing down on them?   

Members might be interested to see that the Dorotheum has a KuK infantry officer's tschako and its wet-weather cover for sale, a photo of which I attach (a super-size version can be found at the link below. Although I have seen illustrations before - I seem to remember that it was shown in one of the postcards Ludwig Koch illustrated for the BKWI company - I have never seen a good photo of one of these covers before. The picture of the box is a bonus!

Details of the sale here

I would have expected an Int Corps button to show the whole badge.

9 hours ago, Von Thronstahl said:

Women on the first photo is wearing her beloved´s(probably) uniform. 

I'm sure you're right about this and I have seen it a lot. Was there some kind of tradition behind these photos?

As you say, 1812, the definition of the relief, particularly on the reverses of these medals, is exceptional. Thanks for posting your pictures of them

4 hours ago, 1812 Overture said:

This is a photo I took when I was gathering with friends. 

Welcome to GMIC, 1812 Overture. I am sure that you are going to enjoy this site as much as we will enjoy your postings.

May I ask what was the occasion when you and your friends were wearing these uniforms, and where?

Interesting item, Jeff. Thanks for showing it to us and for clearing up its purpose. Do you now know any more about the silver gilt version you have seen?

Thanks for the explanation, djn. 

An enviable display, djn! Thanks for showing it.

What is the explanation for the MVK hanging from what appears to be a damenschleife, please? Presumably, they were never issued to females so what is its significance?