Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    GMU

    Active Contributor
    • Posts

      119
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      3

    Posts posted by GMU

    1. With all due respect, GMU, I also have never seen such a Deschler with that particular pin, hinge, and clasp configuration. If you would be so kind as to disclose to us what "literature" you are referencing where a Deschler such as yours is shown as genuine, as your time permits. . .

      Hello Bill.

      An example with exactly the same dimensions as the piece I show, and with the same "1" hallmark is shown on pages 152 - 153 of DAS EISERNE KREUZ, 1813 bis heute, v. H. Gei?ler, Patzwall 1995

      The piece I show has the following characteristics:

      a) 45mm x 45mm x 27mm

      b) Three piece construction with Iron Center

      c) Has a shallow swastika unlike what has been suggested

      d) Date numbers are even, not uneven as has been suggested before.

      e) Numbers do not touch lower rim as has been stated before. Although not as high as many EK I?s but in similar position to many other EK I?s

      f) The ?1? hallmark is typical of many other Deschlers made pieces

      g) The pin is similar to that shown on Gei?lers?s book.

      h) HOWEVER the hinge is not!

      Now, regardless of it being a Deschler or not, is this medal an authentic EK I ? I believe it is.

      But, is it a Deschler? Points a) through g) makes me believe it is. However, is h) enough to discard it as a Deschler given all the other characteristics?

      If it is, it is. If it is not, it isn?t. I am no seller and I am not pretending to pass a piece for what it is not. The only thing is that, as of now, I haven?t received a real argument against it being a Deschler.

      Regards,

      George

    2. Comparing yours with those above, do you still think yours is an original Deschler?

      Comparing mine to literature examples, yes. Comparing mine to the other cross hallmarked "1", however, makes me doubt about the authenticity of the other cross. The hallmark doesn?t look like anything seen on literature.

    3. Well for a start look at the numerals and position of the date... They are not the same and it sits too low, touching the frame. The swastika is too pronounced... Deschlers are very low and below the height of the frame.

      Why don't you post a full, in focus, photo of the back of your cross?

      Cross: 45 mm. x 45 mm.

      Cross arm 27 mm.

      IPB Image

      IPB Image

    4. Hello,

      This Ulanka belonged to a Rittmeister Schmidt, who served with the 2nd. Royal Saxon Uhlan Regiment No. 18, garrisoned at Leipzig.

      The tunic has a tag with the officer?s name, the regiment number and the date 1915. The Ulanka has the new regimetal color (burgundy) after it was changed from ponceau rot (poppy red) in 1915.

      IPB Image

      IPB Image

      IPB Image

      Thanks to Glenn at the Aerodrome Forum, I learnt that we are possibly talking about Rittmeister der Reserve Alfred Schmidt of 2. Ulanen-Regiment Nr. 18.

      Leutnant: 22.11.99

      Oberleutnant d.R.: 14.8.08 A

      Rittmeister d.R: 14.8.13 G

      Paul Chepurko at the Wehrmacht Awards Forum wrote the following:

      "According to the 1914 Sachen Rangliste he had the following awards:

      1. Sachen Albert Cross 2nd class

      2. Landwehr long service 2nd class

      3. Sachen Ernestine house order 2nd class

      4. Sachen Altenburg Ernest medal

      Since he was a reserve officer he is not listed in the post war army honor ranklist"

      Can someone in this forum provide me with more information about this person? A picture perhaps???

      Thanks,

      George

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.