andy

...

rear

Hi

I just picked this one up and would like to know if this model of cross is considered to be wartime manufacture or later.

comes complete in its case with a label on the lid that I cannot make out.

any thoughts

thanks

andy

Many thanks again for your help. Anyone have any thoughts on the packet?

regards

andy

cross and packet

hi

I could do with some help with this one please. Is it simply confirmation of issue of an EK2 that

was requested in 1934?.What is the reference to 14.10.1883 about-is this just his date of birth? Came with a KM marked cross and a waxy type paper packet that i have never seen before. any thoughts?

thnaks

andy

Micha do you know if this type of plate is only to this maker or

have you come across it on other makers crosses. I only ask as I have a cross with the same rear plate but not maker marked

thanks

andy

Anyone help?

thnaks

andy

3

pic 2

Hi

This cross is non magnetic and marked 800 on the frame.Not one I have come across and therefore I have my doubts about it but would appreciate other opinions.It weights in at 22.6g

many thanks

andy

ek2

last

rear

Hi

I would appreciate your help here please.Firstly,any ideas as

to the maker of the EK1 and secondly, I would appreciate your views

on the RW packet. I have a couple of these blue packets maked KO

but this is the first time I have seen an RW marked packet.The cross is also

marked RW although I had this before the packet so they did not come

together

thanks

andy

mm

The rear

Just received this cross . I have compared it to the cross recently posted in theis thread:

http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=21284

and it looks ok to me although the MM is in a different place. Shame about the paint work, looks like someone has either tried to touch it up or clean it?Is there anything that can be done or is it best left as is?

Would appreciate opinions

thnaks

andy

Hi Andy,

Have you examined the edges of this one very carefully? I don't have a problem with the core or the frames or the hardware, but I find it unusual that a TR replacement (private purchase) example would be marked with a Prasidialkanzlei (TR award piece) number. Maybe it's only a production error, but unusual combinations should be looked at carefully.

Regards

Mike

Hi Mike

Frame looks good. I do not think this has been mesed with. See this thread:

http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=3691&hl=mayer

regards

andy

Thanks Joe

Yes it is.

regards

andy

rear

Hi

Can anyone see any problems with this one?

cheers

andy

Sorry,forgot,here is the sinature on the EK certificate

regards

andy

last

Many thanks indeed that is exactly what I was looking for. These are the last couple of pages from the book. They look like they have been cut down in size. Does this tell us anything else after 1916?

Once again, many thanks

andy