Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    dante

    Valued Member
    • Posts

      2,470
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      2

    Posts posted by dante

    1. It would serverely affect your ability to navigate underwater Jim, though you would know when you were getting to crush depth well before the hull collapsed. The SOP now (and in the past) would be to surface. Obviously a disadvantage as stealth is the subs main trump card, but better than a watery grave due to collision with submerged land features. If you were in enemy waters this would create a bit of a dilemma.

      Having said that, many critical gauges on subs are like eyeballs and testicles, you have two just in case... :speechless1:

      Regards;

      Johnsy

      Just put it on ebay 330120496413 if anyone is interested

    2. Ah, the enormous "British style" hook back ribbon bar. A very strange and unusual (and unpopular!) German style mounting.

      Undoubtedly an Oldenburg FAK. The last two would probably be any Prussian/navy long service award XV, XII, IX and a Third Reich Civil Service Cross-- probably a 25.

      This particular medal bar, the naughty former Petty Officer with a "before the enemy" bar on his FAK has quite improperly worn TWO Imperial long service awards (a XXV and an XV):

      Rick thanks, the bar is stamped "DRGM" you must admit as a collector the nice thing about these bars is that you can add the missing medals at your leisure which is good as single medals go for a song, as ever thanks, Paul

    3. Thanks Paul,

      Much better images.

      I'll go out on a limb here a bit with an opinion. Your EK is certainly not an award piece nor from the 1870 era. More likely a commercially acquired replacement or for window display in an effects shop. No earlier than the Jubilee era c. 1895 and possibly a little later as the quality resembles a 1914 era EK in some ways.

      Just some thoughts.

      Tony

      Tony, I agree as a part-time antiques dealer it is the equalivant of a 17 century copy of a 16 century piece, not right but not a 20 century copy, I like it (thats what maters) and its stunning to look at, thanks, Paul

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.