Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    SimonLMoore

    Past Contributor
    • Posts

      70
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    Posts posted by SimonLMoore

    1. Hey chaps, first I'd like to say this project is not dead, just that I have come up against a bit of a brick wall finding out more information, particularly regarding specific dates, I hope re-opening this thread might turn up some more information. The main issue I am having is with the various grades of Inspector's uniform, circa 1870-1886. 

      Below are two illustrations I've done to show the issues I'm having, the top example is based on information in the 'Behind the Blue Lamp' series and the famous Vanity Fair caricature of Chief Inspector Ebenezer Denning with an accompanying painting of the Lobby of the House of Commons from 1886.

      Both these sources show Chief Inspectors wearing a uniform as shown on the right, the helmet plate is known to be correct as is the silver embroidery on the tunic, an extant example in a photograph posted elsewhere on this forum seems to have blackened brass buttons but period photos seem to show bright metal buttons (transitional?). In both sources the rosette atop the helmet appears to be bright not blackened though I would be happy to be corrected on this if it is wrong.

      The Inspectors uniform on the left has a question mark hanging over it, the helmet plate is known to be correct, should the rosette atop the helmet be bright not blackened? Is the lack of the silver embroidery to the cuffs correct as a way of identifying the two ranks?

      Finally were these uniforms the predecessors of the examples shown in the second image or worn as every day uniform or did they exist concurrently but as a dress uniform?
      Untitled-1.thumb.png.00eb6062dc22ca7a664

      The second illustration, below, shows two uniforms known to be largely correct, the tunics at least, the helmet details have the same question marks as raised above. The questions I have are, when was this sort of tunic introduced (possibly around 1886, the famous group photograph of H Division from around this time, posted earlier in this thread by Zeb seems to show Inspectors wearing this plainer uniform but with kepis, hoping to get a clearer version of the photo at some point.) And when did Chief Inspectors receive the crown on the collar to denote their rank? As I understand it Sub-Divisional Inspectors were identified by a star on the collar from the introduction of the rank in 1887 so it is possible the crown also came into use at this time?
      Untitled-2.thumb.png.767f86f4183772209d8

      Any help much appreciated, information has otherwise dried up and I am alas too far North to head to the Metropolitan Police Heritage Centre for the foreseeable future.

    2. I hope you don't mind me re-opening this thread but it follows on from the discussion of dress swords above, there is an excellent 2012 photograph of the City of London Police Commissioner on horseback with a ceremonial sword adorned with a gold sword knot with a darker thread (blue?) interwoven, rather like those used by Royal Navy officers. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e0/Mounted_Police.JPG

      Obviously the City force is an exception, I'm assuming other forces with white rather than yellow metal buttons insignia etc. would have a silver sword knot if any for the most senior officers? Photographs seem to show this for the Met, brilliant photo of Colonel Sir Edward Bradford with "Metropolitan Police Commissioners' ceremonial sword, cavalry pattern with mameluke hilt." http://lafayette.org.uk/bra2660.html#N_1_

      I've seen some excellent photos of Superintendents in the Met wearing (presumably black) leather Army style knots with their ceremonial swords, circa 1890s,early 1900s. There are certainly extant photographs of Inspectors wearing ceremonial swords into the 1910s but they do not appear to wear sword knots.

      I'd be interested to know know more about ceremonial Police swords, knots and scabbards if anyone has any further information or can direct me to a source!

    3. Hey chaps, I'm hoping someone on here will be able to assist me in answering a question which has, sort of been asked on here before but not coherently, I now have the information I need to ask the specific question and it regards Metropolitan Police Inspectors/Chief Inspectors uniform circa the 1880s as this seems to be around the date of changeover, if there is one.

      Basically there are two patterns of tunic to consider one with 'silver' buttons and silver wire embroidery to cuffs and collar and the other more familiar with black buttons and trim. What I am trying to ascertain is was the latter a replacement for the former and if so when did this take place or were they worn concurrently with the silver buttoned and embroidered tunic as dress uniform.

      I have seen a photograph of H Division prior to 1888 which shows the tunic without silver embroidery and with black buttons being worn hence my thoughts on the date of changeover.

      dsc_0096-a2.thumb.jpg.911d0975cc90abe85c vs. 123.thumb.jpg.daa2c4ddbdc58d17c0bedab503

    4. Nice to see myths being perpetuated by the BCC, the 7 trouser creases do not represent the 7 seas. Indeed if you were under a certain height (5' 6" I think) you only had 5.

      Edit; wow, seems that graphic is put out by the RN itself. They don't seem to know their own history. The 3 stripes are also nothing to do with Nelson's victories, some original collars had only 2 and it was decided with the introduction of a uniform for all sailors in 1857 that 3 looked better, smarter, etc. It's not naval folklore, it's landlubber's folklore that's grown up around the uniform well after the fact.

    5. Smock and Trousers, Combat, 1968 Pattern

      The first really major deviation from the combats introduced druing the Korean war, the 1968 pattern sees quite a bit of simplification, the elbow patches are gone from the smock, as is the stitched collar, the back seam is gone and there are other small detail differences. The trousers have lost the knee pads which ran as a double-thick layer around the centre part of the leg in previous patterns but a second map pocket was added to the right leg. No label for the trousers as again it's been removed

      Smock, Combat, 1968 Pattern

      IMG_2779.thumb.JPG.fc369fa74d07c12683638

      IMG_2783.thumb.JPG.c55975bbd95df45a14f7c

      IMG_2780.thumb.JPG.c5e29c273158a652dcac3

       

      Trousers, Combat, 1968 Pattern

      IMG_2781.thumb.JPG.5953d58bc4961051109f7

      IMG_2782.thumb.JPG.1d8cc299ab5b66109f0b5

      IMG_2779.thumb.JPG.fc369fa74d07c12683638

      IMG_2783.thumb.JPG.c55975bbd95df45a14f7c

      IMG_2780.thumb.JPG.c5e29c273158a652dcac3

      IMG_2781.thumb.JPG.5953d58bc4961051109f7

      IMG_2782.thumb.JPG.1d8cc299ab5b66109f0b5

    6. Smock and Trousers, Combat, 1960 Pattern

      The 1960 pattern standardised the existing combat uniform for general issue to replace the then still extant 1949 pattern battledress. Buttons were no longer vegetable ivory but of hard green plastic, these were first seen on late-issues of the combat sateen uniform.

      The smock differs from the previous pattern in having rounded elbow patches, rather than large, square patches. The trousers differ little from the 1953 pattern.

      The material is a coarser weave than the very fine sateen material seen in the earliest pattern of combats, this material started to be used in later manufacture of the Smock, Combat, Sateen and the Trousers, Combat, 1953 Pattern, as with most uniform changes in material came in gradually, across official pattern designations.

      Smock, Combat, 1960 Pattern

      318168

      318169

      318170

       

      Trousers, Combat, 1960 Pattern

      IMG_2762.thumb.JPG.86c716e6f2cdfccb2b3e8

      318172

      318173

      IMG_2761.thumb.JPG.b857cdd7293486a449f3d

      IMG_2764.thumb.JPG.f40db4d481c8cc5bdf495

      IMG_2765.thumb.JPG.d91f9e4b646abd890dbe7

      IMG_2762.thumb.JPG.86c716e6f2cdfccb2b3e8

      IMG_2763.thumb.JPG.0f253ea77b0d3ff32bc22

      IMG_2767.thumb.JPG.21bdc7d6208a0b0c0ee39

    7. Smock and Trousers, Combat, Sateen

      Several patterns here, the first issue being the Smock, Combat, Sateen and Trousers, Combat, Sateen, sometimes referred to as '1950 Pattern' the smock remained largely unchanged, the trousers went through two other patterns, 1952 and 1953 pattern. The 1952 pattern deleted the button flap over the zip fly and slanted the side pockets, the 1953 pattern basically combines the simplified fly of the 1952 pattern with the original pocket layout from the Trousers, Combat Sateen.

      Smock, Combat, Sateen

      318156

      318157

      318158

       

      Trousers,Combat, Sateen

      318159

      318160

      318161

       

      Trousers, Combat, 1952 Pattern

      318162

      318163

      318164

       

      Trousers, Combat, 1953 Pattern

      318165

      318166

      318167

      IMG_2748.thumb.JPG.fb6493a2306fdc9de2112

      IMG_2749.thumb.JPG.6416281db05fde974a08e

      IMG_2753.thumb.JPG.d63da17de758d732b15de

      IMG_2750.thumb.JPG.4fd35e24c5ec09279bfef

      IMG_2751.thumb.JPG.25b3ee446ae2525eeb3ac

      IMG_2752.thumb.JPG.c373b0fe2a5659635e26e

      IMG_2755.thumb.JPG.f73a5d70f5d2e84582b65

      IMG_2756.thumb.JPG.d1bc463933684e6f387a0

      IMG_2754.thumb.JPG.073fba8bb2e42464da0ba

      IMG_2759.thumb.JPG.ad885a38a9ec90895b458

      IMG_2760.thumb.JPG.3431ba48abcdebf40d1ff

      IMG_2758.thumb.JPG.349b04a78cc5bc09162d9

    8. Thanks for showing.  I've not seen the "T" below the Ubique grenades before.

       

      Glad it was of interest. I rather thought the collars for TF RA Officers gained the 'Ubique' at the same time as the cap badge, in 1917. I believe the Ts, in contrast, were regulation until 1940. Happy to be corrected but that was my understanding, not saying as gospel as I sadly don't have access to my reference books to double check right now. 

    9. Hi Chaps, been on a hiatus from the forum for far too long, I thought I'd make a return by posting up some photos of a recent acquisition, a 1918 dated RA Territorials Officer's tunic, rather interesting as it's made to an off-the-peg size. In rather nice condition for it's age. 

       

      http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2015/post-17470-0-04534600-1425323122.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2015/post-17470-0-78917100-1425323096.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2015/post-17470-0-48108900-1425323095.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2015/post-17470-0-09665400-1425323071.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2015/post-17470-0-85916000-1425323097.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2015/post-17470-0-97367500-1425323098.jpg

    10. Firstly, hello again after a very long hiatus!

       

      Thought I'd begin my return by sharing an old cabinet card here which I have shown before, cropped. However I noticed on zooming in the buttons are a bit odd, as far as I am aware. I understand the City Police senior officers had and indeed still have buttons bearing the City of London coat of arms whereas this chap has a St. Edward's crown in the centre and a scroll surrounding.

       

      The cap badge and other details certainly indicate a City of London Police Inspector. 

       

      Any help much appreciated.

       

      http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2015/post-17470-0-48499900-1425322287.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2015/post-17470-0-88581300-1425322289.jpg

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.