Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    PREM

    Active Contributor
    • Posts

      171
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      1

    Posts posted by PREM

    1. Hello! A close friend of mine asks for help, he bought the Order of the Sacred Treasure of the 3rd class, he looks like that, he cannot take a good photo of the punk (supposedly Namikawa, but he did it with a smartphone). In my opinion there is something wrong with this order and it is either very worn, or it is not necessarily the original. My knowledge is too small to be appreciated, so I present it to professionals ? asking for help.

      Thanks !!

      140385903_698972447464239_4552477068927464393_n.jpg

      140002723_440248860488146_4259623660132412082_n.jpg

      140296790_792908988105842_3068761684011365075_n.jpg

      140397283_883220495763809_6659658334189402460_n.jpg

      140698204_170602694819709_6317586654156934466_n.jpg

    2. I received two crosses as a gift from a friend. One of them is obvious and I have no problem with it - it is about the Gallipoli cross, connected with the army of General Wrangel and the evacuation of troops. The second one is a mystery to me, can you help identify this cross?

      _DSC3361.jpg

    3. Hello ! I will try to help a bit... but as for originality it is difficult to comment.

       

      1. (?) I don't remember where I saw her ...
      2. 9th Uhlan Regiment - officer version of the badge
      3. 82nd Infantry Regiment (Siberian) - officer version of the badge
      4. 2nd Cavalry Regiment - officer version of the badge
      5. 20th Field Artillery Regiment - officer version of the badge
      From these photos it is not so easy to tell if they are originals. Probably no. 4 is not original, but the rest looks quite good. However, at the moment a lot of good "engraving" copies are produced and it is very difficult to distinguish them without having them in hand ..

      Regards

      Prem

    4. In fact, the star is much like mine in a smaller dimension. All in all, it looks interesting, if it's really a fake, it's hard to honor my collection, I didn't overpay much for it  v?

      Thanks for help ?

      I'm uploading some better photos, it actually looks similar to yours .....

      DSC04670.jpg

      DSC04674.jpg

    5. All changed dimensions of the badges are jewelery pieces from what I found and read. Also jewelery items are those in their original dimensions not produced in Turkey, but produced until the Second World War. Modern copies are in standard star size.
      Reduced and enlarged stars were produced in the 20-30s of the 20th century.
      Obviously, this is the information I got, and I do not insist that there is no other explanation. There are many puzzles with this star ?

    6. Based on these photos, you can actually suspect that it is a fake. But it looks a little different live. From the opinion of which I consulted this jewelry product from the years 1920-1930 of the twentieth century. what would be the point of faking the whistle in a reduced size and additionally the star shows signs of enamel repair. Everyone, of course, can judge what they think, but the truth is that only Turkish stars are truly original and the rest are jewelry equivalents made in different periods. I'd love to see your ,,poison cabinet" stars ?

    7. It looks like an original Turkish production - these stars have such a primitive appearance. But they are original, this one also looks like this, I have two similar.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.