Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    ERIC

    For Deletion
    • Posts

      846
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    Posts posted by ERIC

    1. Hey John,

      Great Flak! On all of this style Flak Badge, I've never come across a maker mark of any kind whatsoever - with the exception of this example that I acquired awhile back. A lieferant #5 is found smack dab in the middle of the 88's reverse. I've never seen another one like it. The only difference that I see between it and your example is this marking, and a difference in the catch style - mine has a round stock catch. Is there any possible way to connect the "5" to Scholze??

      ERIC

      [attachmentid=10008]

    2. Hi Kurt,

      IMO, that's a B&NL Flak (in zinc!) all the way. VERY RARE badge indeed. Your new badge matches up very well to my example, except mine has a different hinge and is marked. The hinge on your example is the typical type seen on all B&NLs, as is the recessed catch as John has already stated. My example weighs in at 32.7 grams, so a gram off is really of no concern. The eagle is correct also, in style and method of adherence to the badge - two small rivits on either side of the hinge. The leafing looks spot on as well. I like it alot. Is this the badge you sent me fuzzy pics of eons ago and I told you it looked like a B&NL?? I think I remember you said you were going to take a chance on it because of the rarity of these per our discussion. If so, looks like your 'risk' paid off my friend! cheers.gif I too would like to hear Jan Arnes' thoughts as well - his too is an unmarked example if my memory serves me correctly. I know Frank H. has one of these as well - if he sees this maybe he can chime in as well. Here's your example Kurt with mine so you can see for yourself the similarities.

      Best,

      ERIC

      [attachmentid=9602]

    3. Hi JTW,

      Very sound and sensible thoughts John - makes perfect sense IMO. When I first saw the badge I thought it was an example with an aluminum wreath, noticing the "A", D.R.G.M. right off. When I inquired with the seller as to the badges weight (to verify if indeed an aluminum example), he stated "around 25 grams". I knew right then and there it definately wasn't aluminum - way too heavy. I then assumed it was a zinker(seller "wasn't sure"), and upon opening the package I found that it was a correct assumption. A neat little Assmann variation!

      ERIC

    4. Hi Guys,

      Here's an interesting Assmann FE/AG I recently acquired and thought that I would share. An all zinc example, yet its wreath was obviously struck from the old aluminum wreath die, hence the "A", D.R.G.M. on the reverse. The badge weighs in at 24.1 grams, and its overall finish, eagle included, has held up remarkably well for a zinker. Just a cool cool.gif badge, something a little different!

      ERIC

      [attachmentid=9178]

    5. Hi Eric, I would have to agree with you on the Deumers vs. Juncker in "weight" and appearance, but I still find just a subtle bit more finishing on the Juncker badges. Call me biased, I can live with it  wink.gif

      Hi Rick,

      OK Rick you're biased!! laugh.gif No, really, I know you are partial to the Juncker-made badges, that's okay. I agree with you regarding the hand finishing - those Juncker craftsmen wielded some serious files! Both companies were at the top of their game in badge making no doubt, so no wonder we see so many hybrid badges between the two. I'll still take a Deumer Pilot over a buntmetall Juncker 1st or 2nd Pattern Pilot anytime! wink.gif

      Best,

      ERIC

    6. Thank you everyone, I appreciate it! wink.gif The quality of workmanship on these Deumers' far surpasses those made by Juncker IMO. She weighs in at a hefty 44.1 grams! @Bill - I'm up to 15 Pilot Badges now, but there is always room for more! biggrin.gif @John - an OM is next on the 'hit list' Pilot Badge wise J, but I do have an Assmann 1st Pattern Aluminum Pilot ( a bit worn, but so what!! ) in the works as we speak. Again, thanks to everyone for the kind replys!

      Best,

      ERIC

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.