-
Posts
14,343 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
25
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Store
Posts posted by Ed_Haynes
-
-
. . . comes the exciting stuff.
Medal of Combat, #6094, 22 July 36 (=1946?)
0 -
After some pages of introductory text, apparently outlining available goodies, . . .
0 -
Paired (apparently) with the document shown at http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=6043&st=80 (so, what else is there of his?!) came this sad-looking little paper booklet.
0 -
And a loseup of the recipient, a rather stern-looking truck driver (P05) with lots of ribbons.
0 -
And the interior, dated 12 November 1959.
0 -
An interesting early deputy document from Tov Aimag, the province surrounding Ulanbaatar.
The scan looks more brilliant than the booklet really does.
0 -
There are some interesting documented deputy badges over in the thread on the awards to Jamtsaa Jantsan and I'll just refernce these here, rather than needlessly cross-post.
0 -
And the interior (single page only), dated 12 August 1989. Could this be for A58? Don't think so (see that thread). Some old giuys from WWII still have their medals catching up with them, so . . . ???
0 -
And another from 1989. Even though this is the 50th anniversary year, this seems to be for the original badge, though translation will confirm.
0 -
The interior, awarded 30 July 1986, 47 years on.
0 -
Two bizarre late (very late) documents for the Khalkin Gol Badge/Medal. For the badge and not (apparerntly) for an anniversary. This from 1986 (!).
Exterior.
0 -
And the interior, dated 28 April 1989.
0 -
JC's post prompts me to add a document for a Type 2.2 (unnumbered) medal. This suggests these unnumbered pieces are not mere escapees as some had thought.
Exterior.
0 -
Thanks, JC. These certificates are colorful and fun, but hard to scan. Your efforts are appreciated!
0 -
If you read the list of qualifying classes, the name of the medal (politics aside) does seem apt. You'll need to add six or seven more clasps to the campaign medal to cover occuption duty? At least the design features no plundered Iraqi national treasures (as the regular campaign medal does), though the ribbon is more than a bit evocative of UNEF. I fear the age of silver medals, like the age of clasps as a matter of intention not accident, is long gone. As a medal for civilians this one avoids these charges, but so much of what is done today seems to be done simply to increase the numbers of ribbons on British military chests so they can hold their heads high when standing next to their Amerikan Cousins, who leave basic training pre-equipped with three or four ribbons.
1 -
Nice one, JC. Thanks!
0 -
No never named. Some have been named by enterprising merchants.
Only the Pakistan Medal (independence medal) and some of the gallantry decorations are named. This makes the business far too easy for the fakers of "groups".
0 -
Inside. Awarded 26 August 1985, apparently without serial number.
0 -
How late did awards of the Medal "We Won" extend?!
Outside.
0 -
I was thinking the same thing, that -- like so many Russian museums today -- they have only (poor) copies on display. That means the originals are in storage . . . or . . .
0 -
It not Red Banner, it is Red Star
Oops, sorry. I knew that, fingers moving not together with mind in pre-coffee morning.
Shall fix.
0 -
Nice thread. Thanks.
0 -
Sadly, just a document, but potentially interesting.
Red Star 96982.
We shall see if anything turns up . . . ??
0 -
CAUTION: Be very careful with these when encountered in Pakistani "groups". They are routinely added (often with asserted Gazette of Pakistan references -- but never Xeroxes) by dealers in the UK and Pakistan into fraudulently manufactured Frenkengroups.
0
Is this what I think it is?
in People's Republic Mongolia
Posted
Then follow a number of coupons (30 pages of them -- evidence of only two pages having been torn out), mostly blank, with only three filled in (redeemed?), the last in year 39 (=1949). Does this say something about the mortality of the recipient?