Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Ed_Haynes

    For Deletion
    • Posts

      14,343
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      25

    Posts posted by Ed_Haynes

    1. Who was this guy?

      I discussed this with "A Friend of Us All" in Ulanbaatar. He believed an identity can be assigned. Watch this space . . . .

      :beer:

      That last ribbon is very much tinkered together on my bar, but has what seems to be a French-style 2nd class (gold-rosette-silver) device.

      And just to see them side-by-side . . .

    2. There hasn't been much focused discussion of these (to me at least) very confusing badges.

      Could we start some? Please??

      Just to start it off, here is what my notes have on types and such details. I am sure these need MUCH help.

      :beer:

      Type 1 (E01, numbered) - Low = 203/High = 945 - 1940s?

      Type 2 (E02) - Low = ??/High = 1054 - 1950s?

      Type 3 (E03) - 1960s?

      Type 4 (heavy construction, reliev reverse, Soviet-made?)

      Type 5 (E04) - 1970s?

      Type 6 (E05) - 1980s?

      Type 7.1 (E06, unnumbered) - 1990s?

      Type 7.2 (E06, numbered) - Low = B-5/High = B-1266 - 1990s?

    3. The additional complexity was that these badges were made up by so many European makers to "improve" on the quality and design of the Iranian insigniae.

      The standing lion/lying lion does seem to indicate no more than a civil/military division, and not a religious categorisation. As most civil awards went to foreign "experts" in Iran (most of whom were Christians) we see the source of this confusion.

    4. Let me look, I may have that one. Most of the OMSA pieces in those days were pretty much written to formula and Dr. K contributed many pieces (usually with pretty good information). A shame most of this is lost. Though Bob Wehrlich "borrowed" some of it for his book.

      There are some other good sources, but I shall have to exchavate -- and they may be in Farsi.

      Could you post the group?

    5. 344 - 16.3gr

      393 - 14.7gr

      With these weights, I think we're on a wild goose chase for these very early awards... just too much chance of slight variations (e.g. manufacturing or shortening of the screw).

      Agreed, except for the difference between the flat-back bronze and silver.

      The screw-post shortening is surely an issue for all Mongolian awards, as is the random variation in manufacturing (some of which we may otherwise want to see as a sub-sub-variety -- colours of enamel and all).

      But this is something we'd never know until we knew it.

    6. Just to update known types/ranges:

      1st award

      Type 1.1 (Screwback; 3 rivets; SN just below screwpost); Low = 50/High = 2794

      Type 1.2 (as above, but with Cyrillic ?B? mintmartk); Low = 1871/High = 1901

      Type 2.1 (Pinback 3 rivets; SN at 12 o'clock); Low = 3160/High = 4449

      Type 2.2 (Pinback 2 rivets; SN at 5 o'clock); Low = 4685/High = 5380

      Type 3.1 (pinback, bronze); Low = 5512/High = 5607

      Type 3.2 (pinback, bronze, unnumbered, escapee?)

      2nd award

      Screwback; 3 rivets; SN just below screwpost ? perhaps 40 awarded?; Low = 12/High = 398

      3rd award

      Screwback; 3 rivets; SN just below screwpost ? perhaps 10-15 awarded?; Low = 5/High = 200

      4th award

      Screwback; 3 rivets; SN just below screwpost ?perhaps 4-5 awarded?; Low = 3/High = 86

    7. Current SB classification and ranges:

      Type 1 (screwback ? ~1000 awarded); Low = 2/High = 788; 1945-71

      Type 2 (pinback - ~700 awarded); Low = 835/High = 2006; 1971-2002

      Type 3.1 (coarse manufacture, numbered??); Low = ??/High = ??; 2002-??

      Type 3.2 (coarse manufacture, unnumbered ? or merely unissued - escapee?); 2002?

    8. Some weights, combining Jan's ("J"), Dolf's ("D"), "FJCP"'s ("F"), Bob's ("B") and mine ("E"). More to come, please . . . ???

      Type 1.1 (Mongol legend, crude construction, mirror reverse, integral number) - Low = 9/High = 393

      E ? 155 = 13.80 g

      E ? 380 = 12.95 g

      Type 1.2 (Mongol legend, crude construction, mirror reverse, engraved number) - Low = 396/High = 399

      E - 396 = 11.35 g

      Type 2.1.1 (Mongol legend, mirror reverse, serial number at 10 o?clock) - Low = 32/High = 496

      ???

      Type 2.1.2 (Mongol legend, mirror reverse, serial number at 7 o?clock) - Low = 221/High = 4100

      B - 534 = 15.2 g

      B - 791 = 16.0 g

      F - 865 = 16 g

      J - 1236 = 13 g

      F - 1507 = 16 g

      E ? 2932 = 16.65 g

      E ? 2949 = 16.40 g

      E ? 3017 = 15.40 g

      E ? 3035 = 13.50 g

      B - 3283 = 16.4 g

      D - 3344 = 16.80 g

      D - 3345 = 16.15 g

      B - 3382 = 14.7 g

      J - 3450 = 16 g

      J - 3519 = 19 g

      F - 3537 = 19 g

      Type 2.2.1 (Mongol legend, flat reverse, silvered brass, serial number at 8 o?clock) - Low = 865/High = 1806

      ???

      Type 2.2.2 (Mongol legend, flat reverse, silvered brass, serial number at 6 o?clock) - Low = 1124/High = 1958

      E ? 1430 = 16.50 g

      B - 1800 = 15.2 g

      Type 2.2.3 (Mongol legend, flat reverse, silver) - Low = 4164/High = 4586

      F - 4400 = 19.1 g

      E ? 4546 = 20.25 g

      Type 3 (Cyrillic legend, unnumbered)

      E ? 27.30 g

      E ? 28.55 g

    9. Playing with my new scale today. Some interesting and weighty results on the few RBLs on "home leave". All Type 1 (screwback).

      83 - 64.80 grams

      198 - 61.90 grams

      484 - 62.55 grams

      1423 - 60.05 grams

      All weighed without screw nuts of course.

      Something to think about??

      Tells us something about (1) variability in manufacture, (2) decline in standards over time, and (3) the dangers of expecting too much standardization?

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.