Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    hagahr

    Active Contributor
    • Posts

      162
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      3

    Posts posted by hagahr

    1. well I am absolutely beyond finding any core what so ever ugly .

      but I have one here,,, that wood be seen as ,,let say (crude ) .

      if ,,,,,your not aware that ,,

      the classic A type,,, off the 1870 ek ,,,,was born ,,,,out off the retouched sand model,,,, fore this core .

      so ,,,,the most beautiful,, ( crude ) core ever to me .

    2. Dumb question, but when a individual won the IC, how did they get something of this quality? Were some awards Godet and some other companies? Or was worksmanship of this quality strictly a private purchase piece...while the awarded cross would be cheaper?

      the quality off craftsmanship and material off a regular awarded IC is equal to what ever the private marked could provide .

      so,,,

      fore the private marked the trick is to provide something special .

      in the line off backplates ,hooks ,mousetraps and so on

      lets say fore the new upcoming demand from pilots ,tank drivers ,balloonists ,U boot´ists and other new units evolving with the murderess techniques off the war

      sure connecting the private marked early on ,

      to the official army providers off the Cross ,,,,with who ever could pay fore it .

      and so, come in handy later on ,

      in the after war memorabilia and collector marked

      evolving in the shadow off the lost war and a new upcoming marked around 1920-30 .

      pressing on in to the 1940 and to god knows what year .

      sure a very nice Godet set here . saw it years back on WAF the first time .

      had a few and sold ( traded) a few myself to,

      but they stayed strange to me

      the razor sharp hooks on them as well as the very often almost mint condition these crosses come in made me always´s wonder .

      but sure

      the Godet popularity will always´s make these crosses highly desirable and pricey .

      not to speak about the case´s fore them .

      it is always´s almost a difficult to upgrade addition in anyone´s collection fore sure .

      very nice peace's .

      regards kay

      Holland verzamelt.nl - 1870/1813 OBSERVATIONS

    3. yes your right I did misunderstood the situation a bit ..

      but I still think (in case off the dealer is being responsible fore the replacements )

      ,,the dealer is responsible fore the damage off his actions .

      and responsible to take on all costs to set it right ...

      at best the grouping wood be brought together again ,,,,,and all should be compensated in case off loss in money.

      I understand your difficult situation ,,,,about the variation and wanting to hold on to it .( beside me being very suspicious towards it )

      there are so many variations out there ,,,,,and this one,, is by far not the nicest one .

      maybe you can get a good deal out off it ,and be rewarded with a even better variation in the end .

      but if you want to keep it ,,that is ok as well ....

      you pay'd fore it , in an honest sale ,,,so its yours .

      what you gone do dos not matter ?,,

      its in gods hands ,,lets see where it is getting you ..

      I have a feeling its going to be okay

      regards kay

    4. just out off interest ,,and hopefully off some help .

      silver stamp book 1927 says,,,,,,!

      8 carat alloy gold is regarded as 333 in the 1920/ and 30/40 in Germany ,,

      333 fore silver did not exist in Germany

      fore a Turkish silver mark you wood find a 900/1000 mark or ,,,

      a half moon with a 5 pointed star and a Arabian number.

      the number 336 wood be equal to 1336 /1920 foundation off the Turkish republic .

      ALSO USED

      the Arabic word SAHH

      before that it was the royal tughra .

      but that is 1927 ....

      regards kay

      Iron cross - Home

    5. yes and no ,,,,,,

      basically its hard to say fore anyone

      as the production off oak's went on and on ,,,right in to the late 1930's

      I stick to a certain type if comes down to 1870/95 ,,,,1900 originality .

      and a certain type made 1920/30

      so dos everybody else

      everyone here ( and elsewhere ) has one or Moore certain type's they believe in ,,,,,,

      but no direct and full data to what is fake,,,,,, or what is not .

      only a big mix up off pictures in Books and opinions off experts and experienced collectors.

      and sure a lot off observations as fake ek's are combined with original oaks , and the other way around who made it even worse .

      fore this one ,,most don't like it ( its an ugly one after all )

      but it is also seen in Book as original ...

      that is WY sometimes the prices pay'd are way over general expectations ,,,,

      and sometimes not ...

      my advice

      look to what is commonly excepted as original,,,,, to protect your investment .

      regards kay

      Holland verzamelt.nl - 1884 to1941 laws & regulations

    6. well ,,PK .

      its an interesting thread indeed .

      but what about the official Orden regulations 1941 ?

      Holland verzamelt.nl - 1905 to1941 laws & regulations

      they are a proof,,,,, and a licence to make Orden copy's fore what ever jeweller had the skills fore,,,

      WY is that being ignored ?

      Don''t you think we underestimate the period theatre and film Market,,,,,,,,, fore Orden copy's at the time between 1939 /1945 ?

      Is there a possibility that the market contains the highest Orden equal to the Original ? ( as they had to be by law )

      and just took a high flight,,,,, as the post war era had a need fore memorabilia off such kind ?

      just asking an opinion ?

    7. thanks PKeeting fore the lay out off the situation at the moment ..

      it helps to understand the general situation ?,,, a bit ? ....or not ?

      the odd question about the Schriftzeichen off the firm WA Keune & co remains intriguing .

      coincidence ? a mistake ? ,,,or maybe a link between the two ?,,,,,

      I am looking fore original reference ( official documents ) to the Otto Klein marking ,,,,that is fore sure .

      lets see from there

      regards kay

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.