Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    gregM

    Old Contemptible
    • Posts

      1,298
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      3

    Posts posted by gregM

    1. I am sure if you check the size of this cross, you will find that it is almost TR sized.

      This one matches the 2nd class version I have posted here on a couple of different occasions.

      I had Detlav take a look at mine and he said he had "no problem with the wide frame" and he thought

      that it dated to "post 1900". I read this as saying it is a good Jubilee cross.

      I have seen only 2 others like this posted here or at WAF. This is the first 1st class I have seen.

      Here is my 2nd class.

    2. Better pictures would really help but I like the cross. I am not sure

      about the spange. Even with great pictures I have a tough time telling

      a good one from a bad one. The spangen were awarded seperately.

      The cross in ww1 the spange in ww2. However I would bet that a

      replacement cross and spange could probably be orderd as a private

      purchase item. I have no proof of this but it would just make sence.

      I really like these combinations. Here is one of mine-------

    3. Very, Very BAD fake !!!!!!!!!!

      This style of 1870 can be found on ebay in several different configurations.

      Usually as a pin back marked Deschler and son. However it can be found with

      different makers marks.

      This particular cross jumps out as fake right away because it is a screwback.

      As far as I know there are NO 1870 Ek1 screwback crosses. Next --If you look

      at the screwback itself, it is RZM stamped. There are no screwbacks (even in 1939)

      marked "RZM" Even in pin back form these fakes are easy to spot by the style of the numbers in the 1870 date.

    4. Micha,

      Another wonderfull cross. Congratulations

      Ekhunter

      I think there is one known variation. Some of the KMST slide backs have

      the makers marks stamped into the cross while on others the makers mark

      and DRGM is raised.

      Here is a picture of mine with the raised makers mark.

    5. Micha,

      I like the cross. The details look good and the patina looks right but

      I am not convinced of the Godet stamp. It is hard to make out from the

      photo But I have not seen one like it before.

      When I have seen the Godet stamped directly into the cross and not on

      the pin, it is in an inset box. Just for the record--the one pictured below

      is a full sized 1870 but it does illustrate what I am trying to describe.

    6. Hi Guys,

      Here is an update on my quest to try to figure out this Ek2.

      There have been 2 more of these oversized 1870 Ek2s show up in the last

      year. One from a member over at WAF and also one posted here by Eric "monfort1"

      just resently. I put together an email To Detlev showing links to this thread and to

      all of the other threads discussing these particular crosses.

      His reply to me was that the wideframed 1870 is a good variation made post 1900

      and sold as a private purchase item. ( these were NOT 1871-1873 issue pieces )

      I thought this might be interesting to some of you.

      Here is a link that leads to Eric's cross--

      http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=4965&hl=

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.