nibelungen Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Hello gents, a few years ago I bought this hollow badge, which is your opinion ? Thank you very much and best regards.
Gordon Williamson Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 So far, the type shown in this thread is the only hollow Imperial type that is universally accepted as being authentic to the period, despite the very flimsy pin fitting. A case of the modern copies having better looking fittings than the true originals. http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=31245&view=&hl=steinhauer&fromsearch=1
Guest Rick Research Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 This type was made by Steinhauer & Lück by the 1930s and is clearly identifiable from a number of design features precisely duplicated in their catalog etchings: I can't remember ever seeing any member of the Kriegsmarine NOT wearing this type from the mid 1930s into the war. Chief Engineer of the pre-war Uboat arm Otto Thedsen summer of 1937 or 1938 looking sunburned and cranky, wearing this type badge-- the asymmetrical curved ribands above the wreath are always easy to distinguish:
Guest Rick Research Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 (edited) An earlier solid (unmarked) type from the estate of Thedsen's colleague, Paymaster of Submarines August Böning, side by side with the S&L type: note the difference notable in the "rippling" of those ribands atop the laurel wreath: The earlier badges have ribands virtually identical on each side, while the hollow S&Ls have much more prounced bulges over the bow end of the submarine. Edited December 13, 2009 by Rick Research
nibelungen Posted December 14, 2009 Author Posted December 14, 2009 Thank you Rick for your comments.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now